Raymond Barrie Thomas MILLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Apr 2025•Norfolk

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of a system for raising safety concerns with shipwreck owners
  2. Lack of a clear system for identifying shipwreck owners
  3. Lack of a safe system assigning responsibility for the management and safety of publicly accessible shipwrecks

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department for Transport

    The Department will not take further action because it no longer owns the wreck and has no legal responsibility for it.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. Department for Transport

    The Department cannot assist in establishing the wreck’s current ownership because it has no further information about subsequent title transfers.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system for raising safety concerns with shipwreck owners

Wider context from the report

“2. With no clear system to ensure that the owners can be identified, there is no system to ensure that concerns can be raised with them when safety concerns arise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear system for identifying shipwreck owners

Wider context from the report

“2. With no clear system to ensure that the owners can be identified, there is no system to ensure that concerns can be raised with them when safety concerns arise. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a safe system assigning responsibility for the management and safety of publicly accessible shipwrecks

Wider context from the report

“1. I am concerned that, in light of the above, there is no safe system in place to ensure that an organisation is responsible for the management and safety of such shipwrecks which are accessible by members of the public. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient on-site warnings about dangers at the shipwreck

Wider context from the report

“3. That that wreckage does not have sufficient warnings at the location to alert members of the public, particularly those who are not familiar with the tidal waters, of the dangers present at the wreck. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate warnings about location-specific hazards at public waterside locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Department will not take further action because it no longer owns the wreck and has no legal responsibility for it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department does not possess any further information that might assist in ascertaining whether title to the wreck was ever passed to anyone else or if a current owner exists. As the Department is no longer the owner of this wreck and has no legal responsibility pertaining to it, we are not proposing to take any further action on this occasion.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 25 April 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Department cannot assist in establishing the wreck’s current ownership because it has no further information about subsequent title transfers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department does not possess any further information that might assist in ascertaining whether title to the wreck was ever passed to anyone else or if a current owner exists. As the Department is no longer the owner of this wreck and has no legal responsibility pertaining to it, we are not proposing to take any further action on this occasion.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 25 April 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026