PFD report

Ethan Jake Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jul 2022•Suffolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Severely restricted visibility for cyclists and pedestrians approaching Higher Drive
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate visibility for road users at hazardous junctions
  2. Failure to slow cyclists and fast-moving pedestrians before entering Higher Drive
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Paint a white stop line on the tarmac east of the existing concrete bollards.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 September 2022.
  2. Action

    Install an illuminated STOP sign on the existing post at the public bridleway entrance.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 September 2022.
  3. Action

    Paint STOP on the tarmac west of the existing concrete bollards.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 September 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A physical barrier cannot be installed because space is insufficient and underground high-voltage cables and other services constrain the bridleway.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Severely restricted visibility for cyclists and pedestrians approaching Higher Drive

Wider context from the report

“In evidence it was heard that the public bridleway, Woods Lake West, is predominantly used by pedestrians and cyclists. As part of the police investigation, photographs were provided that showed the area where Woods Lake West joins Higher Drive. Woods Lake West joins Higher Drive at approximately a 90-degree angle and vehicle access to the Lake is prevented by two concrete bollards. These bollards are placed wide enough apart as not to cause a hinderance to either cyclists or pedestrians. When cycling from Woods Lake West onto Higher Drive, the view afforded of Higher Drive is severely restricted by fencing, and it is only once a cyclist or pedestrian is on the pavement of Higher Drive itself, are they afforded any view of the main road to their right. This is the direction of travel of the van with which Ethan collided. The police officer who investigated Ethan's tragic death, stated in evidence that there was no physical barrier, or any other measure in place, that would make a cyclist or fast-moving pedestrian slow down before entering Higher Drive. The police officer was particularly concerned about children using the Lake as a cycle path, as these young riders have a much lower perception of risk. The officer was of the opinion that some physical means of preventing direct access onto Higher Drive from Woods Lake West, or some other measure to ensure a cyclist or fast-moving pedestrian slowed down on approaching Higher Drive, would prevent a further tragedy at this location. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate visibility for road users at hazardous junctions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to slow cyclists and fast-moving pedestrians before entering Higher Drive

Wider context from the report

“In evidence it was heard that the public bridleway, Woods Lake West, is predominantly used by pedestrians and cyclists. As part of the police investigation, photographs were provided that showed the area where Woods Lake West joins Higher Drive. Woods Lake West joins Higher Drive at approximately a 90-degree angle and vehicle access to the Lake is prevented by two concrete bollards. These bollards are placed wide enough apart as not to cause a hinderance to either cyclists or pedestrians. When cycling from Woods Lake West onto Higher Drive, the view afforded of Higher Drive is severely restricted by fencing, and it is only once a cyclist or pedestrian is on the pavement of Higher Drive itself, are they afforded any view of the main road to their right. This is the direction of travel of the van with which Ethan collided. The police officer who investigated Ethan's tragic death, stated in evidence that there was no physical barrier, or any other measure in place, that would make a cyclist or fast-moving pedestrian slow down before entering Higher Drive. The police officer was particularly concerned about children using the Lake as a cycle path, as these young riders have a much lower perception of risk. The officer was of the opinion that some physical means of preventing direct access onto Higher Drive from Woods Lake West, or some other measure to ensure a cyclist or fast-moving pedestrian slowed down on approaching Higher Drive, would prevent a further tragedy at this location. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paint a white stop line on the tarmac east of the existing concrete bollards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Paint a white stop line on the surface of the tarmac on the east side of the existing concrete bollards”

Source location

Response from Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 28 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install an illuminated STOP sign on the existing post at the public bridleway entrance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Install an illuminated ‘STOP’ sign onto the existing post at the end of the public bridleway”

Source location

Response from Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 28 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paint STOP on the tarmac west of the existing concrete bollards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Paint the word STOP on the surface of the tarmac on the west side of the existing concrete bollards”

Source location

Response from Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 28 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A physical barrier cannot be installed because space is insufficient and underground high-voltage cables and other services constrain the bridleway.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council also considered the installation of a physical barrier and concluded that it would not be possible, as there is not enough space to facilitate a staggered barrier system that would allow all users such as those with mobility scooters and cyclists with pull-alongs. The width is also constrained by the presence of an underground high voltage cable and other services within and at the edge of the bridleway.”

Source location

Response from Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 28 September 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Paint the existing concrete bollards yellow and black.

    Stated by Suffolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 September 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paint the existing concrete bollards yellow and black.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Paint the existing concrete bollards with yellow and black paint”

Source location

Response from Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 28 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026