PFD report

Matthew Bilby · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Mar 2019•Lincolnshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Dangerous and confusing layout of the A16/B1166 junction
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctionsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe road design and layout
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Continue monitoring funding opportunities for constructing the proposed roundabout.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 June 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Lack of available funding prevents delivery of the proposed roundabout and makes further road safety improvements difficult.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dangerous and confusing layout of the A16/B1166 junction

Wider context from the report

“1. The court heard evidence from a number of current regular road users describing the layout of the A16/B1166 junction as "dangerous", "horrendous", "confusing" and "difficult"; 2. In evidence the Lincolnshire Police confirmed that this was the fourth fatality at this junction; 3. The junction was created as a "staggered" junction in August 2010. Following one of the previous fatalities at the junction further work had been undertaken with red thermoplastic laid in hatched areas; 4. Expert evidence received from the East Midlands Operational Support Service Serious Collision Investigation Unit confirmed the junction to be an "accident blackspot" and that the staggered junction created an on-going risk to future road users in that: a. This junction should be reconfigured as a roundabout; b. Alternatively there should be the deployment of considered traffic calming measures (cameras, traffic lights, speed restrictions). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions; Unsafe road design and layout.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring funding opportunities for constructing the proposed roundabout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. We would continue to monitor funding opportunities for the roundabout and”

Source location

2019-0112-Response-by-Lincolnshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of available funding prevents delivery of the proposed roundabout and makes further road safety improvements difficult.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have noted the comments made by the Secretary of State, specifically that 'the responsibility for traffic management on local roads rests with the relevant local highway authority.' However, as set out in the Council's response dated 11 June 2019 to the Regulation 28 Report, there is currently no funding available for the Council to proceed with a project to construct a four-arm roundabout at this location.”

Source location

2019-0112-Response-by-Lincolnshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local highway authorities, not the Department, are responsible for deciding and implementing site-specific traffic management measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The responsibility for traffic management on local roads rests with the relevant local highway authority, as they are best placed to consider how to use traffic management measures so that local needs can be effectively met. My Department’s role is to provide the overarching strategy and policy context, as well as guidance to help them in managing their roads.”

Source location

2019-0112-Response-by-Department-for-Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Assess the impact of traffic-calming measures on collision rates.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 June 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the impact of traffic-calming measures on collision rates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We are currently assessing the impact the traffic calming measures have had on collision rates.”

Source location

2019-0112-Response-by-Lincolnshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026