PFD report

Wayne Boughen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Jun 2021•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Ordinary cells enabling suspension using prison-issued clothing as ligatures
  2. Failure to provide cells certified as safer cells in accordance with national standards
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient availability of certified safer cells for prisoners at risk of self-harm
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Work with the maintenance contractor to identify further opportunities to reduce ligature points in cells.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 June 2021.
  2. Action

    Monitor implementation of the revised ACCT process at HMP Leeds and provide regular feedback to managers and staff.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 June 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Fully compliant safer cells do not eliminate suicide or self-harm risk and are not sufficient alone to protect prisoners.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ordinary cells enabling suspension using prison-issued clothing as ligatures

Wider context from the report

“4. In an ordinary cell, Wayne Boughen was able to suspend himself using a ligature fashioned from a prison issue jumper. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide cells certified as safer cells in accordance with national standards

Wider context from the report

“1. At the time of Wayne Boughen’s death, HMP Leeds did not have any cells which were certified safer cells (anti-ligature cells) in accordance with national standards. 2. HMP Leeds still does not have any such certified safer cells. 3. HMP Leeds has a small number of cells which have an increased level of safety as compared with the majority of cells within the prison, but even they do not comply with the certified safer cell standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient availability of certified safer cells for prisoners at risk of self-harm.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the maintenance contractor to identify further opportunities to reduce ligature points in cells.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Many older establishments, including HMP Leeds, are built in a way that it makes it impossible to refurbish most cells in a way that fully meets every aspect of the safer cell specification. For this reason there is no requirement in our policy for prisons to have, or to use, safer cells. Nonetheless the Governor of HMP Leeds is committed to improving the safety of the available accommodation where possible, and will continue to work with Amey, the maintenance contractor, to identify opportunities for further work to reduce the availability of ligature points in cells.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor implementation of the revised ACCT process at HMP Leeds and provide regular feedback to managers and staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This includes consideration of the prisoner’s location, and the option to remove or restrict access to items that may be used as ligatures and/or the provision of alternative clothing. If risk is considered to be very high, levels of observation can be increased, and for those in acute crisis, constant supervision can be deployed. Implementation of the new version of ACCT at HMP Leeds is being monitored carefully by the Governor and safety team, with regular feedback to managers and individual staff highlighting any need for improvement and good practice where appropriate. I am confident that these measures will improve the operation of the ACCT process at HMP Leeds.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fully compliant safer cells do not eliminate suicide or self-harm risk and are not sufficient alone to protect prisoners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I fully appreciate your concerns and would like to reassure you that we are committed to ensuring that prisoners in our care, particularly those who are considered to be at a risk of suicide or self-harm, are located in the safest environment possible. We recognise that cell safety is an important part of managing prisoners at risk, and wherever possible new builds and major refurbishment projects are delivered to the published safer cell specification. However we also know that placing someone who has been identified as being at risk in a safer cell that is fully compliant with the standard does not fully eliminate that risk. We therefore believe that whilst safer cells can be of assistance, they are not sufficient on their own to protect prisoners.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Older establishments, including HMP Leeds, cannot refurbish most cells to fully meet every aspect of the safer cell specification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Many older establishments, including HMP Leeds, are built in a way that it makes it impossible to refurbish most cells in a way that fully meets every aspect of the safer cell specification. For this reason there is no requirement in our policy for prisons to have, or to use, safer cells. Nonetheless the Governor of HMP Leeds is committed to improving the safety of the available accommodation where possible, and will continue to work with Amey, the maintenance contractor, to identify opportunities for further work to reduce the availability of ligature points in cells.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Introduce the revised ACCT process across HMP Leeds and the male prison estate.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 June 2021.
  2. 2

    Provide role-specific awareness training to all HMP Leeds staff on revised ACCT procedures and responsibilities.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 June 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Individualised, multidisciplinary ACCT case management and related safety measures are considered sufficient to safely manage prisoners at risk.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce the revised ACCT process across HMP Leeds and the male prison estate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the inquest a revised version of the ACCT has been fully introduced across the male estate, including at HMP Leeds. All staff at the prison have received awareness training specific to their roles and responsibilities and to highlight the key changes to the procedures. Some of the improvements made to the ACCT document are designed to lead to a better standard of record keeping and to ensure that key risk information is highlighted more clearly on a form that is updated throughout the process and encourages more meaningful interaction with prisoners at risk. An individualised assessment, considering risks, triggers and protective factors, is completed and used to produce an appropriate care plan setting out the support being offered to the individual concerned.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide role-specific awareness training to all HMP Leeds staff on revised ACCT procedures and responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the inquest a revised version of the ACCT has been fully introduced across the male estate, including at HMP Leeds. All staff at the prison have received awareness training specific to their roles and responsibilities and to highlight the key changes to the procedures. Some of the improvements made to the ACCT document are designed to lead to a better standard of record keeping and to ensure that key risk information is highlighted more clearly on a form that is updated throughout the process and encourages more meaningful interaction with prisoners at risk. An individualised assessment, considering risks, triggers and protective factors, is completed and used to produce an appropriate care plan setting out the support being offered to the individual concerned.”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individualised, multidisciplinary ACCT case management and related safety measures are considered sufficient to safely manage prisoners at risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe that the best way to protect prisoners at risk is through the individualised, multi-disciplinary case management provided by the Assessment, Care in Custody Teamwork (ACCT) process https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/managing-prisoner-safety-in-custody-psi-642011”

Source location

2021-0217-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026