PFD report

Joshua Steven BROWN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 27 Apr 2015•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of compulsory practical in-car training for police driving at night-time
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Review police driver training, including risks associated with driving in reduced visibility and at night.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of compulsory practical in-car training for police driving at night-time

Wider context from the report

“Night-time driver training Consideration should be given to amending the national requirement for police driver training so as to include a compulsory element of practical in-car training for driving at night-time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review police driver training, including risks associated with driving in reduced visibility and at night.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College of Policing is currently working with the National Police Chiefs Council lead for roads policing, Chief Constable ████████ on the roads policing learning project. Within this project there is a specific piece of work on police driving standards which will involve a review of police driver training. Part of this work will examine the particular risks associated with driving in reduced visibility, including night-time driving.”

Source location

2015-0162-Response-by-College-of-Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 27 April 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Develop guidance addressing identified driving hazards.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2015.
  2. 2

    Examine the evidence base concerning driving hazards.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2015.
  3. 3

    Make the project results available as appropriate.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop guidance addressing identified driving hazards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The joint approach will involve an examination of the evidence base around driving hazards, the development of guidance, and, if it is determined to be the most effective way of addressing the risks identified, training. The exact timescales for completing the work are not known at this time but the results will be made available as appropriate.”

Source location

2015-0162-Response-by-College-of-Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 27 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine the evidence base concerning driving hazards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The joint approach will involve an examination of the evidence base around driving hazards, the development of guidance, and, if it is determined to be the most effective way of addressing the risks identified, training. The exact timescales for completing the work are not known at this time but the results will be made available as appropriate.”

Source location

2015-0162-Response-by-College-of-Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 27 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make the project results available as appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The joint approach will involve an examination of the evidence base around driving hazards, the development of guidance, and, if it is determined to be the most effective way of addressing the risks identified, training. The exact timescales for completing the work are not known at this time but the results will be made available as appropriate.”

Source location

2015-0162-Response-by-College-of-Policing
Page 1 · response
Published 27 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026