PFD report

Nicolette Elizabeth McCARTHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Nov 2024•East Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Inadequacy of national guidance on smoking and section 17 leave
    Part of recurring concern: NHS smoke-free policy inadequately protects safety in mental health hospitals
  2. Failure of the NHS smoke-free policy to reflect the safety requirements of mental health wards and patients seeking leave to smoke
    Part of recurring concern: NHS smoke-free policy inadequately protects safety in mental health hospitals
  3. Poor supervision of patients smoking during short grounds leave
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Advance the Tobacco and Vapes Bill to expand smoke-free-place provisions, including potential outdoor spaces.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 November 2024.
  2. Action

    Conduct consultation on making hospital grounds smoke-free and consider whether designated smoking areas are appropriate.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 November 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.8

  1. Position

    NICE and DHSC are responsible for responding to concerns about national smoking and Section 17 leave policy.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of national guidance on smoking and section 17 leave

Wider context from the report

“1) During the course of the inquest, I heard evidence from clinicians and staff at the Trust to the effect that the NHS England smoke free policy is placing mental health in patients at an increased risk from self-harm and suicide. 2) Although smoking cessation advice and treatment (e.g. gum, vapes etc.) are routinely offered to patients, the evidence was that many struggle to give up smoking on their admission to the ward, in part because the anxiety associated with stopping exacerbates their mental health symptoms. Staff also felt that forcing patients to stop smoking against their will (e.g. by prohibiting them from smoking while on leave) would have a negative effect on their sense of autonomy and wellbeing, which are important for recovery. 3) The Trust understand that they are bound by the Health Act 2006 and by NHS England policy not to permit or facilitate smoking on the ward or anywhere on the grounds of the hospital. This is taken seriously and is interpreted to mean that staff are prohibited from facilitating smoking, for example by granting leave for the purpose of smoking or by escorting patients to smoke outside on short periods of leave. Senior staff also believed that it would be contrary to NHS policy to permit smoking in a secure area, for example the enclosed ward garden. At the same time, it was acknowledged that patients would inevitably seek leave to smoke and that this could not be denied without a negative impact on their mental health. 4) The jury heard evidence that patients, like Mrs McCarthy, were routinely given 15-minute grounds leave for the purpose of smoking, a practice that is discouraged by the Trust. Clinical staff felt that the policy placed them in a difficult position, torn between the need to comply with the smoke free policy, while also supporting patient autonomy and keeping safe those patients who are at a higher risk of self-harm or suicide. 5) There is a further contradiction caused by the smoke free policy, in that patients are not permitted to smoke on the grounds, but are not supposed to leave the grounds during short periods of ‘grounds’ leave. The result is that patients would spend their 15-minute leave smoking by the side of the road on the edge of the ward grounds, which is a poorly supervised area, and staff would avoid asking them too closely where they were going and would avoid standing close to them, even when smoking themselves. This contributed to the circumstances that allowed Mrs McCarthy to slip away unnoticed and ultimately to take her own life. 6) I also heard evidence from senior staff that the national policy guidance intended to address smoking and s17 leave (e.g. the NICE guidance and CQC guidance) does not adequately resolve these contradictions. 7) I am concerned that the NHS smoke free policy, while clearly motivated by a genuine and pressing concern to protect life and promote health, may not be adequately tailored to reflect the safety requirements of mental health wards or the reality that some mental health patients will inevitably seek short periods of leave to smoke. Action may need to be taken at the national policy level to provide clearer guidance and/or review the law to reduce the risk of patients in mental health wards absconding while on unescorted grounds leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — NHS smoke-free policy inadequately protects safety in mental health hospitals.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the NHS smoke-free policy to reflect the safety requirements of mental health wards and patients seeking leave to smoke

Wider context from the report

“1) During the course of the inquest, I heard evidence from clinicians and staff at the Trust to the effect that the NHS England smoke free policy is placing mental health in patients at an increased risk from self-harm and suicide. 2) Although smoking cessation advice and treatment (e.g. gum, vapes etc.) are routinely offered to patients, the evidence was that many struggle to give up smoking on their admission to the ward, in part because the anxiety associated with stopping exacerbates their mental health symptoms. Staff also felt that forcing patients to stop smoking against their will (e.g. by prohibiting them from smoking while on leave) would have a negative effect on their sense of autonomy and wellbeing, which are important for recovery. 3) The Trust understand that they are bound by the Health Act 2006 and by NHS England policy not to permit or facilitate smoking on the ward or anywhere on the grounds of the hospital. This is taken seriously and is interpreted to mean that staff are prohibited from facilitating smoking, for example by granting leave for the purpose of smoking or by escorting patients to smoke outside on short periods of leave. Senior staff also believed that it would be contrary to NHS policy to permit smoking in a secure area, for example the enclosed ward garden. At the same time, it was acknowledged that patients would inevitably seek leave to smoke and that this could not be denied without a negative impact on their mental health. 4) The jury heard evidence that patients, like Mrs McCarthy, were routinely given 15-minute grounds leave for the purpose of smoking, a practice that is discouraged by the Trust. Clinical staff felt that the policy placed them in a difficult position, torn between the need to comply with the smoke free policy, while also supporting patient autonomy and keeping safe those patients who are at a higher risk of self-harm or suicide. 5) There is a further contradiction caused by the smoke free policy, in that patients are not permitted to smoke on the grounds, but are not supposed to leave the grounds during short periods of ‘grounds’ leave. The result is that patients would spend their 15-minute leave smoking by the side of the road on the edge of the ward grounds, which is a poorly supervised area, and staff would avoid asking them too closely where they were going and would avoid standing close to them, even when smoking themselves. This contributed to the circumstances that allowed Mrs McCarthy to slip away unnoticed and ultimately to take her own life. 6) I also heard evidence from senior staff that the national policy guidance intended to address smoking and s17 leave (e.g. the NICE guidance and CQC guidance) does not adequately resolve these contradictions. 7) I am concerned that the NHS smoke free policy, while clearly motivated by a genuine and pressing concern to protect life and promote health, may not be adequately tailored to reflect the safety requirements of mental health wards or the reality that some mental health patients will inevitably seek short periods of leave to smoke. Action may need to be taken at the national policy level to provide clearer guidance and/or review the law to reduce the risk of patients in mental health wards absconding while on unescorted grounds leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — NHS smoke-free policy inadequately protects safety in mental health hospitals.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Poor supervision of patients smoking during short grounds leave

Wider context from the report

“1) During the course of the inquest, I heard evidence from clinicians and staff at the Trust to the effect that the NHS England smoke free policy is placing mental health in patients at an increased risk from self-harm and suicide. 2) Although smoking cessation advice and treatment (e.g. gum, vapes etc.) are routinely offered to patients, the evidence was that many struggle to give up smoking on their admission to the ward, in part because the anxiety associated with stopping exacerbates their mental health symptoms. Staff also felt that forcing patients to stop smoking against their will (e.g. by prohibiting them from smoking while on leave) would have a negative effect on their sense of autonomy and wellbeing, which are important for recovery. 3) The Trust understand that they are bound by the Health Act 2006 and by NHS England policy not to permit or facilitate smoking on the ward or anywhere on the grounds of the hospital. This is taken seriously and is interpreted to mean that staff are prohibited from facilitating smoking, for example by granting leave for the purpose of smoking or by escorting patients to smoke outside on short periods of leave. Senior staff also believed that it would be contrary to NHS policy to permit smoking in a secure area, for example the enclosed ward garden. At the same time, it was acknowledged that patients would inevitably seek leave to smoke and that this could not be denied without a negative impact on their mental health. 4) The jury heard evidence that patients, like Mrs McCarthy, were routinely given 15-minute grounds leave for the purpose of smoking, a practice that is discouraged by the Trust. Clinical staff felt that the policy placed them in a difficult position, torn between the need to comply with the smoke free policy, while also supporting patient autonomy and keeping safe those patients who are at a higher risk of self-harm or suicide. 5) There is a further contradiction caused by the smoke free policy, in that patients are not permitted to smoke on the grounds, but are not supposed to leave the grounds during short periods of ‘grounds’ leave. The result is that patients would spend their 15-minute leave smoking by the side of the road on the edge of the ward grounds, which is a poorly supervised area, and staff would avoid asking them too closely where they were going and would avoid standing close to them, even when smoking themselves. This contributed to the circumstances that allowed Mrs McCarthy to slip away unnoticed and ultimately to take her own life. 6) I also heard evidence from senior staff that the national policy guidance intended to address smoking and s17 leave (e.g. the NICE guidance and CQC guidance) does not adequately resolve these contradictions. 7) I am concerned that the NHS smoke free policy, while clearly motivated by a genuine and pressing concern to protect life and promote health, may not be adequately tailored to reflect the safety requirements of mental health wards or the reality that some mental health patients will inevitably seek short periods of leave to smoke. Action may need to be taken at the national policy level to provide clearer guidance and/or review the law to reduce the risk of patients in mental health wards absconding while on unescorted grounds leave. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Advance the Tobacco and Vapes Bill to expand smoke-free-place provisions, including potential outdoor spaces.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may also be aware that the Department is currently taking action to tackle the harms of second-hand smoking through the Tobacco and Vapes Bill which is currently making its way through Parliament. Part of the Bill provides ministers with powers to expand the current smoke-free places provisions in the Health Act 2006 to more public places and workplaces, including outdoor spaces. In England, we have announced our intention to make outside hospital grounds smoke-free. This will be subject to a consultative process and as part of this we will consider whether designated areas for smoking are appropriate.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct consultation on making hospital grounds smoke-free and consider whether designated smoking areas are appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may also be aware that the Department is currently taking action to tackle the harms of second-hand smoking through the Tobacco and Vapes Bill which is currently making its way through Parliament. Part of the Bill provides ministers with powers to expand the current smoke-free places provisions in the Health Act 2006 to more public places and workplaces, including outdoor spaces. In England, we have announced our intention to make outside hospital grounds smoke-free. This will be subject to a consultative process and as part of this we will consider whether designated areas for smoking are appropriate.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NICE and DHSC are responsible for responding to concerns about national smoking and Section 17 leave policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have also addressed your concerns to NICE and the DHSC, and it would be appropriate for these organisations to respond to the Coroner, as the responsible policy holders for the issues raised. Individual NHS Trusts are responsible for the local implementation of these policies and not the wider NHS England Estates Team.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual NHS trusts are responsible for locally implementing smoke-free policies, rather than NHS England’s wider Estates Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have also addressed your concerns to NICE and the DHSC, and it would be appropriate for these organisations to respond to the Coroner, as the responsible policy holders for the issues raised. Individual NHS Trusts are responsible for the local implementation of these policies and not the wider NHS England Estates Team.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There is no known published evidence that smoke-free policies increase mental health patients’ risk of self-harm or suicide.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report states that NHS England’s smoke free policy places mental health inpatients at an increased risk of self-harm and suicide. Currently, there is no known published evidence that smoke free policies place patients at an increased risk of self-harm or suicide.²”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contradictions in national policy concerning smoking cessation in acute mental-health inpatient care fall outside NICE’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given that the matters of concern relate to contradictions in national policy, these are not areas that are within NICE’s remit. We believe that the issues raised are best addressed by NHS England, and I note that your report has also been sent to them. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) may also be able to provide useful feedback to the points raised.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is considered best placed to address contradictions in national policy concerning smoking cessation in acute mental-health inpatient care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given that the matters of concern relate to contradictions in national policy, these are not areas that are within NICE’s remit. We believe that the issues raised are best addressed by NHS England, and I note that your report has also been sent to them. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) may also be able to provide useful feedback to the points raised.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing legal and regulatory arrangements provide that Section 17 leave requires clinician authorisation and risk assessment and should not facilitate smoking breaks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to your concerns regarding a lack of clarity around using Section 17 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to allow inpatients a short leave of absence in order to take a smoking break. Under Section 17 of the Act, a leave of absence can only be authorised by the patient’s responsible clinician and would require a risk assessment to be undertaken. The Care Quality Commission’s guidance: Smokefree policies in mental health inpatient services³ makes it clear that Section 17 should not be used to facilitate smoking breaks.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for addressing concerns about national guidance and policy, while the NHS trust is addressing local issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that, in its response to your report, NHS England will address your concerns around national guidance and policy and is also engaging with the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust to provide information about the local issues you have raised.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Research indicates that smoke-free policies do not exacerbate mental health symptoms, and trusts have implemented them with few unintended consequences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand the concerns raised in your report about whether a smoke-free policy covering hospital grounds may place mental health inpatients at an increased risk from self-harm and suicide. However, research carried out on smoking bans in psychiatric inpatient settings⁴ indicates that smoking cessation does not exacerbate mental health symptoms. I am also aware of a number of mental health trusts that have implemented smoke-free policies successfully, resulting in high rates of compliance and few unintended consequences.”

Source location

Response from DHSC
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning nationally and regionally.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 November 2024.
  2. 2

    Seek assurance from the relevant system about local arrangements and processes addressing the Coroner’s concerns.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 November 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    External research organisations or individuals, rather than NICE, are expected to investigate unanswered research questions identified in NICE guidance.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share resulting learning nationally and regionally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Nicolette, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek assurance from the relevant system about local arrangements and processes addressing the Coroner’s concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s South East regional colleagues are also in the process of seeking assurance from the relevant system regarding local arrangements and processes with regard to the concerns raised by the Coroner.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

External research organisations or individuals, rather than NICE, are expected to investigate unanswered research questions identified in NICE guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our research recommendations are all unanswered research questions that emerge during the development of NICE guidance. These are uncertainties that the guideline developers have identified during the development of the guidance or where robust evidence is lacking.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 2 · response
Published 28 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026