PFD report

Mitica Mihaita Ladunca · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jun 2020•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Absence of signage warning drivers on the A322 of the pedestrian crossing point linking to Swift Lane across both carriageways
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Install advance signage at the uncontrolled crossing to warn drivers that pedestrians may cross.

    Stated by Surrey County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 August 2020.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of signage warning drivers on the A322 of the pedestrian crossing point linking to Swift Lane across both carriageways

Wider context from the report

“- There is an absence of signage warning drivers on the A322 that there is a crossing point for pedestrians which links to Swift Lane across both carriageways. - Consideration should be given to introducing such signage. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install advance signage at the uncontrolled crossing to warn drivers that pedestrians may cross.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of your report the Area Highway Manager has reviewed the location and while it is clear that your findings are that lack of signage did not contribute to this fatality he will install advance signage at this location. He is pleased to confirm that this work will go ahead on 29/30 September. This will be coordinated with the County’s high speed Traffic Management programme.”

Source location

Response from Surrey County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 August 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026