PFD report

Mollie Daisy DIMMOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Nov 2021•Buckinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a clear national definition of large-for-gestational-age babies
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate guidance for managing large babies in pregnancy and birthPart of recurring concern: Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    No further action is required because introducing a cutoff could convey inappropriate certainty or reassurance despite diagnostic uncertainty.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear national definition of large-for-gestational-age babies

Wider context from the report

“NICE Guidance NG121 last updated 25 April 2019 relates to intrapartum care for women with existing medical conditions or obstetric complications and their babies. Within this Guidance, whilst there is reference at paragraph 1.17 to guidance in respect mode of birth for large-for-gestational-age babies, there is no definition of a large-for-gestational-age baby in the Guidance. There does not appear to be any national guidance or accepted definition of large-for-gestational-age such that application of the Guidance is open to interpretation and variation depending upon an NHS Trust's own policies and guidance, and, in turn, the interpretation of obstetricians and other clinicians advising potential parents in anticipation of delivery modes. It is clear that NG121 is intended to provide guidance in relation to many potential scenarios which may impact upon care and mode of delivery decisions. The uncertainty surrounding when section 1.17 of the Guidance should be relevant arises through the lack of a definition of a large-for-gestational-age baby. Application of section 1.17 of the Guidance includes consideration of shoulder dystocia and options for continuing labour or caesarean section relevant to both the life of the mother and the baby. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate guidance for managing large babies in pregnancy and birth; Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No further action is required because introducing a cutoff could convey inappropriate certainty or reassurance despite diagnostic uncertainty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We believe that if the guideline were to provide a cut off it would be liable to convey inappropriate certainty, or reassurance if the cut off is not reached. As such, we do not believe that any action is required of NICE.”

Source location

2021-0379-Response-from-NICE_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026