PFD report

Patricia Steer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 May 2016•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of literature or guidance on the risk of air embolization during catheter changes
  2. Lack of staff awareness of the risk of air embolization during catheter changes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Published safety guidance addressing air embolism risk during central-line removal.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 May 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Professional organisations are best placed to communicate the risk to staff responsible for leadership, training, supervision and direct patient care.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of literature or guidance on the risk of air embolization during catheter changes

Wider context from the report

“(1) Neither the staff nurse who changed the catheter nor the supervising senior staff nurse who was present throughout the procedure were aware of the risk of air embolization in the process of changing the catheter, where as it was in this case, left uncapped and unclamped. Whilst the attending Consultant was aware of the risk, the Serious Incident Investigator identified that it had not been possible to locate any literature or guidance on this point, having contacted other Trusts, and making an extensive literature search. The relevant bibliography was made available to the inquest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff awareness of the risk of air embolization during catheter changes

Wider context from the report

“(1) Neither the staff nurse who changed the catheter nor the supervising senior staff nurse who was present throughout the procedure were aware of the risk of air embolization in the process of changing the catheter, where as it was in this case, left uncapped and unclamped. Whilst the attending Consultant was aware of the risk, the Serious Incident Investigator identified that it had not been possible to locate any literature or guidance on this point, having contacted other Trusts, and making an extensive literature search. The relevant bibliography was made available to the inquest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Published safety guidance addressing air embolism risk during central-line removal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work undertaken by the patient safety team to minimise risks associated with central lines:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 4 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Professional organisations are best placed to communicate the risk to staff responsible for leadership, training, supervision and direct patient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have discussed the issue with the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG), which includes representatives from the Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA), the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI), the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the College of Operating Department Practitioners (CODP). Their belief is that the risk is widely appreciated and is routinely covered in local training and protocols but they accept that the findings of your inquest indicate this was not the case in at least one organisation. These organisations have undertaken to raise awareness amongst their members about the risk of leaving a CVC line uncapped during use.”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 3 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appropriate guidance addressing the risk of leaving central venous catheter ports uncapped or exposed has been established.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to your specific concerns, we have been able to identify that appropriate guidance on this risk for nurses has been established. There are two key sources:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Published a rapid response report addressing risks from intravenous heparin flush solutions.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 May 2016.
  2. 2

    Implemented the Matching Michigan Project to reduce central-line infections.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 May 2016.
  3. 3

    Published a patient-safety signal addressing harm from retained guidewires after central venous access.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 May 2016.
  4. 4

    Published SIGNALS guidance addressing central-line extravasation injuries.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Published a rapid response report addressing risks from intravenous heparin flush solutions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work undertaken by the patient safety team to minimise risks associated with central lines:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 4 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implemented the Matching Michigan Project to reduce central-line infections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work undertaken by the patient safety team to minimise risks associated with central lines:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 4 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Published a patient-safety signal addressing harm from retained guidewires after central venous access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work undertaken by the patient safety team to minimise risks associated with central lines:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 4 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Published SIGNALS guidance addressing central-line extravasation injuries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work undertaken by the patient safety team to minimise risks associated with central lines:”

Source location

2016-0201-Response-by-NHS-Improvement
Page 4 · response
Published 25 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026