PFD report

John Edward Kay · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Aug 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of understanding of the specialist nurse service role and support
  2. Failure to arrange regular valve monitoring and replacement
  3. Failure to share valve-care information with care homes
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Share information on valve management and specialist nurse availability with Stockport GPs.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of understanding of the specialist nurse service role and support

Wider context from the report

“2. The role and support available from the specialist nurse service was not understood within the community including by the GP. Greater understanding and awareness of that role would have been helpful in managing Mr Kay and reducing the risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to arrange regular valve monitoring and replacement

Wider context from the report

“1. The Inquest heard evidence that the management of a patient with a valve such as Mr Kay had is a complex one. It requires regular monitoring and replacement. The evidence was that when he went into a care home that information about how to care for his valve was not shared with the care home. The consequence was that he was not seen or referred for regular replacements of the valve which increased the risk of the valve not functioning correctly and him developing aspiration pneumonia; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share valve-care information with care homes

Wider context from the report

“1. The Inquest heard evidence that the management of a patient with a valve such as Mr Kay had is a complex one. It requires regular monitoring and replacement. The evidence was that when he went into a care home that information about how to care for his valve was not shared with the care home. The consequence was that he was not seen or referred for regular replacements of the valve which increased the risk of the valve not functioning correctly and him developing aspiration pneumonia; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share information on valve management and specialist nurse availability with Stockport GPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, this case has highlighted a potential gap in knowledge in relation to GPs and it has been arranged for a briefing paper to be shared across the Stockport GP population setting down information about the management of these valves and the availability of the specialist nurse.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Present learning from the case to the Greater Manchester System Quality Group.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2022.
  2. 2

    Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2022.
  3. 3

    Cascade shared learning from this and similar cases to professionals through governance and learning forums.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 September 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing patient education, family knowledge and specialist support were considered sufficient; the team correctly accepted the patient’s decision to decline other preventive strategies.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present learning from the case to the Greater Manchester System Quality Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions taken or being taken to share learning across Greater Manchester. ████████”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conclusion, key learning points and recommendations will be monitored to ensure they are embedded within practice. NHS GM is committed to improving outcomes for the population of Greater Manchester.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cascade shared learning from this and similar cases to professionals through governance and learning forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions taken or being taken to share learning across Greater Manchester. ████████”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing patient education, family knowledge and specialist support were considered sufficient; the team correctly accepted the patient’s decision to decline other preventive strategies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ Clinical Lead reviewed this case and was satisfied that Mr Kay was well educated in relation to the management of his valve and that his NOK was also knowledgeable about how and when to seek assistance. They were further satisfied that as Mr Kay had capacity to make decisions for himself, the team acted correctly in accepting his decision to decline other strategies to prevent a leak resulting in aspiration.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026