PFD report

Thomas Pickering · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Aug 2021•Suffolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of signage warning of hidden dips at the site
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
  2. Lack of signage notifying road users of recent incidents at the area
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Design suitable locations for a pair of hidden-dip signs north of Wallers Farm access.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 September 2021.
  2. Action

    Erect new posts and a pair of hidden-dip signs facing southbound traffic north of Wallers Farm access.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Suffolk County Council is responsible for responding to the safety concerns.

    Stated by National HighwaysRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signage warning of hidden dips at the site

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned as to whether further preventative steps can be taken to mitigate the risk of future RTC’s at the site given the apparent lack of signage – eg hidden dips, or signage relating to notification of recent incidents at the area to increase awareness eg the number of fatalities/collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signage notifying road users of recent incidents at the area

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned as to whether further preventative steps can be taken to mitigate the risk of future RTC’s at the site given the apparent lack of signage – eg hidden dips, or signage relating to notification of recent incidents at the area to increase awareness eg the number of fatalities/collisions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design suitable locations for a pair of hidden-dip signs north of Wallers Farm access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For your information SCC Highways has assessed the Report and agreed to install a pair of hidden dip signs north of the Wallers Farm access, facing southbound traffic.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-Suffolk-County-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Erect new posts and a pair of hidden-dip signs facing southbound traffic north of Wallers Farm access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For your information SCC Highways has assessed the Report and agreed to install a pair of hidden dip signs north of the Wallers Farm access, facing southbound traffic.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-Suffolk-County-Council_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Suffolk County Council is responsible for responding to the safety concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Highways is responsible for the motorways and trunk roads in England and the A137 isn't a road we're responsible for so we can't comment on this matter. I see you sent this to Suffolk County Council as well so they'll have to respond to this.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-National-Highways_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The A137 is outside responsibility, so the safety concerns cannot be commented on.

Verbatim wording from the response

“National Highways is responsible for the motorways and trunk roads in England and the A137 isn't a road we're responsible for so we can't comment on this matter. I see you sent this to Suffolk County Council as well so they'll have to respond to this.”

Source location

2021-0289-Response-from-National-Highways_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026