PFD report

William Albert Nairn Lardner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Dec 2024•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of a stable safe public footpath along Hurn Court Lane
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads
  2. Limited public transport access to the airport
  3. Lack of pedestrian pathway and crossing facility at Parley Lane Parking
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roadsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Consult on reducing the Parley Lane speed limit from 60 to 40 mph.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Assess the location for a vehicle-activated sign after the speed limit is reduced to 40 mph.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 December 2024.
  3. Action

    Re-check the operation of pedestrian crossing facilities at the Hurn Court Lane and Parley Lane junction.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 December 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Provision of a footway beyond the speed-limit signs is outside the council’s highway responsibility.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a stable safe public footpath along Hurn Court Lane

Wider context from the report

“(5) Parley Lane is a busy single carriageway semi-rural road with a national speed limit and BCP Council has responsibility for the road as the local highway authority. Hurn Court Lane is owned by the airport who therefore have responsibility for it. There is no public footpath along Hurn Court Lane after turning off Parley Lane to access the airport. Please see attached photograph at JGL/4. This results in pedestrians walking in the road or on the grass section next to the road on Hurn Court Lane to get to the airport terminal. This is dangerous as it is not a stable, safe public pathway and could lead to people falling into the road or being struck by vehicles, especially as people pull suitcases along. The airport has erected signs stating these is no pedestrian access, however, these are widely ignored. (6) A site visit and assessment in July 2023 by Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer and the Senior BCP Council Safety Officer following Billy’s death highlighted some fundamental safety issues. At this time no action has been taken around these safety issues, although matters have been discussed. Accordingly, the safety issues remain the same 17 months on from the site assessment, with a likely increasing number of passengers using the airport going forward. (7) I, therefore, have concerns that there could be future deaths given the manner in which users are accessing the airport and the lack of public transport and pedestrian access available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited public transport access to the airport

Wider context from the report

“(3) There is limited access to the airport by public transport. There is no access by train and there is one bus service from central Bournemouth to the airport. This bus service only operates Monday to Friday with a total of 5 journeys a day: 2 inbound journeys which are from Westover Road, Bournemouth to the Airport, one between 05.50 and 06.31 hours and then the other between 06.35 to 07.22 hours and 3 outbound journeys from Bournemouth Airport to Westover Road, Bournemouth between 13.53 to 14.25 hours, 16.20 and 17.20 hours and 18.00 to 18.49 hours. This service focuses on providing a service for staff working at the neighbouring Aviation Business Park, however, does also serve the main passenger terminal. Previously, the airport was served by an hourly bus service, however this was stopped. (4) Many people access the airport on foot, either being dropped off and/or picked up on Parley Lane where there is no layby or drop off zone or by using nearby car parks and walking on foot to the airport. One such car park is at the Adventure Wonderland site and is known as Parley Lane Parking (Parley Lane Parking | Bournemouth Airport Parking). This is 0.9 miles from the airport, on the opposite side of Parley Lane which offers cheaper rates than Bournemouth Airport to park. There is no pathway on the side of the road at Parley Lane Parking and no crossing facility, so people will either walk along the road or have to cross the road to access the footpath. Please see attached photograph at JGL/5. (5) Parley Lane is a busy single carriageway semi-rural road with a national speed limit and BCP Council has responsibility for the road as the local highway authority. Hurn Court Lane is owned by the airport who therefore have responsibility for it. There is no public footpath along Hurn Court Lane after turning off Parley Lane to access the airport. Please see attached photograph at JGL/4. This results in pedestrians walking in the road or on the grass section next to the road on Hurn Court Lane to get to the airport terminal. This is dangerous as it is not a stable, safe public pathway and could lead to people falling into the road or being struck by vehicles, especially as people pull suitcases along. The airport has erected signs stating these is no pedestrian access, however, these are widely ignored. (6) A site visit and assessment in July 2023 by Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer and the Senior BCP Council Safety Officer following Billy’s death highlighted some fundamental safety issues. At this time no action has been taken around these safety issues, although matters have been discussed. Accordingly, the safety issues remain the same 17 months on from the site assessment, with a likely increasing number of passengers using the airport going forward. (7) I, therefore, have concerns that there could be future deaths given the manner in which users are accessing the airport and the lack of public transport and pedestrian access available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of pedestrian pathway and crossing facility at Parley Lane Parking

Wider context from the report

“(4) Many people access the airport on foot, either being dropped off and/or picked up on Parley Lane where there is no layby or drop off zone or by using nearby car parks and walking on foot to the airport. One such car park is at the Adventure Wonderland site and is known as Parley Lane Parking (Parley Lane Parking | Bournemouth Airport Parking). This is 0.9 miles from the airport, on the opposite side of Parley Lane which offers cheaper rates than Bournemouth Airport to park. There is no pathway on the side of the road at Parley Lane Parking and no crossing facility, so people will either walk along the road or have to cross the road to access the footpath. Please see attached photograph at JGL/5. (5) Parley Lane is a busy single carriageway semi-rural road with a national speed limit and BCP Council has responsibility for the road as the local highway authority. Hurn Court Lane is owned by the airport who therefore have responsibility for it. There is no public footpath along Hurn Court Lane after turning off Parley Lane to access the airport. Please see attached photograph at JGL/4. This results in pedestrians walking in the road or on the grass section next to the road on Hurn Court Lane to get to the airport terminal. This is dangerous as it is not a stable, safe public pathway and could lead to people falling into the road or being struck by vehicles, especially as people pull suitcases along. The airport has erected signs stating these is no pedestrian access, however, these are widely ignored. (6) A site visit and assessment in July 2023 by Dorset Police Road Casualty Reduction Officer and the Senior BCP Council Safety Officer following Billy’s death highlighted some fundamental safety issues. At this time no action has been taken around these safety issues, although matters have been discussed. Accordingly, the safety issues remain the same 17 months on from the site assessment, with a likely increasing number of passengers using the airport going forward. (7) I, therefore, have concerns that there could be future deaths given the manner in which users are accessing the airport and the lack of public transport and pedestrian access available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide safe pedestrian routes alongside roads; Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on reducing the Parley Lane speed limit from 60 to 40 mph.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The speed limit review has been completed and the reduction of the speed limit from 60 to 40mph is currently being consulted upon. The intent is to have implemented the 40mph speed limit by July 2025. An assessment for a vehicle activated sign shall follow when the speed limit has been reduced to 40mph.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the location for a vehicle-activated sign after the speed limit is reduced to 40 mph.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The other two actions were to review the speed limit on Parley Lane including assessing the location for a vehicle activated sign and to check the operation of the pedestrian facilities on the crossing facilities at the junction of Hurn Court Lane and Parley Lane.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-check the operation of pedestrian crossing facilities at the Hurn Court Lane and Parley Lane junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The other two actions were to review the speed limit on Parley Lane including assessing the location for a vehicle activated sign and to check the operation of the pedestrian facilities on the crossing facilities at the junction of Hurn Court Lane and Parley Lane.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the 40 mph Parley Lane speed limit by July 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The speed limit review has been completed and the reduction of the speed limit from 60 to 40mph is currently being consulted upon. The intent is to have implemented the 40mph speed limit by July 2025. An assessment for a vehicle activated sign shall follow when the speed limit has been reduced to 40mph.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the review of the Parley Lane speed limit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The other two actions were to review the speed limit on Parley Lane including assessing the location for a vehicle activated sign and to check the operation of the pedestrian facilities on the crossing facilities at the junction of Hurn Court Lane and Parley Lane.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support the airport in progressing construction of a footway into the airport.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although the council is not responsible for the provision of a pavement (footway) beyond the speed limit signs it does recognise that the provision of a pavement (footway) up to and into”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate with the airport whether to reinstate the previous bus service or increase bus-service frequency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council shall work with the airport to investigate if/how the previous service could be reinstated, or the frequency of bus services to the airport increased. This may need to be facilitated by the securing of funding from new development(s) at/in the vicinity of the airport.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Construct a pedestrian footpath alongside the BOH-owned section of Hurn Court Lane, subject to permitted development consultation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Hurn Court Lane Pedestrian Access: BOH has developed plans and will construct a pedestrian footpath alongside the part of Hurn Court Lane owned by BOH, with the support of BCP. The delivery will be subject to permitted development consultation, but the build plans will be developed in parallel so as the works can be completed in a timely manner. It is hoped that any footpath can be completed within the next 3-6 months.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an indicative enhanced bus timetable for airport staff and passengers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Public Transport: As part of airport expansion plans, there has been positive engagement to improve public transport to the airport between BOH, BCP and the local bus operator. An indicative enhanced timetable has been developed to meet the needs of current and future staff at changeover times as well as continuing to provide opportunities for passengers to access the airport by bus. It is intended that the service will operate at an increased frequency and will continue to provide a key link to Bournemouth town centre and railway station, to allow interchange with other public transport services. Final negotiations are currently underway to agree suitable contributions from the airport to support these additional journeys and to encourage an increased uptake in bus travel to the airport. Until these negotiations are concluded, BOH cannot set out a precise timetable.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop plans for a pedestrian footpath alongside the BOH-owned section of Hurn Court Lane.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Hurn Court Lane Pedestrian Access: BOH has developed plans and will construct a pedestrian footpath alongside the part of Hurn Court Lane owned by BOH, with the support of BCP. The delivery will be subject to permitted development consultation, but the build plans will be developed in parallel so as the works can be completed in a timely manner. It is hoped that any footpath can be completed within the next 3-6 months.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Negotiate airport contributions to support additional bus journeys and increased bus use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Public Transport: As part of airport expansion plans, there has been positive engagement to improve public transport to the airport between BOH, BCP and the local bus operator. An indicative enhanced timetable has been developed to meet the needs of current and future staff at changeover times as well as continuing to provide opportunities for passengers to access the airport by bus. It is intended that the service will operate at an increased frequency and will continue to provide a key link to Bournemouth town centre and railway station, to allow interchange with other public transport services. Final negotiations are currently underway to agree suitable contributions from the airport to support these additional journeys and to encourage an increased uptake in bus travel to the airport. Until these negotiations are concluded, BOH cannot set out a precise timetable.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make representations to BCP about safety arrangements for Parley Lane, its junction and the Adventure Wonderland car park.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Parley Lane/ Adventure Wonderland: BOH has no control over Parley Lane, Parley Lane Junction, or the Adventure Wonderland Parley Lane Car Park. BOH cannot take any action in respect of these areas and can, therefore, only make representations to BCP about what should happen, which it has done. Following the meetings with BCP, it is understood that (i) BCP are intending to reduce the 60mph speed limit to 40mph on Parley Lane which is currently subject to consultation; (ii) BCP have refused a retrospective planning application associated with the Adventure Wonderland Parley Lane Car Park operation; and (iii) BCP have checked the controlled crossing operation.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provision of a footway beyond the speed-limit signs is outside the council’s highway responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BCP Council response, action and timescale: Note: the site description in point 3 refers to Hurn Court Lane north of the junction, however, the photo shows Hurn Court Lane south of the junction. This response is regarding Hurn Court north. The council responsibility for the highway ends approximately 15 metres north (from the signalised junction) along Hurn Court Lane towards the Airport where the speed limit signs are located. Up to this point there is a pavement (footway).”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Private landowners are responsible for providing walking and cycling facilities on land beyond the council highway extent.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BCP Council response: As per reply to item 5 above. The land to the north of the signalised junction beyond the 20mph speed limit signs is the responsibility of private landowners who are responsible for the provision of any walking and cycling facilities on their land. The following plan (Fig.4.) and street view (Fig.5) show the council highway extent.”

Source location

Response from BCP Council
Page 4 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The airport cannot act on Parley Lane, its junction, or the Adventure Wonderland car park because it controls none of those areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Parley Lane/ Adventure Wonderland: BOH has no control over Parley Lane, Parley Lane Junction, or the Adventure Wonderland Parley Lane Car Park. BOH cannot take any action in respect of these areas and can, therefore, only make representations to BCP about what should happen, which it has done. Following the meetings with BCP, it is understood that (i) BCP are intending to reduce the 60mph speed limit to 40mph on Parley Lane which is currently subject to consultation; (ii) BCP have refused a retrospective planning application associated with the Adventure Wonderland Parley Lane Car Park operation; and (iii) BCP have checked the controlled crossing operation.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

BCP Council and the Highways Agency are responsible for Parley Lane, rather than the airport.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Second, the accident did not occur on land owned or controlled by BOH. The accident occurred on Parley Lane which is the main public highway outside of BOH. BOH does not own and has no responsibility for Parley Lane. Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council ("BCP") and the Highways Agency are responsible for Parley Lane.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The airport cannot provide a precise enhanced public-transport timetable until negotiations on contributions and additional journeys conclude.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Public Transport: As part of airport expansion plans, there has been positive engagement to improve public transport to the airport between BOH, BCP and the local bus operator. An indicative enhanced timetable has been developed to meet the needs of current and future staff at changeover times as well as continuing to provide opportunities for passengers to access the airport by bus. It is intended that the service will operate at an increased frequency and will continue to provide a key link to Bournemouth town centre and railway station, to allow interchange with other public transport services. Final negotiations are currently underway to agree suitable contributions from the airport to support these additional journeys and to encourage an increased uptake in bus travel to the airport. Until these negotiations are concluded, BOH cannot set out a precise timetable.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 2 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Remedial action from the July 2023 site assessment was directed to Dorset Council, BCP Council and/or the police.

    Stated by Bournemouth AirportRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    The death and accident did not result from any action or omission by the airport.

    Stated by Bournemouth AirportDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remedial action from the July 2023 site assessment was directed to Dorset Council, BCP Council and/or the police.

Verbatim wording from the response

“With regards to the site visit and assessment in July 2023 by Dorset Police and BCP, any remedial action was directed towards Dorset Council, BCP and/or the Police. BOH, therefore, does not propose to comment specifically on the remedial actions identified in the relevant site assessment.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 3 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The death and accident did not result from any action or omission by the airport.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BOH wishes to stress that Billy's death and the accident did not occur as a result of any actions or omissions on its behalf.”

Source location

Response from Bournemouth Airport
Page 1 · response
Published 6 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026