PFD report

Chloe Angela Ulett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Feb 2026•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
9

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
5

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised9

  1. Failure to routinely measure ammonia levels in adults presenting with behavioural change and confusion
  2. Lack of guidance on referral pathways for raised ammonia levels
  3. Failure of RCEM investigation guidance to identify when metabolic screens and ammonia levels are clinically indicated
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Remind midwives to recognise unexplained neurological or behavioural symptoms as clinical red flags and escalate them promptly.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 February 2026.
  2. Action

    Highlight this case and related ammonia-testing learning, resources, and prior Regulation 28 findings in the tri-annual Safety Bulletin.

    Stated by Faculty of Intensive Care MedicineStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 February 2026.
  3. Action

    Commission an article on metabolic conditions in the peripartum period for dissemination through The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Journal.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 February 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.7

  1. Position

    Development of guidance on this area is best dealt with by specialist societies such as RCEM or BIMDG.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely measure ammonia levels in adults presenting with behavioural change and confusion

Wider context from the report

“2. There are no identified NICE or BMJ best practice guidelines which currently recommend testing of ammonia levels for undifferentiated acutely presenting confused patients. 3. Nationally, early measurement of ammonia levels in adults presenting to the emergency department and other units for investigation and management of behavioural change and confusion are not routine practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on referral pathways for raised ammonia levels

Wider context from the report

“4. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guideline ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance in Adult Emergency Departments’ (Oct 2023) was the most appropriate guideline at the time, it advises doing tests as clinically indicated including appropriate metabolic screen to include blood tests to check ammonia levels. 5. The RCEM guidance was not, however, considered by any of the practitioners in this case (the deceased was treated in the emergency department, by the acute medical team and then in intensive care with several other specialities consulting before ammonia testing was recommended by neurology). 6. The evidence was that this RCEM guidance is not yet embedded in adult medicine in the emergency department. 7. Further, evidence was given that the content and phrasing of the RCEM guidance was not helpful in the context of a case of acute behavioural disorder resulting from a urea cycle disorder because urea cycle disorders or metabolic disorders (‘ABD’) are not contained in the table of potential factors leading to ABD presentation in section 1, and in section 4 the recommended investigations do not assist in identifying when metabolic screens, and specifically ammonia levels, are clinically indicated. Nor is it clear why ammonia levels are placed in brackets. Additionally, there is no guidance as to the appropriate referral pathway to be followed when ammonia levels are raised. The RCEM guidance was updated in May 2025 but these matters have not changed from the 2023 version. 8. It was acknowledged that the presentation of adults with undiagnosed Urea Cycle Disorders is very rare and ammonia levels will not normally be clinically indicated for patients with ABD. However, it is the rarity of these presentations and the likely inexperience of those outside inherited metabolic diseases teams that gives rise to the need for clear guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of RCEM investigation guidance to identify when metabolic screens and ammonia levels are clinically indicated

Wider context from the report

“4. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guideline ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance in Adult Emergency Departments’ (Oct 2023) was the most appropriate guideline at the time, it advises doing tests as clinically indicated including appropriate metabolic screen to include blood tests to check ammonia levels. 5. The RCEM guidance was not, however, considered by any of the practitioners in this case (the deceased was treated in the emergency department, by the acute medical team and then in intensive care with several other specialities consulting before ammonia testing was recommended by neurology). 6. The evidence was that this RCEM guidance is not yet embedded in adult medicine in the emergency department. 7. Further, evidence was given that the content and phrasing of the RCEM guidance was not helpful in the context of a case of acute behavioural disorder resulting from a urea cycle disorder because urea cycle disorders or metabolic disorders (‘ABD’) are not contained in the table of potential factors leading to ABD presentation in section 1, and in section 4 the recommended investigations do not assist in identifying when metabolic screens, and specifically ammonia levels, are clinically indicated. Nor is it clear why ammonia levels are placed in brackets. Additionally, there is no guidance as to the appropriate referral pathway to be followed when ammonia levels are raised. The RCEM guidance was updated in May 2025 but these matters have not changed from the 2023 version. 8. It was acknowledged that the presentation of adults with undiagnosed Urea Cycle Disorders is very rare and ammonia levels will not normally be clinically indicated for patients with ABD. However, it is the rarity of these presentations and the likely inexperience of those outside inherited metabolic diseases teams that gives rise to the need for clear guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider ammonia testing nationally, causing risk of delayed diagnosis

Wider context from the report

“9. It was further identified that inherited metabolic disease specialists are aware that a previously undiagnosed urea cycle disorders may be unmasked by giving birth and present for the first time in the post-partum period with symptoms of altered GCS including confusion, excessive drowsiness, seizures but this association is not known outside this speciality even in those caring for women in the post-partum period. 10. Following Miss Ulett's death the University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust ('UHB') assessed the speciality teams who could encounter patients presenting with altered consciousness due to unmasked previous undiagnosed urea cycle disorder and identified the relevant specialities were emergency medicine, acute medical, intensive care medicine and maternity services. 11. Whilst UHB has done a lot of work internally with the specialities identified to raise awareness of the potential presentation of an unmasked previously undiagnosed urea cycle disorder to an emergency department with acute behavioural disturbance and the need for consideration of ammonia testing at an early stage, there remains a national risk from delay in diagnosis because ammonia testing has not been considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Short diagnostic and treatment window for metabolic disorders presenting with behavioural change and confusion

Wider context from the report

“1. The window of opportunity to consider and make a diagnosis of a metabolic disorder and institute effective treatment is very short, 24 to 48 hours from the commencement of symptoms, and relies on early measurement of ammonia in an adult presenting with behavioural change and confusion. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Omission of urea cycle and metabolic disorders from RCEM behavioural disturbance risk factors

Wider context from the report

“4. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guideline ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance in Adult Emergency Departments’ (Oct 2023) was the most appropriate guideline at the time, it advises doing tests as clinically indicated including appropriate metabolic screen to include blood tests to check ammonia levels. 5. The RCEM guidance was not, however, considered by any of the practitioners in this case (the deceased was treated in the emergency department, by the acute medical team and then in intensive care with several other specialities consulting before ammonia testing was recommended by neurology). 6. The evidence was that this RCEM guidance is not yet embedded in adult medicine in the emergency department. 7. Further, evidence was given that the content and phrasing of the RCEM guidance was not helpful in the context of a case of acute behavioural disorder resulting from a urea cycle disorder because urea cycle disorders or metabolic disorders (‘ABD’) are not contained in the table of potential factors leading to ABD presentation in section 1, and in section 4 the recommended investigations do not assist in identifying when metabolic screens, and specifically ammonia levels, are clinically indicated. Nor is it clear why ammonia levels are placed in brackets. Additionally, there is no guidance as to the appropriate referral pathway to be followed when ammonia levels are raised. The RCEM guidance was updated in May 2025 but these matters have not changed from the 2023 version. 8. It was acknowledged that the presentation of adults with undiagnosed Urea Cycle Disorders is very rare and ammonia levels will not normally be clinically indicated for patients with ABD. However, it is the rarity of these presentations and the likely inexperience of those outside inherited metabolic diseases teams that gives rise to the need for clear guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of best-practice guidance recommending ammonia testing for undifferentiated acutely confused patients

Wider context from the report

“2. There are no identified NICE or BMJ best practice guidelines which currently recommend testing of ammonia levels for undifferentiated acutely presenting confused patients. 3. Nationally, early measurement of ammonia levels in adults presenting to the emergency department and other units for investigation and management of behavioural change and confusion are not routine practice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness outside inherited metabolic disease teams of postpartum presentation of undiagnosed urea cycle disorders

Wider context from the report

“9. It was further identified that inherited metabolic disease specialists are aware that a previously undiagnosed urea cycle disorders may be unmasked by giving birth and present for the first time in the post-partum period with symptoms of altered GCS including confusion, excessive drowsiness, seizures but this association is not known outside this speciality even in those caring for women in the post-partum period. 10. Following Miss Ulett's death the University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust ('UHB') assessed the speciality teams who could encounter patients presenting with altered consciousness due to unmasked previous undiagnosed urea cycle disorder and identified the relevant specialities were emergency medicine, acute medical, intensive care medicine and maternity services. 11. Whilst UHB has done a lot of work internally with the specialities identified to raise awareness of the potential presentation of an unmasked previously undiagnosed urea cycle disorder to an emergency department with acute behavioural disturbance and the need for consideration of ammonia testing at an early stage, there remains a national risk from delay in diagnosis because ammonia testing has not been considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to embed RCEM acute behavioural disturbance guidance in adult emergency medicine

Wider context from the report

“4. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) guideline ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance in Adult Emergency Departments’ (Oct 2023) was the most appropriate guideline at the time, it advises doing tests as clinically indicated including appropriate metabolic screen to include blood tests to check ammonia levels. 5. The RCEM guidance was not, however, considered by any of the practitioners in this case (the deceased was treated in the emergency department, by the acute medical team and then in intensive care with several other specialities consulting before ammonia testing was recommended by neurology). 6. The evidence was that this RCEM guidance is not yet embedded in adult medicine in the emergency department. 7. Further, evidence was given that the content and phrasing of the RCEM guidance was not helpful in the context of a case of acute behavioural disorder resulting from a urea cycle disorder because urea cycle disorders or metabolic disorders (‘ABD’) are not contained in the table of potential factors leading to ABD presentation in section 1, and in section 4 the recommended investigations do not assist in identifying when metabolic screens, and specifically ammonia levels, are clinically indicated. Nor is it clear why ammonia levels are placed in brackets. Additionally, there is no guidance as to the appropriate referral pathway to be followed when ammonia levels are raised. The RCEM guidance was updated in May 2025 but these matters have not changed from the 2023 version. 8. It was acknowledged that the presentation of adults with undiagnosed Urea Cycle Disorders is very rare and ammonia levels will not normally be clinically indicated for patients with ABD. However, it is the rarity of these presentations and the likely inexperience of those outside inherited metabolic diseases teams that gives rise to the need for clear guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute behavioural disturbance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind midwives to recognise unexplained neurological or behavioural symptoms as clinical red flags and escalate them promptly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Learning from this case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion when women present with unexplained neurological or behavioural symptoms. Midwives are reminded to treat such presentations as clinical red flags and to escalate concerns promptly using established local pathways.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Highlight this case and related ammonia-testing learning, resources, and prior Regulation 28 findings in the tri-annual Safety Bulletin.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to raise awareness, we will highlight this case in our tri-annual Safety Bulletin. The Safety Bulletin is sent to all Fellows and Members of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, and is a mechanism for promoting learning, with the aim of reducing risk. Through the Safety Bulletin, we will signpost open access resources for and will also highlight the utility of testing ammonia levels in encephalopathy of unknown cause.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission an article on metabolic conditions in the peripartum period for dissemination through The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Journal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the concern that there may be a lack of awareness of urea cycle disorders amongst obstetricians, the RCOG has commissioned an article covering ‘Metabolic Conditions in the Peripartum Period’, to be published in The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist Journal (TOG). This journal is widely read by members, fellows and trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology, and as such, is an effective way of disseminating this clinical information.”

Source location

2026-0086 Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Development of guidance on this area is best dealt with by specialist societies such as RCEM or BIMDG.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe that this is an area best dealt with by specialist societies, such as the RCEM or the British Inherited Metabolic Diseases Group (BIMDG). We note that you have already written to RCEM regarding their guidance and indicated that during the course of your inquest, evidence indicated that this guidance is not embedded in adult medicine at University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. NICE does not have anything to add to the recommendations provided by the RCEM guideline.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No additional recommendations are considered necessary because the existing RCEM guideline already addresses the relevant concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe that this is an area best dealt with by specialist societies, such as the RCEM or the British Inherited Metabolic Diseases Group (BIMDG). We note that you have already written to RCEM regarding their guidance and indicated that during the course of your inquest, evidence indicated that this guidance is not embedded in adult medicine at University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. NICE does not have anything to add to the recommendations provided by the RCEM guideline.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Matters in points 3–11 are outside the respondent’s role, so it will not comment further on them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Points 3-11 do not relate to the role of the RCM and therefore we feel unable to comment further.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NICE is responsible for developing national guidance on maternal assessment and associated adult medical assessment and treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Midwives are expected to practise in line with national guidance and local policies. In the absence of specific recommendations for ammonia testing, midwives would not routinely initiate such investigations without discussing clinical concerns with medical staff. NICE are responsible for development of national guidance to address maternal assessment or to link to associated guidance for adult medical assessment and treatment. The RCM would contribute professional expertise through consultation process as appropriate.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for reviewing local and regional protocols to consider ammonia testing for altered behaviour or confusion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions should include reinforcing education on the recognition of acute changes in mental status and their potential clinical significance. This should be delivered through mandatory training and regular clinical updates and strengthened through practice education across NHS England. Local and regional protocols should also be reviewed and updated to ensure consideration of ammonia testing when altered behaviour or confusion is identified, which is within the remit of NHS England.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Without specific ammonia-testing recommendations, midwives follow national guidance and local policies and do not routinely initiate testing without medical discussion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. There are no identified NICE or BMJ best practice guidelines which currently recommend testing of ammonia levels for undifferentiated acutely presenting confused patients.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine ammonia testing is not warranted in all confused patients because hyperammonaemia is a diagnosis of exclusion and sepsis requires priority assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Hyperammonaemia is rare but the presentation of those with confusion due to any cause is high in the acute setting. 10-20% of all admissions present with confusion due to a wide variety of issues (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Delirium, prevention, diagnosis and management (CG103). London: NICE; 2010 (updated 2019)). Hyperammonaemia remains a diagnosis of exclusion and as such, ammonia levels are not usually in the first bloods sent for a patient, as the primary aim in someone presenting with confusion is to ensure they do not have sepsis. As highlighted by this challenging case, hyperammonaemia remains a diagnosis that should be carefully considered when the cause of acute confusion is unclear.”

Source location

2026-0086- Response from Royal College of Physicians
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Share information about hyperammonaemia with RCP members via the RCP website.

    Stated by Royal College of PhysiciansStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 February 2026.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Service-level maternity changes are outside the respondent’s statutory and operational authority.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share information about hyperammonaemia with RCP members via the RCP website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the RCP, the concerns of hyperammonaemia have been discussed at the Patient Safety Committee and the RCP has committed to raising the profile by sharing this issue with their members via the RCP website within the coming months.”

Source location

2026-0086- Response from Royal College of Physicians
Page 2 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Service-level maternity changes are outside the respondent’s statutory and operational authority.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCM is a professional association and trade union and does not hold statutory or operational responsibility for the delivery of maternity services. However, we play a key role in representing the professional voice of midwives, influencing policy, representing midwives and maternity support workers both individually and collectively in the workplace and working collaboratively with practice partners to advocate for safe, effective and high-quality maternity care. The response to this report is in the context of our responsibilities as a stakeholder within maternity services.”

Source location

2026-0086 - Response from Royal College of Midwives
Page 1 · response
Published 13 February 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
5/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026