PFD report

Madison James Bruce SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Mar 2026•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Increased risk of sudden unexpected death from prone sleeping in young babies
  2. Failure to restrict use of the term nurse to registered nurses
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to protect safety-critical healthcare professional titles
  3. Lack of required formal training or medical qualifications for maternity service providers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Create a protection-of-title offence criminalising unregistered use of the title “nurse”, subject to specified exemptions.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. Action

    Continue working with professional, governmental, trade union and social care stakeholders to develop the protection-of-title offence.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  3. Action

    Seek views on which roles should be exempted from the new protection-of-title offence.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increased risk of sudden unexpected death from prone sleeping in young babies

Wider context from the report

“3.The inquest was told that the promotion of prone sleeping by unqualified individuals describing themselves as maternity nurses and experts in sleep poses a very significant risk to a young baby. A baby will sleep more deeply in a prone position which is why superficially it can seem to be a solution where a baby sleeps poorly. However, whenever a young baby is placed in such a position it will increase the risk that they will die suddenly and unexpectedly. All health professionals need to be vigilant in continuing to emphasise the national guidance on safe sleeping and be vigilant in flagging up to a family that prone sleeping in a child that cannot independently turn over is not a solution to a poor sleep routine but rather is a factor that increases the risk of a sudden and unexpected death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to restrict use of the term nurse to registered nurses

Wider context from the report

“2. Anyone the inquest was told, can attach the term nurse to a word such as night/maternity/ post-natal. The inquest was told that only the term registered nurse is protected and restricted in its use. An individual who has no medical training or formal early years training can offer their services to a family with young children describing themselves as for example a maternity nurse. This can the inquest was told give a misleading impression of their expertise and skill set to a family employing them. A statutory bar on the word nurse being used by anyone other than a registered nurse on the NMC register would avoid this situation from arising. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to protect safety-critical healthcare professional titles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of required formal training or medical qualifications for maternity service providers

Wider context from the report

“1.The inquest heard evidence that there is a significant demand from families with very young children who would like to get their children into a sleep routine at an early stage. To meet that demand there are now agencies and individuals who seek to meet that demand. However, the inquest was told that there is no statutory regulation of these individuals or of the agencies. Consequently, anyone can set up an agency that purports to offer training and expertise in maternity services. They need not have any formal training or any medical qualification. The courses they offer do not need to be quality assured or meet any minimum standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of statutory regulation of maternity service agencies and individuals

Wider context from the report

“1.The inquest heard evidence that there is a significant demand from families with very young children who would like to get their children into a sleep routine at an early stage. To meet that demand there are now agencies and individuals who seek to meet that demand. However, the inquest was told that there is no statutory regulation of these individuals or of the agencies. Consequently, anyone can set up an agency that purports to offer training and expertise in maternity services. They need not have any formal training or any medical qualification. The courses they offer do not need to be quality assured or meet any minimum standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective regulatory oversight of providers serving vulnerable people.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promotion of prone sleeping by unqualified maternity and sleep providers

Wider context from the report

“3.The inquest was told that the promotion of prone sleeping by unqualified individuals describing themselves as maternity nurses and experts in sleep poses a very significant risk to a young baby. A baby will sleep more deeply in a prone position which is why superficially it can seem to be a solution where a baby sleeps poorly. However, whenever a young baby is placed in such a position it will increase the risk that they will die suddenly and unexpectedly. All health professionals need to be vigilant in continuing to emphasise the national guidance on safe sleeping and be vigilant in flagging up to a family that prone sleeping in a child that cannot independently turn over is not a solution to a poor sleep routine but rather is a factor that increases the risk of a sudden and unexpected death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe sleeping arrangements for infants and children.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of maternity service courses to undergo quality assurance or meet minimum standards

Wider context from the report

“1.The inquest heard evidence that there is a significant demand from families with very young children who would like to get their children into a sleep routine at an early stage. To meet that demand there are now agencies and individuals who seek to meet that demand. However, the inquest was told that there is no statutory regulation of these individuals or of the agencies. Consequently, anyone can set up an agency that purports to offer training and expertise in maternity services. They need not have any formal training or any medical qualification. The courses they offer do not need to be quality assured or meet any minimum standards. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a protection-of-title offence criminalising unregistered use of the title “nurse”, subject to specified exemptions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you point out, currently, the title ‘registered nurse’ is protected in law. This is obviously not enough to safeguard the public, and we are taking action to address the misuse of the trusted title ‘nurse’ by unregulated professionals.”

Source location

2026-0179 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with professional, governmental, trade union and social care stakeholders to develop the protection-of-title offence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The term ‘nurse’ is used across multiple professions – for example, ‘dental nurse’ and ‘veterinary nurse’ – and it is not our intention to prevent the legitimate use of the title ‘nurse’ in these instances. The legislation will therefore include exemptions to allow other professionals to use the title legitimately, and later this year we will be seeking views on which roles should be exempted. The Government will continue to work with key stakeholders, including the NMC, the devolved governments, the Royal College of Nursing, trade unions, other professional representatives and the social care sector, on developing the protection of title offence.”

Source location

2026-0179 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek views on which roles should be exempted from the new protection-of-title offence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The term ‘nurse’ is used across multiple professions – for example, ‘dental nurse’ and ‘veterinary nurse’ – and it is not our intention to prevent the legitimate use of the title ‘nurse’ in these instances. The legislation will therefore include exemptions to allow other professionals to use the title legitimately, and later this year we will be seeking views on which roles should be exempted. The Government will continue to work with key stakeholders, including the NMC, the devolved governments, the Royal College of Nursing, trade unions, other professional representatives and the social care sector, on developing the protection of title offence.”

Source location

2026-0179 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026