PFD report

Samuel Lewis Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Dec 2023•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of flagging of and access to key dates affecting prisoners’ safety
  2. Lack of national guidance for managing in-possession medication
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to secure and control medication
  3. Failure of NOMIS information accessibility to support risk assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable NOMIS safety-critical information access and visibility
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Share learning from HMP Portland’s key-date screening process with regional health and justice commissioners and request dissemination to healthcare providers.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Issue supporting staff guidance on providing suitable, coordinated care during key-date trigger periods.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Require medication removal during cell clearances through the amended Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    HMPPS is responsible for conducting cell searches where there are concerns that prisoners may be hoarding or stockpiling medication.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of flagging of and access to key dates affecting prisoners’ safety

Wider context from the report

“i. The lack of flagging of, and access to, key dates which may have an impact on prisoners’ safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for managing in-possession medication

Wider context from the report

“iv. The lack of national guidance around the operation of in possession medication in prisons either by HMPPS or NHS England to ensure prisoners do not stockpile or retain medication when they have stopped using it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to secure and control medication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of NOMIS information accessibility to support risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“iii. The accessibility of information recorded on NOMIS and the potential to miss key information which could impact on risk assessments. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable NOMIS safety-critical information access and visibility.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance for managing safety risks associated with key dates

Wider context from the report

“ii. The lack of national Prison Service or NHS guidance on how to manage key dates where risks to the safety of the prisoner may be increased, such as a bereavement or traumatic incident or any other key dates. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from HMP Portland’s key-date screening process with regional health and justice commissioners and request dissemination to healthcare providers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note you reference in the report that in response to the learning from this incident, a local process has been put in place by HMP Portland to ‘ensure prisoners will be asked about any significant or trigger dates at the initial and second healthcare screen when they arrive at prison’. As you have identified this as good practice, NHS England will contact HMP Portland to obtain more information, and share this learning and subsequent action with regional health and justice commissioners, requesting they bring this to the attention of their own healthcare providers.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue supporting staff guidance on providing suitable, coordinated care during key-date trigger periods.

Verbatim wording from the response

“importance of recording information about such dates. We know that many prisons maintain local databases for this purpose. The importance of awareness that key dates may be triggers will also be made clear in the new Safety Policy Framework that we will shortly be issuing, which will be supported with guidance for staff about how to provide suitable, co-ordinated care during such trigger periods. In the meantime, we will issue a Senior Leaders Bulletin on the importance of recognising key dates and encouraging the use of local databases.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require medication removal during cell clearances through the amended Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In these circumstances prison staff are permitted to remove medication as an unauthorised item in accordance with the Searching Policy Framework, and the Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework has recently been amended to require the removal of medication during cell clearances.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop Digital Prison Services as the replacement case management system, including core functionality needed to cease using NOMIS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning first to your concerns about key dates, as you know, NOMIS allows information to be shared throughout the system both within an establishment and nationally. We recognise that NOMIS, is no longer fit for purpose, and are currently developing a new case management system, Digital Prison Services (DPS). Whilst neither NOMIS nor DPS is currently able to record key dates, this is something that we will revisit as we continue to develop DPS. Our main focus for now, is to build the core functionality that is needed in DPS in order to enable us to cease the use of NOMIS.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a new Safety Policy Framework clarifying the importance of recognising key dates as potential triggers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“importance of recording information about such dates. We know that many prisons maintain local databases for this purpose. The importance of awareness that key dates may be triggers will also be made clear in the new Safety Policy Framework that we will shortly be issuing, which will be supported with guidance for staff about how to provide suitable, co-ordinated care during such trigger periods. In the meantime, we will issue a Senior Leaders Bulletin on the importance of recognising key dates and encouraging the use of local databases.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revisit recording key dates in Digital Prison Services as its development continues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning first to your concerns about key dates, as you know, NOMIS allows information to be shared throughout the system both within an establishment and nationally. We recognise that NOMIS, is no longer fit for purpose, and are currently developing a new case management system, Digital Prison Services (DPS). Whilst neither NOMIS nor DPS is currently able to record key dates, this is something that we will revisit as we continue to develop DPS. Our main focus for now, is to build the core functionality that is needed in DPS in order to enable us to cease the use of NOMIS.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a Senior Leaders Bulletin on recognising key dates and encouraging use of local databases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“importance of recording information about such dates. We know that many prisons maintain local databases for this purpose. The importance of awareness that key dates may be triggers will also be made clear in the new Safety Policy Framework that we will shortly be issuing, which will be supported with guidance for staff about how to provide suitable, co-ordinated care during such trigger periods. In the meantime, we will issue a Senior Leaders Bulletin on the importance of recognising key dates and encouraging the use of local databases.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider adding keyword searching to Digital Prison Services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to your third concern I have acknowledged above that NOMIS is not fit for purpose and explained that we are working on the development of DPS as a replacement. NOMIS does, however, provide the capacity for staff to search notes in various ways, including by type, subtype and date. The ability to search for key words is currently under consideration in the development of DPS, and we anticipate that this function will be available by 2025.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HMPPS is responsible for conducting cell searches where there are concerns that prisoners may be hoarding or stockpiling medication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Had any concerns been raised that Samuel may have been hoarding or stockpiling his medication (Sertraline), responsibility for a cell search lies with HMPPS. NHS England contacted HMPPS to discuss this matter of concern and it has been confirmed this will be addressed in the direct response from the HMPPS Director General.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

HMPPS is responsible for responding to concerns about national guidance and the accessibility of key information recorded on NOMIS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is my understanding that ████████, Director General for His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is intending to write to you directly in response to the matters highlighted in concerns two and three.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operational concerns should be addressed by HMPPS Director General of Operations, rather than by the Minister.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The concerns you have raised within your report are operational issues and it is therefore appropriate for ████████, DG Operations, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), to respond to them. I have seen the response from ████████ and I endorse the content of it, which sets out the action being taken by HMPPS to address your concerns.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Justice
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NOMIS and DPS currently lack key-date recording and keyword-search functions while DPS core development is prioritised; these enhancements are planned or under consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning first to your concerns about key dates, as you know, NOMIS allows information to be shared throughout the system both within an establishment and nationally. We recognise that NOMIS, is no longer fit for purpose, and are currently developing a new case management system, Digital Prison Services (DPS). Whilst neither NOMIS nor DPS is currently able to record key dates, this is something that we will revisit as we continue to develop DPS. Our main focus for now, is to build the core functionality that is needed in DPS in order to enable us to cease the use of NOMIS.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Healthcare providers primarily decide which medication prisoners may hold in possession, although prison staff retain supporting responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regard to your final concern, decisions about which medication can be issued to be held in possession by prisoners are primarily a matter for healthcare providers, but prison staff have a role to play, and this area in which collaborative working and appropriate information sharing are crucial. There are a number of prison policies that cover the stockpiling of medication, or its retention after an individual has ceased a course of treatment. Depending on the circumstances, healthcare staff may consider further treatment or intervention or it could constitute possession of an unauthorised item, which would be an offence against prison discipline as set out in the Adjudications Policy Framework.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning nationally and regionally and identify emerging trends requiring review or action.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning nationally and regionally and identify emerging trends requiring review or action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures key learning and insights around events are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 8 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026