PFD report

Gabriele Kreichgauer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2019•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of clinical decision support to distinguish infected cat bite from cat scratch fever
  2. Lack of a feedback mechanism within clinical decision support
  3. Failure to complete a final check of considered treatment and treatment given
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of clinical decision support to distinguish infected cat bite from cat scratch fever

Wider context from the report

“(2) The junior doctor who saw Ms Kreichgauer used an internet resource called “Uptodate”. The evidence was that the Trust supplies the subscription for this. He searched under the phrase “cat bite” and was directed to a diagnosis of cat scratch fever. On this basis he planned to prescribe azithromycin. In fact, the correct diagnosis was that Ms Kreichgauer had an infected cat bite; the infective organism for this is different to the organism causing cat scratch fever; and the appropriate treatment is different. Even if she had been given antibiotics it is therefore likely that these would not have been effective. At the inquest the clinicians accepted that it would be helpful for there to be a warning on Uptodate pointing out the need to consider the possibility of infected cat bite (and the important difference between this and cat scratch fever) when searching under either term (“cat bite” or “cat scratch”). It was accepted that the Trust should be in a position to communicate with Uptodate to point out this concern. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a feedback mechanism within clinical decision support

Wider context from the report

“(3) There does not appear to be a feedback mechanism within Uptodate to allow clinicians to notify it of any concerns. Again, as a subscriber to Uptodate, this is a matter that the Trust is likely to be in a position to take up with them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete a final check of considered treatment and treatment given

Wider context from the report

“(1) Ms Kreichgauer left the department without being given antibiotics. The reason for this appears to have been that no-one did a final check on what treatment was considered and whether this had been given to her. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.