PFD report

Ms. Amy Jo Cross · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Oct 2025•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a system for passing important healthcare information between criminal justice healthcare providers during conveyance
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable custody handoversPart of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
  2. Lack of a standard medical records system accessible to each healthcare organisation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Continue discussions with PECS to commence pilots enabling Liaison and Diversion services to access and update the Digital Person Escort Record.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system for passing important healthcare information between criminal justice healthcare providers during conveyance

Wider context from the report

“(1) There is no system to ensure that important healthcare information including recent administration of medicines and the results of physical observations is passed between separate providers of healthcare in the criminal justice system at the time a person is conveyed between the police, the court and the prison. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable custody handovers; Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a standard medical records system accessible to each healthcare organisation

Wider context from the report

“(2) There is no standard medical records system which can be accessed by each healthcare organisation to ensure the efficient and effective transfer of medical information. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue discussions with PECS to commence pilots enabling Liaison and Diversion services to access and update the Digital Person Escort Record.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England does commission Liaison & Diversion services, which also operate with police custody suites, addressing mental health and wider vulnerabilities. There is no indication that a referral was made in this case to Liaison & Diversion services at either Torquay or Exeter police custody suites. Liaison & Diversion services do not currently have access to enter information directly onto the DPER, but with an individual’s consent, they will share relevant health information with the police and the police will be responsible for updating the DPER. NHS England is in discussion with PECS to commence pilot schemes in London and West Yorkshire, whereby PECS will issue licences to Liaison & Diversion Services, to enable them to directly access the DPER and enter health information. The pilots are expected to commence in 2026 at the following sites:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Table the case findings, information and learning at a future Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group meeting.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2025.
  2. 2

    Engage with the South West region regarding the concerns raised in the report.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 October 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Commissioning police custody healthcare services falls outside NHS England’s responsibility.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. 2

    Police and Crime Commissioners are responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Table the case findings, information and learning at a future Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The findings, information and any learning from this case will be tabled at a future NHS England Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group (HJDOG). The HJDOG is the senior leadership forum, which holds responsibility for the oversight of delivery and continuous improvement in Health and Justice commissioned services, through both national and regional teams. All health and justice related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths are shared and discussed at the HJDOG, and assurance is sought from regions where learning and action is identified.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with the South West region regarding the concerns raised in the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s national health and justice team has also engaged with colleagues from the South West region on the concerns raised in your report.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commissioning police custody healthcare services falls outside NHS England’s responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England is not responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services; this function sits with Police & Crime Commissioners. The Police & Crime Commissioner for Devon & Cornwall Constabulary is responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services at the Torquay and Exeter police stations. The police are responsible for detailing relevant health information on the individual’s DPER within police custody suite settings, usually having taken advice from the police custody healthcare provider.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police and Crime Commissioners are responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England is not responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services; this function sits with Police & Crime Commissioners. The Police & Crime Commissioner for Devon & Cornwall Constabulary is responsible for commissioning police custody healthcare services at the Torquay and Exeter police stations. The police are responsible for detailing relevant health information on the individual’s DPER within police custody suite settings, usually having taken advice from the police custody healthcare provider.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 23 October 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026