PFD report

Antonio Galisi-Swallow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Jan 2026•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of national guidance for propofol use for short-term sedation in children and young people on PICUs
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for safe propofol use
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Produce a joint specialist position statement on propofol use in paediatric critical care for publication on participating organisations’ websites.

    Stated by Paediatric Critical Care SocietyStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 December 2025.
  2. Action

    Introduce a mandatory PCCS Quality Standards requirement for Level 3 units to maintain an agreed local guideline for propofol use.

    Stated by Paediatric Critical Care SocietyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 December 2025.
  3. Action

    Support development and implementation of the position statement and standards actions so paediatric intensive care units establish safe propofol-use arrangements.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 December 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Developing national propofol guidance for paediatric intensive care is not within the appropriate organisational role.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for propofol use for short-term sedation in children and young people on PICUs

Wider context from the report

“During the inquest, the court was told that there is no national guidance for the use of propofol for short term sedation in children and young people on PICU’s. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for safe propofol use.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce a joint specialist position statement on propofol use in paediatric critical care for publication on participating organisations’ websites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PCCS has convened a specialist group including paediatric intensivists, anaesthetists and pharmacists, with representation from PCCS, the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA) and the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG). This group is producing a joint position statement on the use of propofol in paediatric critical care. We expect to publish this on our respective websites in the Summer of 2026.”

Source location

Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a mandatory PCCS Quality Standards requirement for Level 3 units to maintain an agreed local guideline for propofol use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the scheduled update to the PCCS Quality Standards (Version 7), we will introduce a mandatory minimum standard requiring all Level 3 paediatric critical care units to have an agreed local guideline for propofol use. This revision will be published later this year.”

Source location

Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support development and implementation of the position statement and standards actions so paediatric intensive care units establish safe propofol-use arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England will support with the development and implementation of the actions to ensure all PICUs have appropriate arrangements in place for the safe use of propofol. Action 2 allows engagement with the relevant professional groups (anaesthetists and pharmacy) and is a formal communication to ensure units take swift action without waiting for the longer-term action of the overall standards re-write (Action 3 listed above).”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a requirement to the next PCCS standards that every paediatric intensive care unit have a local propofol-use guideline.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The next iteration of the PCCS standards (Version 7 is currently under development) will include a specific requirement that all PCC units must have a local guideline for the use of propofol in PICU. (Expected completion date: end of 2026)”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Developing national propofol guidance for paediatric intensive care is not within the appropriate organisational role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The patient safety leads at NICE have discussed the report and understand that your request is that we develop national guidance on propofol for short term sedation in children and young people on paediatric intensive care units (PICUs).”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England or the Paediatric Critical Care Society should address propofol guidance and consider requiring local PICU protocols.

Verbatim wording from the response

“prescribe, review and monitoring details, and limitations on use). As these issues will vary by locality, they are best described in local guidance.”

Source location

Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual PICU services are responsible for developing local propofol guidance under professional and commissioning standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England commission PICU services in line with Paediatric Critical Care Society (PCCS) standards. Standard L3-505 lists clinical guidance that each PICU should have in use and these include ‘Drug administration and medicines management’ and ‘Procedural sedation and analgesia’. PICU services are responsible for developing their own local guidelines as a requirement of PCCS standards.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing mandated local PICU protocols are considered sufficient because they can address patient selection, contraindications, prescribing and monitoring requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have had sight of Professor ████████ response to your Report and concur with him that the above does not mean that propofol cannot be used in clinical practice as many drugs are not licensed for use in children due to a lack of specific paediatric research evidence. However, use of these types of drugs should be supported by strong local protocols. Such protocols should include patient selection, contraindications, cautions, and local prescribing issues (such as who can prescribe, review and monitoring details, and limitations on use).”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Inform PCCS members about PRIS risks and the need for local propofol-use guidance in paediatric critical care units.

    Stated by Paediatric Critical Care SocietyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 December 2025.
  2. 2

    Share a President’s message with PCCS members highlighting the Regulation 28 Report and risk of propofol infusion syndrome.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 December 2025.
  3. 3

    Produce and publish a position statement on propofol use in paediatric intensive care, in collaboration with pharmacy and anaesthesia professional groups.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 December 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inform PCCS members about PRIS risks and the need for local propofol-use guidance in paediatric critical care units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have informed all PCCS members—over 1300 multidisciplinary professionals across the UK—of the risk of Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome (PRIS). In this communication, we highlighted the issues raised in your report and referenced the case. We also emphasised the need for every paediatric critical care unit to maintain local guidance for the use of propofol in PCC. This communication was disseminated in February 2026.”

Source location

Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share a President’s message with PCCS members highlighting the Regulation 28 Report and risk of propofol infusion syndrome.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The PCCS communications team has shared a "President's message" - an email bulletin to all PCCS members ( professionals actively involved in or contributing to paediatric critical care, including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals) referencing the Regulation 28 Report and the risk of propofol infusion syndrome in PICUs. This has been completed as of February 2026.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce and publish a position statement on propofol use in paediatric intensive care, in collaboration with pharmacy and anaesthesia professional groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. PCCS will produce a position statement on the use of propofol in Paediatric Intensive Care to formally raise awareness amongst the PICU community. This will be produced in collaboration with the National Paediatric Pharmacy Group (NPPG) and the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA). This statement will be shared with all PCCS members and hosted on the PCCS website. (Expected completion date: Summer 2026).”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026