PFD report

Enric Albert Alejandro Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Aug 2018•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Gestational barriers to referral of young women who book late to the Family Nurse Partnership
  2. Failure to recognise late booking as a positive referral reason for vulnerable mothers and babies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Consider, case by case, accepting willing referrals after 28 weeks’ gestation where additional vulnerabilities or concealed pregnancy are present.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 January 2019.
  2. Action

    Meet with commissioners and the national FNP Team to agree further local flexibility in programme delivery.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 January 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The FNP’s existing 28-week recruitment threshold remains appropriate because therapeutic relationships require time to form, subject to limited case-by-case referrals and testing.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Gestational barriers to referral of young women who book late to the Family Nurse Partnership

Wider context from the report

“1. That young women who book later than 28 weeks can only be considered for referral to the Family Nurse Partnership, despite the fact that late booking is often a further risk factor indicating increased vulnerability to the mother and young child. 2. That late bookers may still be debarred from referral on the basis of gestation. 3. That such vulnerable mothers are thus excluded from the support offered by the Family Nurse Partnership and thus their child be at increased risk of death in infancy. 4. That the increased risk to mothers and babies of late booking does not appear to be recognised as a positive reason supporting referral to the Family Nurse partnership. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise late booking as a positive referral reason for vulnerable mothers and babies

Wider context from the report

“1. That young women who book later than 28 weeks can only be considered for referral to the Family Nurse Partnership, despite the fact that late booking is often a further risk factor indicating increased vulnerability to the mother and young child. 2. That late bookers may still be debarred from referral on the basis of gestation. 3. That such vulnerable mothers are thus excluded from the support offered by the Family Nurse Partnership and thus their child be at increased risk of death in infancy. 4. That the increased risk to mothers and babies of late booking does not appear to be recognised as a positive reason supporting referral to the Family Nurse partnership. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider, case by case, accepting willing referrals after 28 weeks’ gestation where additional vulnerabilities or concealed pregnancy are present.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of your PFD, we have agreed that we can consider with the London FNP team, on a case by case basis, accepting referrals for mothers who are willing to engage with the FNP programme when they are referred after 28 weeks gestation, particularly when there are a further range of needs, vulnerabilities and issues associated with concealed pregnancy.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with commissioners and the national FNP Team to agree further local flexibility in programme delivery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following your PFD, our Trust FNP lead has met with both our local commissioners and the national FNP Team to agree how we can further implement local flexibility to the delivery of the FNP programme.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The FNP’s existing 28-week recruitment threshold remains appropriate because therapeutic relationships require time to form, subject to limited case-by-case referrals and testing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of your PFD, we have agreed that we can consider with the London FNP team, on a case by case basis, accepting referrals for mothers who are willing to engage with the FNP programme when they are referred after 28 weeks gestation, particularly when there are a further range of needs, vulnerabilities and issues associated with concealed pregnancy.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Continue working with the national FNP Team to test outcomes for referrals made after 28 weeks’ gestation and contribute to the programme evidence base.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 January 2019.
  2. 2

    Expand local FNP eligibility to accept mothers aged up to 25 years.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 January 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Enhanced Health Visiting services are considered an adequate alternative for vulnerable mothers unable or unwilling to join the FNP programme.

    Stated by Whittington Health NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with the national FNP Team to test outcomes for referrals made after 28 weeks’ gestation and contribute to the programme evidence base.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We, as a local provider of the FNP programme, will continue to work with the national FNP team to test the impact on programme outcomes for any referrals that happen over 28 weeks gestation, and we will work with the national team to add to the considerable evidence base of the national FNP programme.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand local FNP eligibility to accept mothers aged up to 25 years.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In agreement with the national team, we have made a change to our referral criteria so that mothers up to the age of 25 years old are now accepted into the local programme.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enhanced Health Visiting services are considered an adequate alternative for vulnerable mothers unable or unwilling to join the FNP programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When a mother is not able or willing to join the FNP programme, the Trust’s Health Visiting service will undertake a full assessment of need based on the Healthy Child Programme, and will ensure that our enhanced Health Visiting programmes – Universal Plus and Universal Partnership Plus – are actively offered to families with additional needs and vulnerabilities. These enhanced service offers, whilst not part of the FNP programme, do provide an opportunity to work collaboratively with young and vulnerable mothers and their children delivering similar evidenced based interventions to those offered through the FNP programme.”

Source location

2018-0300-Response-by-Whittington-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 January 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026