PFD report

Jamie Paul Woods · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Feb 2023•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Use of weaker methods for securing pre-cast concrete panels to vertical RSJs
  2. Lack of understanding of the importance of secure panel fixings
  3. Failure of inspections to identify weaker panel fixings
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Promoted information on building integrity, safe maintenance and periodic structural checks through agricultural safety stakeholder networks.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The incident involved an isolated bespoke solution, and correctly installed concrete panels have no indicated history of integrity or stability problems.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of weaker methods for securing pre-cast concrete panels to vertical RSJs

Wider context from the report

“1. The sections of box tubing used to secure one end of the concrete panels to the vertical RSJ was a weaker method of securing the concrete panels in place, as compared to the method typically used (securing the panel directly to the RSJ using metal brackets bolted to the rear of the panel). They had been in place for a number of years and would have appeared to have been present when Hawkins Farm was subject to inspections by outside agencies, yet no remedial action was required. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of understanding of the importance of secure panel fixings

Wider context from the report

“ii. There appears to be a lack of understanding of the importance of securing the panels in the optimal manner. It does not appear to have been understood by those working on the farm that the fixings that were used on the panel that collapsed were weaker, neither does it appear to have been appreciated by those that undertook inspections of the farm subsequent to the use of this weaker method of fixing. Publicising the risks and educating the farmers of the risks of departing from the recognised method of fixing the pre-cast concrete panels may reduce the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of inspections to identify weaker panel fixings

Wider context from the report

“ii. There appears to be a lack of understanding of the importance of securing the panels in the optimal manner. It does not appear to have been understood by those working on the farm that the fixings that were used on the panel that collapsed were weaker, neither does it appear to have been appreciated by those that undertook inspections of the farm subsequent to the use of this weaker method of fixing. Publicising the risks and educating the farmers of the risks of departing from the recognised method of fixing the pre-cast concrete panels may reduce the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure safe fastening of moved pre-cast concrete panels to vertical RSJs

Wider context from the report

“i. Pre-cast concrete panels are likely extensively used across farms throughout England and Wales. The equipment required to move panels between buildings is likely to be available on the majority of farms, meaning that there is a significant risk that farm owners/workers will move panels if necessary without the need to refer to external trades/professionals. As a consequence, there is a risk of the panels subsequently being fastened to vertical RSJs in a less secure manner, as occurred on Hawkins Farm. A collapsing concrete panel poses a clear risk of death, given their weight. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promoted information on building integrity, safe maintenance and periodic structural checks through agricultural safety stakeholder networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The HSE engages with a wide range of industry stakeholder and intermediaries to promulgate key messages and increase the awareness of the risks to health and safety in Agriculture. One part of this work is the distribution of timely messages following incidents. In February 2021 the HSE’s national agriculture team promoted information relating to building integrity through the Farm Safety Partnership (FSP*) chairs and Agriculture Industry Advisory Committee (AIAC**) members. This included the need to keep farm buildings in a safe condition and properly maintained and the importance of periodic structural checks The FSPs have a rolling programme of activities and building maintenance and work at height is regularly promoted. HSE will continue to look for opportunities to help farmers manage and control the risks on their premises, including those arising from building integrity.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 24 February 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The incident involved an isolated bespoke solution, and correctly installed concrete panels have no indicated history of integrity or stability problems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The circumstances associated with this instance appear to be an isolated bespoke fabricated solution which in the experience of the HSE is not replicated widely within agricultural buildings. Traditionally concrete panels are a fixed solution and not moved or routinely repurposed. The HSE enquiries looked at the wider use of the pre-cast panels on the farm which were found to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 1 · response
Published 24 February 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Continue seeking opportunities to help farmers manage building-integrity and other premises risks.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 February 2023.
  2. 2

    Explore promoting key building-integrity safety messages through Farm Safety Partnerships and the Agriculture Industry Advisory Committee.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 February 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue seeking opportunities to help farmers manage building-integrity and other premises risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The HSE engages with a wide range of industry stakeholder and intermediaries to promulgate key messages and increase the awareness of the risks to health and safety in Agriculture. One part of this work is the distribution of timely messages following incidents. In February 2021 the HSE’s national agriculture team promoted information relating to building integrity through the Farm Safety Partnership (FSP*) chairs and Agriculture Industry Advisory Committee (AIAC**) members. This included the need to keep farm buildings in a safe condition and properly maintained and the importance of periodic structural checks The FSPs have a rolling programme of activities and building maintenance and work at height is regularly promoted. HSE will continue to look for opportunities to help farmers manage and control the risks on their premises, including those arising from building integrity.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 24 February 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore promoting key building-integrity safety messages through Farm Safety Partnerships and the Agriculture Industry Advisory Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HSE’s work in the agriculture sector is regularly reviewed to reflect emerging issues and concerns in response to learning and recommendations following incidents. We update guidance where necessary and use briefings update industry and HSE inspectors. Further to your report we are exploring how we can promote the key aspects with the FSPs and AIAC.”

Source location

Response from Health and Safety Executive
Page 2 · response
Published 24 February 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026