PFD report

Roshen Abbas Ladak-Ebrahim · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 May 2013•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to prevent patients at risk of self-harm from being left alone
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement protective measures for people at risk of self-harm
  2. Failure to arrange follow-up assessment of the effect of medication with an increased risk of self-harm
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably follow up identified mental-health safety concerns
  3. Lack of structured assessment and recording of self-harm risk factors
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Publish supplementary guidance clarifying when confidential information may be disclosed in the public interest.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2013.
  2. Action

    Publish a consensus statement promoting information sharing to help prevent suicide, within the relevant law.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2013.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing NICE clinical guidelines sufficiently address assessing immediate self-harm and suicide risk.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent patients at risk of self-harm from being left alone

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to giving guidance to health care professionals on the steps that should be taken to ensure that a patient is kept safe by those looking after the patient. In particular informing those looking after a patient that the patient should not be left alone where there is a concern that the patient is at risk of harming themselves. Evidence heard at the inquest suggested that there was some confusion over whether this advice would breach a patient's confidentiality. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement protective measures for people at risk of self-harm.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to arrange follow-up assessment of the effect of medication with an increased risk of self-harm

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to guidance whereby a doctor working in the community mental health agencies is required to have a consultation with a patient before prescribing medication that carries an increased risk of self-harm when first prescribed and arranges to see the patient again to assess the effect of the medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably follow up identified mental-health safety concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of structured assessment and recording of self-harm risk factors

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to issuing guidance when assessing risk of self-harm. The suggestion at the inquest was to firstly assess and record whether there is an immediate risk of self-harm. If there is no immediate risk of self-harm then the assessment should focus on whether there are any thoughts of self-harm, (recording frequency, duration, intensity etc). Whether there is a plan, (recording the details of the plan or plans, etc) and whether there is an intention to end life. Whether the individual is vulnerable to acting on impulse and any past history. The use of high, medium and low risk were considered unhelpful when assessing risk of self-harm. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Confusion about confidentiality when providing safety supervision for patients at risk of self-harm

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to giving guidance to health care professionals on the steps that should be taken to ensure that a patient is kept safe by those looking after the patient. In particular informing those looking after a patient that the patient should not be left alone where there is a concern that the patient is at risk of harming themselves. Evidence heard at the inquest suggested that there was some confusion over whether this advice would breach a patient's confidentiality. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement protective measures for people at risk of self-harm; Unreliable confidentiality arrangements for sharing safety-critical welfare information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of unhelpful high, medium and low risk categories in self-harm risk assessment

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to issuing guidance when assessing risk of self-harm. The suggestion at the inquest was to firstly assess and record whether there is an immediate risk of self-harm. If there is no immediate risk of self-harm then the assessment should focus on whether there are any thoughts of self-harm, (recording frequency, duration, intensity etc). Whether there is a plan, (recording the details of the plan or plans, etc) and whether there is an intention to end life. Whether the individual is vulnerable to acting on impulse and any past history. The use of high, medium and low risk were considered unhelpful when assessing risk of self-harm. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consult patients before first prescribing medication with an increased risk of self-harm

Wider context from the report

“Consideration to be given to guidance whereby a doctor working in the community mental health agencies is required to have a consultation with a patient before prescribing medication that carries an increased risk of self-harm when first prescribed and arranges to see the patient again to assess the effect of the medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish supplementary guidance clarifying when confidential information may be disclosed in the public interest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Department of Health published supplementary guidance to the NHS Confidentiality Code of Practice (November 2010, Ref 13912) on disclosing confidential information when there is a public interest justification to do so and makes clear to healthcare professionals when it is appropriate to disclose personal information.”

Source location

2013-0287-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 5 November 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a consensus statement promoting information sharing to help prevent suicide, within the relevant law.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to confidentiality, there are clearly times when health care professionals, in dealing with a person at risk of suicide, may need to inform the family about aspects of risk to help keep the patient safe. I agree it is crucial that we address any confusion about how information can be shared. That is why the Department of Health is already working with Royal Colleges and professional organisations to agree a consensus statement designed to promote greater sharing of information with the aim of preventing suicide, within the context of the relevant law. We published this on 17 January at:”

Source location

2013-0287-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE clinical guidelines sufficiently address assessing immediate self-harm and suicide risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Taking your points in turn: guidance on risk assessment is included in clinical guidelines (CG133 Self-harm: longer-term management) produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), and issued in November 2011. It is worth quoting a relevant extract. The guidelines state:”

Source location

2013-0287-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing comprehensive prescribing guidance sufficiently addresses medication risks for people at risk of self-harm.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing comprehensive prescribing guidance sufficiently addresses medication risks for people at risk of self-harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, in relation to your suggestion of issuing guidance to doctors about prescribing medication to mental health patients that carries an increased risk of self-harm, there is currently comprehensive guidance on prescribing produced by a number of bodies including NICE, the General Medical Council and the British Medical Association. The guidance available specifically addresses how to assess the risk of prescribing a particular medication for individuals at risk of self-harm. Guidance often includes advice directed to patients and carers.”

Source location

2013-0287-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 5 November 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026