Investigation and inquest
On 11 November 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of John Robert ELLIS aged 35. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 November 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was that:
The deceased was a highly regarded young veterinary surgeon, who was experiencing difficulties in some of his personal relationships, as well as financial worries and considerable stress as a result of having recently changed jobs. On Sunday 06/11/22, he used an intravenous line to self-administer a toxic quantity of ████████ which he had procured by falsely representing to his former employers that he needed it in order to euthanise a large dog. He was able to access the drug, which he knew to be dangerous, without being challenged as to its purpose. He intended to take his own life and was found deceased in the shower cubicle at ████████ shortly before midnight.
Circumstances of the death
The deceased was a highly regarded young veterinary surgeon, who was experiencing difficulties in some of his personal relationships, as well as financial worries and considerable stress as a result of having recently changed jobs. On Sunday 06/11/22, he used an intravenous line to self-administer a toxic quantity of ████████ which he had procured by falsely representing to his former employers that he needed it in order to euthanise a large dog. He was able to access the drug, which he knew to be dangerous, without being challenged as to its purpose. He intended to take his own life and was found deceased in the shower cubicle at ████████ shortly before midnight.
Coroner’s concerns
Veterinary surgeons, such as the deceased, are able to easily access potentially lethal drugs, such as ████████ (which is a Schedule 3 Controlled Drug) without any adequate controls being put in place to prevent their misuse. The deceased in this case was able to invent a story to the effect that he needed the drug in order to carry out a home visit, the purported purpose of which was to euthanise a large dog. He was given 50ml of ████████ by his former employers, without any checks having first been made to verify his account of why it was needed and without scrutiny by another veterinary surgeon. He was allowed to walk out of the veterinary surgery unaccompanied, with the drug, which he then used to take his own life by means of an intravenous drip.