PFD report

Tyler Jay Ryan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Oct 2023•Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to identify the need for genetic testing before the Pathology report
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable pathology report tracking and follow-up
  2. Chronic shortage of Paediatric Pathologists
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient pathology capacity for timely sample analysis and reporting
  3. Limited use of molecular autopsy after sudden death in childhood
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable detection and reporting of clinically significant genetic variants
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Streamline registration processes through programmes currently underway.

    Stated by General Medical CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. Action

    Develop and implement new pathways to the specialist register for suitably qualified doctors without UK-approved training.

    Stated by General Medical CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  3. Action

    Make registration pathways more flexible and accessible for doctors meeting required standards to join or remain in the UK medical workforce.

    Stated by General Medical CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    UK governments and NHS bodies set the number of doctors trained in each specialty or subspecialty, not the regulator.

    Stated by General Medical CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify the need for genetic testing before the Pathology report

Wider context from the report

“2. The delay in Paediatric Pathology Reports results in the delayed detection of the need for genetic testing amongst surviving siblings of children who die of Sudden Death in Childhood. Currently, it is not until the Pathologist provides a report that the need for genetic testing is identified. Reports can take up to two years to be filed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pathology report tracking and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Chronic shortage of Paediatric Pathologists

Wider context from the report

“1. ████████ and ████████ each gave evidence that the delay in Paediatric Pathology reports is due to a chronic shortage in recruitment and retention of Paediatric Pathologists in the UK. This shortage is systemic. Currently only 50 out of 80 national vacancies for Paediatric Pathologists are filled. Coronial and Forensic work is undertaken by these Pathologists on a private basis, in addition to their NHS work. This provides insufficient time to carry out this work in a timely fashion. There is an acute shortage of Subspeciality Paediatric Pathologists, with just one Paediatric Orthopedic Pathologist undertaking Forensic and Coronial work in the UK. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient pathology capacity for timely sample analysis and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited use of molecular autopsy after sudden death in childhood

Wider context from the report

“3. ████████ and ████████ gave evidence that more widespread use of molecular autopsy would assist in detecting genetic abnormalities in children who have died suddenly, leading to greater opportunities to prevent future deaths within their families and in other families. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable detection and reporting of clinically significant genetic variants.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the SUDIC Protocol to reflect the development of molecular autopsy

Wider context from the report

“5. ████████ gave evidence that the development of the use of molecular autopsy calls for a revision of the SUDIC Protocol also known as the Kennedy Protocol. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coronial autopsy governance and processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited use of molecular autopsy to detect familial genetic variants

Wider context from the report

“4. ████████, Consultant Clinical Geneticist gave evidence that Tyler is, to date, the only human in history to have been found to have these two RYR2 variants which is significant to his family and to the wider scientific community. Greater use of molecular autopsy would save lives within families and in other families. The detection of these variants is directly relevant to others and the prevention of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable detection and reporting of clinically significant genetic variants.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient time for timely Coronial and Forensic Paediatric Pathology work

Wider context from the report

“1. ████████ and ████████ each gave evidence that the delay in Paediatric Pathology reports is due to a chronic shortage in recruitment and retention of Paediatric Pathologists in the UK. This shortage is systemic. Currently only 50 out of 80 national vacancies for Paediatric Pathologists are filled. Coronial and Forensic work is undertaken by these Pathologists on a private basis, in addition to their NHS work. This provides insufficient time to carry out this work in a timely fashion. There is an acute shortage of Subspeciality Paediatric Pathologists, with just one Paediatric Orthopedic Pathologist undertaking Forensic and Coronial work in the UK. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient pathology capacity for timely sample analysis and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in Paediatric Pathology reports

Wider context from the report

“2. The delay in Paediatric Pathology Reports results in the delayed detection of the need for genetic testing amongst surviving siblings of children who die of Sudden Death in Childhood. Currently, it is not until the Pathologist provides a report that the need for genetic testing is identified. Reports can take up to two years to be filed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pathology report tracking and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Streamline registration processes through programmes currently underway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Beyond that, we also have number of programmes underway aimed at streamlining our registration processes. I recognise that none of this amounts to assurance about specific vacancies being filled. But I hope it shows our ongoing commitment to providing effective channels into the UK medical workforce.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and implement new pathways to the specialist register for suitably qualified doctors without UK-approved training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Particularly relevant here, perhaps, is the work we’re doing to make specialist registration more accessible to those who are suitably qualified, but who have not completed an approved training course in the UK. We have long sought, and have now obtained, a change to our legislation to make it less prescriptive about the evidence requirements to support an application for specialist”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make registration pathways more flexible and accessible for doctors meeting required standards to join or remain in the UK medical workforce.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, we do have responsibility for the registration processes through which suitably qualified doctors obtain the legal right to practise in the UK, or (in the case of specialist registration) demonstrate that they have completed specialist training across all recognised specialties. How effective we are at managing those processes clearly does have a direct bearing on how readily the UK workforce can attract and absorb the doctors required to meet ever-increasing and more complex service needs. We’re committed, as a matter of priority, to making our registration pathways as flexible and accessible as we can for all those doctors who meet the required standards to join and remain in the UK medical workforce.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand facilities and staffing to provide increased capacity for both parts of the PLAB test.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In recent years we’ve invested in additional facilities and people to offer a record number of places in both parts of the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB) test, which is the means by which many international medical graduates can demonstrate their knowledge and skills for registration purposes. In 2022 over 14,000 doctors sat PLAB 1 and over 13,500 doctors sat PLAB 2, which were significant increases compared to previous years. The number of places this year is around 23,000 for PLAB 1 and 16,000 places for PLAB 2 respectively.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain and apply less prescriptive legislation governing evidence requirements for specialist registration applications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Particularly relevant here, perhaps, is the work we’re doing to make specialist registration more accessible to those who are suitably qualified, but who have not completed an approved training course in the UK. We have long sought, and have now obtained, a change to our legislation to make it less prescriptive about the evidence requirements to support an application for specialist”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise revision of the Sudden Unexpected Death in Children protocol with the Royal Colleges and relevant government departments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In your Report you also reference the Kennedy Guidance and the need for a revision of the Sudden Unexpected Death In Children (SUDIC) protocol. The guidance was published in November 2016 and was developed by the RCPath in collaboration with the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). NHS England will be raising the issue of the revision with the Royal Colleges and the relevant government departments.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement recruitment incentives to attract pathologists into higher specialist training in paediatric and perinatal pathology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In your Report you raise a concern over the shortage of Paediatric Pathologists and the delays that this can cause to Paediatric Pathology reports. The shortage of paediatric and perinatal pathologists and the impact it has on services has been of concern for some time. This issue has been the subject of a great deal of activity relating to attracting pathologists into higher specialist training in this area with the implementation of recruitment incentives (one-off payments of £20,000) as well as supporting learning via e-learning resources.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support learning through e-learning resources for paediatric and perinatal pathology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In your Report you raise a concern over the shortage of Paediatric Pathologists and the delays that this can cause to Paediatric Pathology reports. The shortage of paediatric and perinatal pathologists and the impact it has on services has been of concern for some time. This issue has been the subject of a great deal of activity relating to attracting pathologists into higher specialist training in this area with the implementation of recruitment incentives (one-off payments of £20,000) as well as supporting learning via e-learning resources.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

UK governments and NHS bodies set the number of doctors trained in each specialty or subspecialty, not the regulator.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The GMC, as the statutory regulator for the medical profession, does not have a direct role in the recruitment or retention of doctors across any specialty in the UK. This is exclusively a matter for the NHS in each of the four UK countries. Similarly, although we have responsibility for the oversight of postgraduate medical training, we have no role in determining how many doctors are trained in any specialty or subspecialty. These numbers are set by each of the UK governments in conjunction with the NHS in each of the countries. We’re not therefore in a position to take specific action to secure numbers of doctor in this speciality, or in any others.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruitment and retention of doctors are exclusively matters for the NHS in each UK country, outside the regulator’s direct role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The GMC, as the statutory regulator for the medical profession, does not have a direct role in the recruitment or retention of doctors across any specialty in the UK. This is exclusively a matter for the NHS in each of the four UK countries. Similarly, although we have responsibility for the oversight of postgraduate medical training, we have no role in determining how many doctors are trained in any specialty or subspecialty. These numbers are set by each of the UK governments in conjunction with the NHS in each of the countries. We’re not therefore in a position to take specific action to secure numbers of doctor in this speciality, or in any others.”

Source location

Response from General Medical Council
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

RCPath is the appropriate organisation to comment on concerns about molecular autopsy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“RCPath and they would be the appropriate organisation to provide comment on your concerns touching on molecular autopsy.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Develop a placental pathology reporting curriculum for biomedical scientist advanced practice with professional and internal stakeholders.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 October 2023.
  2. 2

    Operate the Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share learning nationally and regionally across the NHS.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 October 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing genomic testing policies and processes are considered sufficient to ensure testing remains available where clinically beneficial.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a placental pathology reporting curriculum for biomedical scientist advanced practice with professional and internal stakeholders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is also ongoing with NHS England’s Children and Young People’s Team, the Pathology Team and the Workforce Training and Education Directorate, as well as professional bodies such as the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) and the Institute of Biomedical Science (IBMS) to develop a curriculum for placental pathology reporting for biomedical scientist advance practice to supplement the stretched workforce. There isn’t a timeline for this at the moment but we are happy to update the coroner once further progress has been made.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Regulation 28 Working Group to discuss reports and share learning nationally and regionally across the NHS.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing genomic testing policies and processes are considered sufficient to ensure testing remains available where clinically beneficial.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England has undertaken a formal assessment and continues to review evidence for the potential merits of using genetic testing for certain heart conditions and heart disease through the National Genomic Test Directory. A robust and evidence-based process and policy is in place to ensure that genomic testing continues to be available for all patients for whom it would be of clinical benefit.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 30 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026