PFD report

Muhammed Saif Abdul Haleem · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Sep 2019•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to maintain current information for immediate guidance to paramedics
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable provision of safety-critical patient information to paramedics
  2. Lack of communication of existing DNA-CPRs or Advance Care Plans between community paediatric teams and emergency services
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services
  3. Failure to ensure immediate guidance is known to and supported by clinicians
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Review archived records for children with palliative care needs to identify advance care plans predating the electronic system and include them in alerts.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Place alerts on the NWAS system for children with current advance care plans and review them when changed or at least annually.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 November 2019.
  3. Action

    Communicate current advance care plan information and provide child lists to relevant hospital children’s services to support replication of alert systems.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 November 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Reviewing and communicating changes to DNA-CPR decisions remains the responsibility of the patient’s referring clinician or GP practice.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain current information for immediate guidance to paramedics

Wider context from the report

“That information held on the NWAS system for the purpose of providing immediate guidance to paramedics was 7 years out-of-date and was not known to or supported by the clinicians involved in this child’s care at the time of his death. Whilst I accept the evidence that paramedics will make a clinical decision based on the patient’s presentation at the time, the fact that they sought advice around the existence of a DNA-CPR indicates that it is a relevant factor in their decision-making The evidence was that the number of children living in the community with DNA-CPRs in place is small and there should be communication between the community paediatric teams and emergency services of any DNA-CPRs or Advance Care Plans that are in existence and are ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable provision of safety-critical patient information to paramedics.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of communication of existing DNA-CPRs or Advance Care Plans between community paediatric teams and emergency services

Wider context from the report

“That information held on the NWAS system for the purpose of providing immediate guidance to paramedics was 7 years out-of-date and was not known to or supported by the clinicians involved in this child’s care at the time of his death. Whilst I accept the evidence that paramedics will make a clinical decision based on the patient’s presentation at the time, the fact that they sought advice around the existence of a DNA-CPR indicates that it is a relevant factor in their decision-making The evidence was that the number of children living in the community with DNA-CPRs in place is small and there should be communication between the community paediatric teams and emergency services of any DNA-CPRs or Advance Care Plans that are in existence and are ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure immediate guidance is known to and supported by clinicians

Wider context from the report

“That information held on the NWAS system for the purpose of providing immediate guidance to paramedics was 7 years out-of-date and was not known to or supported by the clinicians involved in this child’s care at the time of his death. Whilst I accept the evidence that paramedics will make a clinical decision based on the patient’s presentation at the time, the fact that they sought advice around the existence of a DNA-CPR indicates that it is a relevant factor in their decision-making The evidence was that the number of children living in the community with DNA-CPRs in place is small and there should be communication between the community paediatric teams and emergency services of any DNA-CPRs or Advance Care Plans that are in existence and are ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review archived records for children with palliative care needs to identify advance care plans predating the electronic system and include them in alerts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that alerts have now been placed on the NWAS system for all children who have current advance care plans (ACP) - these alerts will be reviewed if any changes are made or as a minimum once per year when the ACP is reviewed. In addition, we will review archived patient notes/records for any children with palliative care needs known to the Children’s Community Nursing Team (CCNT) on 15/11/19 to ensure that any ACP’s that may have commenced before the electronic system was set up are included.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-Pennine-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Place alerts on the NWAS system for children with current advance care plans and review them when changed or at least annually.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that alerts have now been placed on the NWAS system for all children who have current advance care plans (ACP) - these alerts will be reviewed if any changes are made or as a minimum once per year when the ACP is reviewed. In addition, we will review archived patient notes/records for any children with palliative care needs known to the Children’s Community Nursing Team (CCNT) on 15/11/19 to ensure that any ACP’s that may have commenced before the electronic system was set up are included.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-Pennine-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate current advance care plan information and provide child lists to relevant hospital children’s services to support replication of alert systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also communicated with the Lead Nurse at the Royal Oldham Hospital Children’s A&E department and forwarded a list of the children known to CCNT who have ACP’s to enable them to set up their own alert system. We have also communicated with the Oldham Children’s unit and O&A to replicate the same system.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-Pennine-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reviewing and communicating changes to DNA-CPR decisions remains the responsibility of the patient’s referring clinician or GP practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility of review of a DNA-CPR remains with the patient’s referring clinician. If a DNACPR is revoked, in the same way as the agreement is communicated, NWAS would expect the GP practice to communicate the change. If this does not happen, the DNA-CPR marker on the Trust system that remains in place is a warning of the potential existence of a DNA-CPR, which directs the clinician to look for a paper copy of the DNA-CPR when on scene. NWAS policy stipulates the commencement of resuscitation until information can be confirmed. NWAS should also receive requests from GP practices to remove a DNA-CPR marker when a patient has passed away.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Review DNA-CPR and other system markers and make recommendations for improvement.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 November 2019.
  2. 2

    Develop and implement a system to identify DNA-CPR markers that are outdated or require review.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review DNA-CPR and other system markers and make recommendations for improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Regulation 28 report has prompted much investigation and discussion both internally and with the Trust commissioners about not only DNA-CPR markers but other markers which are maintained on the Trust’s system.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement a system to identify DNA-CPR markers that are outdated or require review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is accepted that the NWAS needs to develop and implement a system which ensures that the NWAS is aware where DNA-CPR markers are out of date and/or require a review. The solution, however, is not a simple one. Consideration has been given to the block deletion of all DNA-CPR markers which are over 12 months old, however this will require careful consideration of the impact this may have on the wider health system and also, appropriate opportunity for the Trust to communicate with GPs and the like about the proposed action.”

Source location

2019-0316-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026