PFD report

Caden Stewart · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Oct 2021•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to communicate healthcare waiting status during handover
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable custody handoversPart of recurring concern: Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility
  2. Lack of awareness among Physical Education Instructors of PSI 58/2011 and its requirements
  3. Failure of officers to communicate healthcare needs and reported illness
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Remind PE staff through a Notice to Staff and regular briefings to understand PSI 58/2011 requirements and maintain appropriate gym supervision.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Use daily residential roll books, guidance prompts and NOMIS records to capture healthcare requests, follow-up actions and relevant wellbeing information for staff sharing.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 October 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate healthcare waiting status during handover

Wider context from the report

“3. The wing officer in charge did not check whether Caden had been seen by healthcare at any stage over the following hours nor did he inform his successor on handover that Caden was waiting to see healthcare and had not been seen ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable custody handovers; Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness among Physical Education Instructors of PSI 58/2011 and its requirements

Wider context from the report

“1. Physical Education Instructors were unaware of the existence of PSI 58/2011 and the requirements within ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of officers to communicate healthcare needs and reported illness

Wider context from the report

“2. There was a lack of communication between officers such that the physical education instructors did not inform the escort that Caden needed to see healthcare, the escort did not inform the wing officer in charge that Caden felt unwell and needed to see healthcare, none of the officers responsible for checking Caden’s welfare during patrol state were aware that he had reported feeling unwell and was waiting to see healthcare ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to check whether a person awaiting healthcare has been seen

Wider context from the report

“3. The wing officer in charge did not check whether Caden had been seen by healthcare at any stage over the following hours nor did he inform his successor on handover that Caden was waiting to see healthcare and had not been seen ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of case monitoring to identify cases requiring follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind PE staff through a Notice to Staff and regular briefings to understand PSI 58/2011 requirements and maintain appropriate gym supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In September 2021, following the inquest, a Notice to Staff was issued reminding PE staff of the need to understand the content and requirements of PSI 58/2011 and to ensure they maintain appropriate supervision of the gym at all times. The importance of this has also been reinforced during regular staff briefings.”

Source location

2021-0328-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 13 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use daily residential roll books, guidance prompts and NOMIS records to capture healthcare requests, follow-up actions and relevant wellbeing information for staff sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To ensure improved and effective information sharing regarding a prisoner’s well-being, in September 2021 the Young People Services Team introduced daily roll books onto the residential areas which record the amount of time each young person spends in various activities. The logs provide for comments to be added and ‘guidance prompts’ are now in place which outline the importance of providing this information so that it is available to all staff. The guidance prompts also explain the type of information staff should record, including where a young person has made a request to see healthcare. A Notice to Staff detailing the use of the roll books was issued to ensure all staff are aware of the need to record information about a young person in custody.”

Source location

2021-0328-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 13 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026