PFD report

Mrs Jean James · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Mar 2014•Sunderland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Insufficient robustness of systems and compliance controls to deal with human factors
  2. Delays in completing initial documentation due to process interruptions
  3. Failure to communicate pharmacy queries effectively
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication between pharmacies and clinical teams
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Review the VTE policy to incorporate technical changes to the VTE assessment and prescribing process.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 March 2014.
  2. Action

    Alert clinical teams about the VTE assessment and prescribing system changes through an all-users electronic message and team briefings.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 March 2014.
  3. Action

    Review pharmacy-team communication and escalation of medication omissions to identify workable solutions.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 13 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient robustness of systems and compliance controls to deal with human factors

Wider context from the report

“4) Systems, forms, checklists, policies, procedures and protocols and compliance with them may not be sufficiently robust to deal with human factors. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing initial documentation due to process interruptions

Wider context from the report

“1) The time taken to complete the initial documentation was longer than it ought to have been given the interruptions to the process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate pharmacy queries effectively

Wider context from the report

“3) When the pharmacy raised a query, it was not communicated effectively. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication between pharmacies and clinical teams.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to effectively review omissions to prescribe prophylactic Dalteparin

Wider context from the report

“2) The omission to prescribe prophylactic Dalteparin had not been subject to any effective review by a clinician or a nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently timely implementation of effective change initiatives

Wider context from the report

“The failures revealed without correction from 24 December until Mrs James’ acute deterioration and death on 8 January 2014. I heard evidence about the number of initiatives that were under way, including increased vigilance. However, I remain concerned that such steps may be insufficient to effect change in a more timely way. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to correct revealed safety failures in a timely way

Wider context from the report

“The failures revealed without correction from 24 December until Mrs James’ acute deterioration and death on 8 January 2014. I heard evidence about the number of initiatives that were under way, including increased vigilance. However, I remain concerned that such steps may be insufficient to effect change in a more timely way. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the VTE policy to incorporate technical changes to the VTE assessment and prescribing process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4) The Trust has a VTE policy based on NICE guidelines and we are currently reviewing the policy to encompass the technical changes made to the VTE assessment and prescribing process. We will hold a Trust wide clinical symposium in the autumn to ensure staff have the opportunity to discuss current issues regarding the management of patients at risk of VTE.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Alert clinical teams about the VTE assessment and prescribing system changes through an all-users electronic message and team briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The clinical teams will be alerted to this development by:”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review pharmacy-team communication and escalation of medication omissions to identify workable solutions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3) Communication between the pharmacy team and escalation of omissions is currently the subject of an internal review where the team are in the process of identifying workable solutions.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Test and implement automated VTE risk prompts, mandatory thromboprophylaxis prescribing or rationale documentation, and medication administration alerts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1) We have reviewed the hospital information system, known as MEDITECH V6 to find a solution to prevent further risk for patients who on assessment are at risk of developing a venous thromboembolism episode (VTE). The proposal is for the VTE assessment screen to automatically move to the prescription screen if a patient has been identified as being at risk.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 1 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct an audit of the VTE system to ensure practice is embedded.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have also directed our Clinical Governance Department to undertake an audit of the system to ensure practice is embedded.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Use a patient-focused acuity handover tool for transfers from the Acute Medical Unit to base wards.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 March 2014.
  2. 2

    Hold a Trust-wide clinical symposium to discuss management of patients at risk of VTE.

    Stated by South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a patient-focused acuity handover tool for transfers from the Acute Medical Unit to base wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2) We have introduced a new format for clinical handover of patients from the Acute Medical Unit to their base ward. This acuity handover tool is patient focused and highlights key indicators regarding the patient's healthcare needs, and treatment plan.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a Trust-wide clinical symposium to discuss management of patients at risk of VTE.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4) The Trust has a VTE policy based on NICE guidelines and we are currently reviewing the policy to encompass the technical changes made to the VTE assessment and prescribing process. We will hold a Trust wide clinical symposium in the autumn to ensure staff have the opportunity to discuss current issues regarding the management of patients at risk of VTE.”

Source location

2014-0112-Response-by-City-Hospitals-Sunderland
Page 2 · response
Published 13 March 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026