PFD report

Parv Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Sep 2015•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. PEWS scores distracting doctors from serious illness despite low scores
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable paediatric early warning score (PEWS) systems
  2. PEWS scores not reflecting current research into child illness
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable paediatric early warning score (PEWS) systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A single nationally recommended PEWS score cannot yet be established because children’s differing needs make development complex and research is ongoing.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

PEWS scores distracting doctors from serious illness despite low scores

Wider context from the report

“That PEWS scores do not reflect current research into child illness. And that the Pews scores may tend to act to distract the doctors away from the fact that despite a low PEWS score a child might be seriously ill ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable paediatric early warning score (PEWS) systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

PEWS scores not reflecting current research into child illness

Wider context from the report

“That PEWS scores do not reflect current research into child illness. And that the Pews scores may tend to act to distract the doctors away from the fact that despite a low PEWS score a child might be seriously ill ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable paediatric early warning score (PEWS) systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A single nationally recommended PEWS score cannot yet be established because children’s differing needs make development complex and research is ongoing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England are continuing to work towards developing a consensus view on a paediatric early warning system. There is at present no nationally recommended PEWS score. The complexities of developing a single score are a challenge. It would have to reflect the differing needs and requirements of all children from infants to teenagers, with a range of greatly different underlying healthcare conditions. Developing such a score is the subject of current research funded by the National Institute for Health Research.”

Source location

2015-0457-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 29 September 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026