PFD report

Ashley Crews · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Apr 2024•Manchester City

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a local policy for handcuff use when executing arrest warrants
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a local policy for handcuff use when executing arrest warrants

Wider context from the report

“1. There is no local policy for the use of handcuffs when executing an arrest warrant. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Specific guidance or policy on handcuff use during search warrants is considered impractical because policing scenarios are wide-ranging.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Specific guidance or policy on handcuff use during search warrants is considered impractical because policing scenarios are wide-ranging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The policing scenarios are so wide ranging that it is impractical to offer specific instruction or policy on when handcuffs should be applied to restrain individuals whilst under arrest or detained under the powers of a search warrant. In pre-planning for the execution of search warrants, we consider the vulnerability of the known occupants including factors such as age, mental health or physical issues. That would not necessarily influence an individual decision to use force and handcuff somebody during such an operation.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 1 · response
Published 30 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026