PFD report

Joseph Hargreaves · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Nov 2020•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Reduced provision of information about events leading up to admission and baseline and underlying health issues to treating clinicians
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide treating clinicians with relevant patient history and baseline information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reduced provision of information about events leading up to admission and baseline and underlying health issues to treating clinicians

Wider context from the report

“The provision of information, about the events leading up to his admission; his baseline and underlying health issues, to treating clinicians was reduced. In his case it did not impact the outcome however it was clear from the evidence that it could in other circumstances cause significant challenges in delivering effective treatment quickly to vulnerable patients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide treating clinicians with relevant patient history and baseline information.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Publish updated care-home visiting guidance as the period of national lockdown ends.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 December 2020.
  2. 2

    Publish and update guidance enabling care-home visiting arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic, including tier-specific and nationally applicable measures.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 December 2020.
  3. 3

    Roll out visitor testing to CQC-registered care homes to support more meaningful indoor visits.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 December 2020.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.3

  1. 1

    Care homes, with local professionals, are responsible for developing visiting policies and balancing visiting benefits against infection risks.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    NHS trusts and other NHS bodies are responsible for deciding local hospital visiting arrangements according to local prevalence and risk assessment.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  3. 3

    Existing NHS infection-control measures and visiting guidance are relied on to balance family access with COVID-19 transmission risks.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish updated care-home visiting guidance as the period of national lockdown ends.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will be looking to ensure that a wider range of visiting arrangements are made available when it is safe to do so. We will publish updated guidance as this period of national lockdown ends.”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and update guidance enabling care-home visiting arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic, including tier-specific and nationally applicable measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to care homes, in April 2020, we published Admissions to Care Homes guidance, co-branded with Public Health England, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and NHS England. This set out advice on infection control procedures, for example, limiting visits to essential visits only, unless in exceptional circumstances, and providing advice on isolation, decontamination, cleaning and protective measures for staff.”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out visitor testing to CQC-registered care homes to support more meaningful indoor visits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 1 December 2020, we published updated guidance to enable more meaningful indoor visits to take place for care home residents across all tiers. This was enabled by providing testing to visitors, following a successful pilot scheme. We began a roll-out of testing for visitors to all CQC-registered care homes in England, with a goal to have testing in place in all care homes by Christmas.”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Care homes, with local professionals, are responsible for developing visiting policies and balancing visiting benefits against infection risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the publication of the Adult Social Care Winter Plan in September 2020, we published specific guidance on facilitating visits to care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This guidance enabled care homes to develop their own visiting policies based on a local dynamic risk assessment, taking a lead from their local Director of Public Health. On the introduction of Local Covid Alert Levels, we updated our guidance. This update enabled visiting to continue as previously for care homes in Local Covid Alert Level 1 (medium risk) but advised visits be limited to exceptional circumstances, such as end of life, in areas in Local Covid Alert Levels 2 and 3 (high and very high risk).”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS trusts and other NHS bodies are responsible for deciding local hospital visiting arrangements according to local prevalence and risk assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 13 October 2020, NHS England revised its guidance on how NHS organisations may choose to facilitate visiting across healthcare inpatient, outpatient and diagnostic service settings during the COVID-19 pandemic¹. Visiting is subject to local discretion by NHS trusts and other NHS bodies, and will take the local prevalence of COVID-19 into account.”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NHS infection-control measures and visiting guidance are relied on to balance family access with COVID-19 transmission risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Patient safety is our top priority, which is why the NHS has stringent infection control measures in place to prevent the spread of coronavirus to vulnerable hospital patients. This includes managing visits in a safe and COVID-secure way.”

Source location

2020-0227-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 21 December 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026