PFD report

Noleen Mary McPHARLANE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Aug 2014•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to directly assess thoughts of taking one's life
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate mental health risk assessmentPart of recurring concern: Incomplete clinical history-takingPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
  2. Shortened clinical specialist sessions
  3. Failure to assess and address ongoing excessive use of illicit amitriptyline
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical management of medication overdose and toxicity
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Update the clinical risk assessment and management policy.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  2. Action

    Instruct clinical staff to assess risks to self and others and address identified risks in care plans.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  3. Action

    Raise with supervisors that risk-assessment content must be checked during supervision.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 August 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to directly assess thoughts of taking one's life

Wider context from the report

“1. Ms McPharlane had a long history of overdoses and self inflicted wounds, her last admission to hospital for treatment for the consequent physical injuries being in May 2013. However, in the year following that until her death, the clinical specialist who looked after never once asked her directly if she had thoughts of taking her life. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate mental health risk assessment; Incomplete clinical history-taking; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortened clinical specialist sessions

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical specialist, ████████, by profession a mental health nurse, saw Noleen McPharlane once a fortnight. The sessions were scheduled to last 50 minutes, but frequently only lasted 20 or 30 minutes. He told me that this was because she did not initiate conversation and responded to questions only briefly. He did not feel he had a good rapport with her. No other health professional from Highgate Hospital saw her. ████████ did speak to his manager, another clinical specialist (by profession a social worker) about Ms McPharlane, and twice over the year to a psychiatrist. However, there was never any exploration of the possible therapeutic benefit of direct input from an alternative healthcare professional. ████████ now thinks that would have been appropriate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess and address ongoing excessive use of illicit amitriptyline

Wider context from the report

“2. The medical records made clear that Ms McPharlane had a history of buying illicit amitriptyline from the internet and taking this to excess. However, in the last year of her life, her clinical specialist never once asked her if this was ongoing, or advised her about this, or explored the issue with her in any way. He now regards this as unacceptable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical management of medication overdose and toxicity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to explore therapeutic input from an alternative healthcare professional

Wider context from the report

“3. The clinical specialist, ████████, by profession a mental health nurse, saw Noleen McPharlane once a fortnight. The sessions were scheduled to last 50 minutes, but frequently only lasted 20 or 30 minutes. He told me that this was because she did not initiate conversation and responded to questions only briefly. He did not feel he had a good rapport with her. No other health professional from Highgate Hospital saw her. ████████ did speak to his manager, another clinical specialist (by profession a social worker) about Ms McPharlane, and twice over the year to a psychiatrist. However, there was never any exploration of the possible therapeutic benefit of direct input from an alternative healthcare professional. ████████ now thinks that would have been appropriate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable therapeutic engagement in mental health care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the clinical risk assessment and management policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has a clinical risk assessment and management policy in place. It has been reviewed and updated in September 2014 and is currently being consulted upon. The Trust believes that effective risk assessment and management is crucial to the delivery of high quality services across all parts of the Trust and is a core component of mental”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct clinical staff to assess risks to self and others and address identified risks in care plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Director of Nursing & People and the Interim Medical Director will ensure that all clinical staff are instructed to ensure that the risk assessments of all services users include asking about risks to self and others and, if risks are identified, that these are addressed in care plans. The deadline for this is November 2014.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise with supervisors that risk-assessment content must be checked during supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of the Personality Disorders Service will raise with supervisors in the service that the content of risk assessments are checked during supervision.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct clinical staff to discuss known self-harm methods, monitor related practices and medication risks, and set preventive care-plan actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Interim Medical Director will ensure that all clinical staff are instructed that where it is known the methods of self-harm service users employ, including the purchase of non-prescribed medication through the internet, they must have these practices discussed with them regularly. A plan should be set in place to include monitoring the frequency of these practices, e.g. the medication purchased and consideration given to the impact of this on their prescribed medication and the likelihood of overdosing. The care plan should set out clear actions to be taken to prevent self-harming practices where possible. The deadline for this is November 2014.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Share the investigation recommendations with the deceased’s mother, involved staff and the wider organisation.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  2. 2

    Provide additional supervision and support from a senior staff member to the clinical worker.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  3. 3

    Complete the internal investigation into the serious untoward incident.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  4. 4

    Require teams to discuss the therapeutic impact and benefits of care and monitor this through individual supervision.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  5. 5

    Strengthen processes requiring clinical dashboards to be accessed during supervision and at other times to check that risk assessments are current.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  6. 6

    Consult staff on the updated clinical risk assessment and management policy.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 August 2014.
  7. 7

    Establish procedures to monitor documentation, risk-assessment and care-plan updates, and formal service-user reviews.

    Stated by North London NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 August 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the investigation recommendations with the deceased’s mother, involved staff and the wider organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As with all serious untoward incidents in the Trust, our policy requires an internal investigation. This investigation has now been completed and recommendations made. This will be shared with Ms McPharlane’s mother, the staff involved in the case and the organisation more widely. The implementation of the recommendations is the responsibility of named managers.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide additional supervision and support from a senior staff member to the clinical worker.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of the Personality Disorders Service had recognised that the clinical worker had performance issues and the manager has organised and put in place additional supervision and support for him from a senior staff member. This is ongoing.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the internal investigation into the serious untoward incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As with all serious untoward incidents in the Trust, our policy requires an internal investigation. This investigation has now been completed and recommendations made. This will be shared with Ms McPharlane’s mother, the staff involved in the case and the organisation more widely. The implementation of the recommendations is the responsibility of named managers.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require teams to discuss the therapeutic impact and benefits of care and monitor this through individual supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of the Personality Disorders Service will ensure that teams discuss the therapeutic impact and benefits of the care provided to service users specifically ensuring that it is meeting the needs of the service user and is having a positive impact on their mental health. This will be monitored through individual supervision. The deadline for this is November 2014.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen processes requiring clinical dashboards to be accessed during supervision and at other times to check that risk assessments are current.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has a clinical dashboard that is populated from the electronic patient record system which alerts team managers when risk assessments are out of date. The head of the Personality Disorders Service has strengthened processes in the team that clinical dashboards are accessed during supervision and at other times to check that risk assessments are up to date.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult staff on the updated clinical risk assessment and management policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has a clinical risk assessment and management policy in place. It has been reviewed and updated in September 2014 and is currently being consulted upon. The Trust believes that effective risk assessment and management is crucial to the delivery of high quality services across all parts of the Trust and is a core component of mental”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish procedures to monitor documentation, risk-assessment and care-plan updates, and formal service-user reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Head of the Personality Disorders Service will ensure that there are procedures in place to monitor the quality of documentation, including updating risk assessments and care plans and ensuring the formal review of service users in line with Trust policy. The deadline for this is November 2014.”

Source location

2014-0370-Response-by-Camden-Islington-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 7 August 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026