PFD report

Afifa Qaisar · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Mar 2014•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Unavailability of an agitator for on-site platelet preparation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide required blood products promptly for transfusion
  2. Unavailability of platelets on site for transfusion
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide required blood products promptly for transfusion
  3. Failure to verify actual intravenous drug delivery when recording drug administration
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of an agitator for on-site platelet preparation

Wider context from the report

“4. I heard evidence that she required platelets to be transfused but there was a considerable delay in these being made available “because “they are not kept on site”, and in any event there is no ‘agitator’ on site for their preparation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required blood products promptly for transfusion.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of platelets on site for transfusion

Wider context from the report

“4. I heard evidence that she required platelets to be transfused but there was a considerable delay in these being made available “because “they are not kept on site”, and in any event there is no ‘agitator’ on site for their preparation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required blood products promptly for transfusion.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify actual intravenous drug delivery when recording drug administration

Wider context from the report

“1. During the course of the event it became apparent that the time of delivery/administration of various drugs was of the utmost importance. The nursing staff had completed the records to say that the drugs had been ‘given’. The Ward manager accepted that this simply meant that the drip had been ‘put up’ and did not confirm that the drug had actually been delivered into the vein of the patient. The husband of the patient contended that the ‘bag’ remained full and that he did not see any evidence that its contents were in fact administered to the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a Gum-elastic Bougie Airway on the crash trolley

Wider context from the report

“2. During resuscitation the staff wished to use a “Gum –elastic Bougie Airway” but when they looked they found it was not available on the ‘crash trolley’. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to notify the RMO on duty of patients requiring notification

Wider context from the report

“3. It transpired that this patient was NEVER notified to the RMO on duty as should be the case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to catheterise patients receiving intravenous fluids when required

Wider context from the report

“6. Despite the fact that this patient was receiving (apparently) i.v. fluids, at no time was a fluid balance chart commenced nor was the patient catheterised. The Ward manager agreed that both of these failings were unacceptable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in acting on identified requirements for platelet and Hb support

Wider context from the report

“7. It was acknowledged early in the patient’s passage through the hospital that she would need platelets and Hb support, yet it took over four and a half hours for anything to be done about this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately assess and manage a non-running saline infusion

Wider context from the report

“5. When the husband of the deceased drew to the attention of the staff that the saline infusion appeared not to be ‘running’ so he was told by the nurse to “hold her arm straight” to enable it to do so. He and I, and the Ward manager, felt that this was entirely inappropriate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe intravenous fluid management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to commence fluid balance charts for patients receiving intravenous fluids

Wider context from the report

“6. Despite the fact that this patient was receiving (apparently) i.v. fluids, at no time was a fluid balance chart commenced nor was the patient catheterised. The Ward manager agreed that both of these failings were unacceptable. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor patient fluid balance; Unreliable recording of fluid balance information.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.