PFD report

Toni Elizabeth SKILLINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 31 Jul 2014•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure of MPDS to ask whether an overdose patient is alone
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable Medical Priority Dispatch System emergency assessment and advice pathwaysPart of recurring concern: Unsafe management of ambulance calls involving callers who are alone
  2. Failure to include methadone among MPDS drug choices following an overdose
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable Medical Priority Dispatch System emergency assessment and advice pathways
  3. Failure to take appropriate action after unanswered welfare-check callbacks
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate welfare concerns after unsuccessful contactPart of recurring concern: Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breachedPart of recurring concern: Unreliable welfare-check request handling and follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of MPDS to ask whether an overdose patient is alone

Wider context from the report

“2. The MPDS does not ask specifically whether the patient is alone, though it is recognised that this renders a patient particularly vulnerable. I understand that the LAS has also written to the National Academy for Emergency Medical Dispatch about this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Medical Priority Dispatch System emergency assessment and advice pathways; Unsafe management of ambulance calls involving callers who are alone.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include methadone among MPDS drug choices following an overdose

Wider context from the report

“1. The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) does not include methadone as a one of the drug choices following an overdose, despite the fact that it is commonly taken in excess. I understand that the LAS has written to the National Academy for Emergency Medical Dispatch about this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Medical Priority Dispatch System emergency assessment and advice pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take appropriate action after unanswered welfare-check callbacks

Wider context from the report

“3. Two welfare checks were made via ring backs without any reply gained, yet neither of these was followed by the appropriate action. Even accepting how busy and under staffed the service was that night, a call child at least have been made to the police asking for attendance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate welfare concerns after unsuccessful contact; Failure to take timely escalation action when safety thresholds are breached; Unreliable welfare-check request handling and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in paramedic response to intentional methadone overdose calls

Wider context from the report

“4. London Ambulance Service received a call describing an intentional methadone overdose, teath with alcohol, and yet no paramedic responded until three hours later. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.