Christopher Sparks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Nov 2020•Essex

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of a clearly marked designated area keeping lorry drivers visible
  2. Failure to assign a banksman to supervise safe loading
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide banksman assistance for hazardous vehicle and load movements
  3. Unavailability of correct equipment for safely moving and loading manufactured products
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clearly marked designated area keeping lorry drivers visible

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was no clearly marked designated area established where a lorry driver can be visible at all times. The deployment of cones and signage would have assisted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assign a banksman to supervise safe loading

Wider context from the report

“(2) PCR had not assigned a banksman to supervise the safe loading. Especially in the loading of loads of such weight and size as the balcony frame, there should be a banksman employed ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide banksman assistance for hazardous vehicle and load movements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of correct equipment for safely moving and loading manufactured products

Wider context from the report

“(4) PCR Steel did not have available, from the design stage onwards, the correct equipment to move safely and load the products they manufacture. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an approved and agreed loading and lifting plan

Wider context from the report

“(1) Ahead of the incident, there was no approved, safe loading and lifting plan in place and agreed between the two firms ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe planning and control of lifting operations.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026