PFD report

Felix Burton HARTLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Aug 2024•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Variability in on-call Neonatology Consultant attendance times
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to regional neonatology specialist supportPart of recurring concern: Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Explore options for establishing a separate Neonatal Consultant on-call rota for the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  2. Action

    Approach the Integrated Care Board about externally reviewing current arrangements and options to strengthen Neonatal Consultant on-call provision for the Princess Royal Hospital service.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  3. Action

    Recommend against simultaneous out-of-hours cover of geographically separate neonatal sites and concurrent Tier 2 and Tier 3 cover by one consultant.

    Stated by British Association of Perinatal MedicineStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.7

  1. Position

    The Trust is asking the Integrated Care Board to externally review current arrangements and options for strengthening Neonatal Consultant on-call provision.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Variability in on-call Neonatology Consultant attendance times

Wider context from the report

“In this case, I heard that over the weekend and overnight Neonatology Consultants are not available immediately on site at either the Princess Royal Hospital, Haywards Heath or the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton. I heard that on-call Consultants over the weekend are on site at Brighton for some of the period but for the majority they are contactable by telephone in the first instance only. I heard that the Trust position is that this is not unusual in many settings as Consultants are not intended to be the first responders to emergency calls. At University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”), the on-call Consultant covers both the Princess Royal Hospital and the Royal Sussex County Hospital. These two sites are not close in proximity, and I heard that the traffic impacts on the time it would take for a Consultant to attend. The on-call Consultant does not always have access to an emergency vehicle and if called to attend either site would use their own vehicle and be subject to the usual road traffic laws. I heard that the Trust practice, as opposed to Policy, is that the on-call Consultant cannot be more than 30 minutes from either Brighton or Haywards Heath. The Trust facilitates accommodation at Brighton for the on-call Consultant so that they are within 30 minutes of Brighton if required. I was told that the arrangements for Neonatal care at the Princess Royal are in accordance with the British Association of Perinatal Medicine guidelines and that there is no national guidance as to the time that an on-call Neonatology Consultant should be expected to attend a hospital in the event of an emergency or as to whether multiple sites can be covered by one on-call Consultant. Whilst I did not find the timing of the attendance of the on-call Consultant causative or contributory in relation to Felix’s death, I am concerned that the time period in which attendance is made may vary and create a risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to regional neonatology specialist support; Unreliable consultant attendance when clinically required.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore options for establishing a separate Neonatal Consultant on-call rota for the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is aware that the current Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements for the Trevor Mann Baby Unit and the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit do not meet the current British Association of Perinatal Medicine standards, but our review of outcomes did not find evidence that the current arrangements we have in place are unsafe. However, it is acknowledged that it is right to review these arrangements. We are exploring the options for providing a separate Neonatal Consultant on-call rota for the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit, but we do not have existing Consultant resources to meet this need.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Approach the Integrated Care Board about externally reviewing current arrangements and options to strengthen Neonatal Consultant on-call provision for the Princess Royal Hospital service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trevor Mann Baby Unit Consultants are already fully committed clinically, and the workforce and financial resources are not currently available to fund the large Consultant expansion that would be needed to provide a freestanding Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit rota. Therefore, in view of the complexity and interdependency of the provision of maternity services, the Trust is approaching the Integrated Care Board (ICB) to consider externally reviewing the current arrangements and the options for strengthening our Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements for the Princess Royal Hospital Neonatal service.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommend against simultaneous out-of-hours cover of geographically separate neonatal sites and concurrent Tier 2 and Tier 3 cover by one consultant.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In our Service and Quality Standards for Provision of Neonatal Care in the UK (November 2022) [Page 24] we recommend;”

Source location

Response from British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish recommendations requiring immediate consultant availability, attendance within 30 minutes, and robustly job-planned and risk-assessed local coverage arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In a new document from November 2023 that was NOT in place at the time of this death, Consultant Working Patterns – A BAPM Report [page 5]”

Source location

Response from British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust is asking the Integrated Care Board to externally review current arrangements and options for strengthening Neonatal Consultant on-call provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trevor Mann Baby Unit Consultants are already fully committed clinically, and the workforce and financial resources are not currently available to fund the large Consultant expansion that would be needed to provide a freestanding Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit rota. Therefore, in view of the complexity and interdependency of the provision of maternity services, the Trust is approaching the Integrated Care Board (ICB) to consider externally reviewing the current arrangements and the options for strengthening our Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements for the Princess Royal Hospital Neonatal service.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Outcome reviews found no evidence that the current Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements at Princess Royal Hospital are unsafe or contribute to neonatal deaths.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Neonatal deaths are reviewed at a regional level and local data is benchmarked by MBRRACE. These reviews of neonatal deaths have not highlighted the availability of the Neonatal Consultant at the Princess Royal Hospital as a contributory factor to neonatal deaths.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust cannot currently provide a separate Princess Royal Hospital rota because Consultant, workforce and financial resources are unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is aware that the current Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements for the Trevor Mann Baby Unit and the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit do not meet the current British Association of Perinatal Medicine standards, but our review of outcomes did not find evidence that the current arrangements we have in place are unsafe. However, it is acknowledged that it is right to review these arrangements. We are exploring the options for providing a separate Neonatal Consultant on-call rota for the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit, but we do not have existing Consultant resources to meet this need.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 3 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Trusts determine their own out-of-hours neonatal consultant response-time policies under consultants’ terms and conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Trusts exercise their own policies for out of hours, on call response times. This is linked to the Terms and Conditions for all NHS Consultants. My colleagues in the South East have been asked to engage with University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and Sussex Health and Care Integrated Care Board on the concerns raised in your Report for assurance purposes. NHS England will also consider the Trust’s responses to your Report carefully in due course.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

BAPM guidance contains no recommendation specifying the time consultants must be on site.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The national terms and conditions for NHS consultants in England are set by NHS Employers and we have attached the latest version [Please see p18 and 40.] We have also attached A guide to Determining On-call Availability Supplements issued by the NHS Modernisation Agency (August 2004). There is no recommendation around the time required to be on site.”

Source location

Response from British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

BAPM is advisory rather than executive and therefore cannot direct trusts' local implementation processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BAPM is an advisory, not an executive body. We have made some relevant recommendations that can form the basis for local guidance. It is the responsibility of individual trusts to implement their own processes in line with national guidelines.”

Source location

Response from British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual trusts are responsible for implementing local processes in line with national guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“BAPM is an advisory, not an executive body. We have made some relevant recommendations that can form the basis for local guidance. It is the responsibility of individual trusts to implement their own processes in line with national guidelines.”

Source location

Response from British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Review the neonatal model of care in light of the prevention of future deaths report.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  2. 2

    Review neonatal clinical outcomes, including perinatal mortality and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy rates, for babies born at Princess Royal Hospital.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  3. 3

    Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share learning nationally and regionally.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  4. 4

    Consider the Trust’s response to the Prevention of Future Deaths Report.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 September 2024.
  5. 5

    Engage with University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and Sussex Health and Care Integrated Care Board about the reported concerns.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 2 September 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the neonatal model of care in light of the prevention of future deaths report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Regulation 28 Report has been reviewed by the Executive team and the Women and Children’s Division, including the Chief of Service, and the Neonatal Clinical Lead. In light of your report, our model of care has been reviewed. A review of neonatal clinical outcomes has also been carried out which includes our perinatal mortality rates and the incidence of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy for babies born at the Princess Royal Hospital.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review neonatal clinical outcomes, including perinatal mortality and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy rates, for babies born at Princess Royal Hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Regulation 28 Report has been reviewed by the Executive team and the Women and Children’s Division, including the Chief of Service, and the Neonatal Clinical Lead. In light of your report, our model of care has been reviewed. A review of neonatal clinical outcomes has also been carried out which includes our perinatal mortality rates and the incidence of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy for babies born at the Princess Royal Hospital.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Sussex
Page 1 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share learning nationally and regionally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Felix, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider the Trust’s response to the Prevention of Future Deaths Report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Trusts exercise their own policies for out of hours, on call response times. This is linked to the Terms and Conditions for all NHS Consultants. My colleagues in the South East have been asked to engage with University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and Sussex Health and Care Integrated Care Board on the concerns raised in your Report for assurance purposes. NHS England will also consider the Trust’s responses to your Report carefully in due course.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and Sussex Health and Care Integrated Care Board about the reported concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Trusts exercise their own policies for out of hours, on call response times. This is linked to the Terms and Conditions for all NHS Consultants. My colleagues in the South East have been asked to engage with University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and Sussex Health and Care Integrated Care Board on the concerns raised in your Report for assurance purposes. NHS England will also consider the Trust’s responses to your Report carefully in due course.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 2 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026