Thomas Pickering · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Aug 2021•Suffolk

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of signage warning of hidden dips at the site
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
  2. Lack of signage notifying road users of recent incidents at the area
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Suffolk County Council

    Design suitable locations for a pair of hidden-dip signs north of Wallers Farm access.

  2. Suffolk County Council

    Erect new posts and a pair of hidden-dip signs facing southbound traffic north of Wallers Farm access.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. National Highways

    Suffolk County Council is responsible for responding to the safety concerns.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. National Highways

    The A137 is outside responsibility, so the safety concerns cannot be commented on.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signage warning of hidden dips at the site

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned as to whether further preventative steps can be taken to mitigate the risk of future RTC’s at the site given the apparent lack of signage – eg hidden dips, or signage relating to notification of recent incidents at the area to increase awareness eg the number of fatalities/collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signage notifying road users of recent incidents at the area

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned as to whether further preventative steps can be taken to mitigate the risk of future RTC’s at the site given the apparent lack of signage – eg hidden dips, or signage relating to notification of recent incidents at the area to increase awareness eg the number of fatalities/collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design suitable locations for a pair of hidden-dip signs north of Wallers Farm access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For your information SCC Highways has assessed the Report and agreed to install a pair of hidden dip signs north of the Wallers Farm access, facing southbound traffic.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-Suffolk-County-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Erect new posts and a pair of hidden-dip signs facing southbound traffic north of Wallers Farm access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For your information SCC Highways has assessed the Report and agreed to install a pair of hidden dip signs north of the Wallers Farm access, facing southbound traffic.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-Suffolk-County-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suffolk County Council is responsible for responding to the safety concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Highways is responsible for the motorways and trunk roads in England and the A137 isn't a road we're responsible for so we can't comment on this matter. I see you sent this to Suffolk County Council as well so they'll have to respond to this.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-National-Highways_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The A137 is outside responsibility, so the safety concerns cannot be commented on.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Highways is responsible for the motorways and trunk roads in England and the A137 isn't a road we're responsible for so we can't comment on this matter. I see you sent this to Suffolk County Council as well so they'll have to respond to this.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-National-Highways_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026