William Buchanan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Sep 2021•Dorset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of suitability and competence assessments for elderly mobility scooter purchasers

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. the Government

    No further action is considered necessary because existing provisions and limited evidence make a mandatory pre-purchase assessment disproportionate.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.
  2. the Government

    Existing product safety requirements provide appropriate protection and sufficient information for consumers to operate mobility scooters safely.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of suitability and competence assessments for elderly mobility scooter purchasers

Wider context from the report

“(1) Lifestyle and Mobility completed a home assessment including a suitability questionnaire as Mr Buchanan was obtaining his scooter through the Mobility scheme. If clients purchase a scooter privately, the company has a detailed questionnaire they complete which has been designed in conjunction with the British Healthcare Trades Association. However, I was very concerned to learn that elderly individuals can purchase mobility scooters online or in other stores without any assessment whatsoever being completed to assess their suitability or competence to use one. This gives rise to a concern that future deaths could occur if action is not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further action is considered necessary because existing provisions and limited evidence make a mandatory pre-purchase assessment disproportionate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope this response reassures you that the product safety regime already provides consumers with an appropriate level of protection against unsafe products and seeks to ensure that consumers have the information they need to operate/use products safely. Due to the provisions already in place and limited evidence we have it would be disproportionate to place an obligation on individuals to undertake an assessment before purchasing specific products. I”

Source location

2021-0300-Response-from-Department-for-BEIS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing product safety requirements provide appropriate protection and sufficient information for consumers to operate mobility scooters safely.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Government’s top priority is to keep people safe, which is why goods sold in the UK must meet some of the strictest safety laws in the world. We have in place a product safety regime that establishes what is expected of manufacturers and retailers in relation to the products they make available on the market.”

Source location

2021-0300-Response-from-Department-for-BEIS_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026