PFD report

Barbara Humphreys · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Jul 2019•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
10

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised10

  1. Failure to fully involve families in palliative care or DNAR decision-making
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable end-of-life care decision-making and consultation
  2. Delays in completing care plans and best interests assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable best-interests decision-making processes
  3. Failure to provide families with sufficient information about palliative care or DNAR decisions
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable end-of-life care decision-making and consultation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Agree and undertake an unannounced joint monitoring visit, including review of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and Best Interest decisions.

    Stated by Powys Teaching Local Health BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 September 2019.
  2. Action

    Write to the GP outlining expectations for timely attendance, transparency, contemporaneous records, documented management discussions, DNACPR decisions, and relevant GMC guidance.

    Stated by Powys Teaching Local Health BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 September 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing GMC guidance is considered sufficient for doctors’ capacity and DNACPR decisions, so a separate policy is not needed.

    Stated by Powys Teaching Local Health BoardExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to fully involve families in palliative care or DNAR decision-making

Wider context from the report

“7. The seventh issue is directed to National Health Service Wales who should consider and if so appropriate draft and implement a policy to ensure that families of those assigned to palliative care and/or made subject to DNAR orders are provided sufficient information about how that decision has been made, that they as a family have been fully involved in the decision-making process and upon what information it has been made such as the limits of patient confidentiality may allow in the circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable end-of-life care decision-making and consultation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing care plans and best interests assessments

Wider context from the report

“5. The fifth issue is directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited which is there was evidence that the completion of care plans and best interests assessments was required to be fitted round other duties and as such may not be completed in a timely fashion. The group and the care home shall consider whether assigning a set or allotted period of time for a RGN to complete the care plan and assessment in the working day would help ensure that the care plan is most accurate and appropriately detailed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable best-interests decision-making processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide families with sufficient information about palliative care or DNAR decisions

Wider context from the report

“7. The seventh issue is directed to National Health Service Wales who should consider and if so appropriate draft and implement a policy to ensure that families of those assigned to palliative care and/or made subject to DNAR orders are provided sufficient information about how that decision has been made, that they as a family have been fully involved in the decision-making process and upon what information it has been made such as the limits of patient confidentiality may allow in the circumstances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable end-of-life care decision-making and consultation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of mattresses unsuitable for particular beds or unable to maintain patient limbs within the mattress area

Wider context from the report

“1. The first issue is directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited and Care Inspectorate Wales. It relates to the use of mattresses which are either not designed for use on particular beds or when used on particular beds are not constructed or designed to maintain a level when a patient is placed in the centre of said mattress. Upon placing of a patient in the centre of said mattress certain mattresses can fold at the edge and otherwise become displaced such that a patient’s limbs will not be maintained within the mattress area. The correct mattress for the correct bed is considered de minimus in terms of a standard ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure mattresses are suitable for care recipients and beds.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include willing patient family members in bed rail risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. The third issue is also directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited. The staff and care homes in general under your control should complete a full and frank risk assessment in relation to any and all issues with regards to bed rails. This should be conducted with the input and knowledge of a patient’s family members, if they so wish and the risk assessment should be reviewed regularly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of adequate staff training in bed rail and accompanying bedding arrangements

Wider context from the report

“2. The second issue is also directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited and requires adequate training to be provided to all employees in the homes operated by your respective companies. The training should include the selection, fitting, management and review of bed rails and accompanying bedding arrangements. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete full and frank bed rail risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“3. The third issue is also directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited. The staff and care homes in general under your control should complete a full and frank risk assessment in relation to any and all issues with regards to bed rails. This should be conducted with the input and knowledge of a patient’s family members, if they so wish and the risk assessment should be reviewed regularly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an implemented full bed rail policy governing regulatory compliance

Wider context from the report

“4. The fourth issue is directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited. The company should produce and implement a full bed rail policy which is either group wide or relevant specific only to Crosfield house Ltd. This should detail how the company intends to ensure their employees are following the letter and spirit of the regulations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform family and next of kin about medically trained professional attendance or review

Wider context from the report

“6. The sixth issue is directed to Care Inspectorate Wales and National Health Service Wales. They shall consider and if so appropriate, draft and implement a policy which requires a care home or care provider to inform the family and next of kin of events in which are medically trained professional has attended to or seen the patient particularly in cases where there is no or varying capacity. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review bed rail risk assessments regularly

Wider context from the report

“3. The third issue is also directed to Crosfield house Ltd and Care Inn limited. The staff and care homes in general under your control should complete a full and frank risk assessment in relation to any and all issues with regards to bed rails. This should be conducted with the input and knowledge of a patient’s family members, if they so wish and the risk assessment should be reviewed regularly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable bedrail safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agree and undertake an unannounced joint monitoring visit, including review of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and Best Interest decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“reference as part of the wider sharing of lessons. Through our care home governance framework, the health board will continue to monitor the standards of care and treatment provided to Powys residents. A planned date for a joint monitoring visit with Powys County Council was in place but was subsequently postponed whilst the regular visits from the Health and Safety Executive and Care Inspectorate Wales took place. Importantly, a new date is currently being agreed for the visit which will be unannounced. The team that undertakes review visits has also been strengthened with a new addition to the team representing pharmacy and medicines management.”

Source location

2019-0246-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to the GP outlining expectations for timely attendance, transparency, contemporaneous records, documented management discussions, DNACPR decisions, and relevant GMC guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm Mr Parry is writing to the General Practitioner concerned with the intention of outlining the following:”

Source location

2019-0246-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing GMC guidance is considered sufficient for doctors’ capacity and DNACPR decisions, so a separate policy is not needed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In reference to ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR)’ orders, Mr Parry has highlighted the considerations here in relation to the doctor’s role. The doctor needs to be aware (if they are not already) of the GMC guidance https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/treatment-and-care-towards-the-end-of-life on both lack of mental capacity (paras 15 and 16) and DNACPR (paras 129-136). Both sections highlight the need for discussion with carers/family members and related care givers and the need to be clear on the process and justification of, any decisions that are made about the individual patient. Although it is suggested a policy is constructed around these, it is in fact the case that this already exists insofar as it would relate to doctors in this scenario, and this is within the referenced GMC guidance above.”

Source location

2019-0246-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Strengthen the review-visit team by adding pharmacy and medicines-management representation.

    Stated by Powys Teaching Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2019.
  2. 2

    Continue monitoring standards of care and treatment for Powys residents through the care home governance framework.

    Stated by Powys Teaching Local Health BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen the review-visit team by adding pharmacy and medicines-management representation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“reference as part of the wider sharing of lessons. Through our care home governance framework, the health board will continue to monitor the standards of care and treatment provided to Powys residents. A planned date for a joint monitoring visit with Powys County Council was in place but was subsequently postponed whilst the regular visits from the Health and Safety Executive and Care Inspectorate Wales took place. Importantly, a new date is currently being agreed for the visit which will be unannounced. The team that undertakes review visits has also been strengthened with a new addition to the team representing pharmacy and medicines management.”

Source location

2019-0246-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring standards of care and treatment for Powys residents through the care home governance framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“reference as part of the wider sharing of lessons. Through our care home governance framework, the health board will continue to monitor the standards of care and treatment provided to Powys residents. A planned date for a joint monitoring visit with Powys County Council was in place but was subsequently postponed whilst the regular visits from the Health and Safety Executive and Care Inspectorate Wales took place. Importantly, a new date is currently being agreed for the visit which will be unannounced. The team that undertakes review visits has also been strengthened with a new addition to the team representing pharmacy and medicines management.”

Source location

2019-0246-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026