PFD report

Alexander Philip MCCORMACK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Oct 2025•Northamptonshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delays in completing the transfer of missing persons case information between forces
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable transfer of cases between police forces
  2. Failure of the case-importing process to provide reliable guidance during competing high-risk priorities
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable missing-person response
  3. Lack of induction training for transferees from other forces on COMPACT case importing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide adequate and accessible staff inductionPart of recurring concern: Unreliable transfer of cases between police forces
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Conduct direct discussions with other forces about missing-person transfer requests and obtain the National Transfer Form to support decisions.

    Stated by Northamptonshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 31 October 2025.
  2. Action

    Make missing-person transfer decisions within two hours, sooner for high-risk cases.

    Stated by Northamptonshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 31 October 2025.
  3. Action

    Provide COMPACT transfer training to future transferee inspectors and refresher training to existing staff.

    Stated by Northamptonshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 31 October 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing transfer procedures, National Transfer Forms and Inspector oversight are relied upon to manage missing-person investigation transfers.

    Stated by Northamptonshire PoliceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing the transfer of missing persons case information between forces

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence that when transferring missing persons cases between forces, the transfer is accepted by completion of a signed transfer document. Assuming primacy of an investigation does not depend on the importing of a COMPACT file. However, the court also heard that until a transfer of information is complete, the receiving force may not be able to accurately assess the risk and fully take ownership of the investigation. This gives rise to a concern that this could lead to delay in formulating lines of inquiry. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable transfer of cases between police forces.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the case-importing process to provide reliable guidance during competing high-risk priorities

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence that whilst new recruits to the force, and those promoted internally, are trained on COMPACT and importing cases, this is not covered on the induction training for transferees from other forces at a particular rank. Guidance on how to transfer / import cases is available on the force intranet but this would need to be accessed and followed by the relevant officer at the time of importing the information; essentially leaning through experience. This gives rise to a concern as it could be during a busy night shift where a Reactive Inspector has competing high risk priorities. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable missing-person response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of induction training for transferees from other forces on COMPACT case importing

Wider context from the report

“The court heard evidence that whilst new recruits to the force, and those promoted internally, are trained on COMPACT and importing cases, this is not covered on the induction training for transferees from other forces at a particular rank. Guidance on how to transfer / import cases is available on the force intranet but this would need to be accessed and followed by the relevant officer at the time of importing the information; essentially leaning through experience. This gives rise to a concern as it could be during a busy night shift where a Reactive Inspector has competing high risk priorities. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide adequate and accessible staff induction; Unreliable transfer of cases between police forces.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct direct discussions with other forces about missing-person transfer requests and obtain the National Transfer Form to support decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The process involves both the National Requesting Enquiries/Transfer Form and direct communication between operational supervisors. This dual approach ensures transparency, accountability and timely decision making. Our Duty Response Inspectors actively engage in these conversations to avoid unnecessary delays and to prioritise the safety and wellbeing of those involved.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make missing-person transfer decisions within two hours, sooner for high-risk cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Decisions should be made within two hours”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide COMPACT transfer training to future transferee inspectors and refresher training to existing staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise the importance of equipping officers with the right knowledge and tools. While Inspectors currently hold responsibility for COMPACT transfers, we are enhancing training across all relevant ranks. Updated training packages are being developed to ensure consistency and confidence in handling these sensitive cases. This includes future transferee Inspectors and ongoing refresher sessions for existing staff.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop updated COMPACT transfer training packages for relevant ranks, including Cadre, control-room and detective inspectors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise the importance of equipping officers with the right knowledge and tools. While Inspectors currently hold responsibility for COMPACT transfers, we are enhancing training across all relevant ranks. Updated training packages are being developed to ensure consistency and confidence in handling these sensitive cases. This includes future transferee Inspectors and ongoing refresher sessions for existing staff.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 3 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing transfer procedures, National Transfer Forms and Inspector oversight are relied upon to manage missing-person investigation transfers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In Northamptonshire Police, our Duty Response Cadre Inspectors will have phone calls and discussions with other forces looking to transfer a missing person. There is then a reliance on the National Transfer Form (NTF) being sent to corroborate the information indicating that the missing person is most likely in the Northamptonshire area.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 2 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Acceptance of transfer primacy may be delayed when insufficient information is provided to assess risk accurately and take ownership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Once the National Transfer Form has been accepted and signed by the Inspector, that is when the missing case becomes the responsibility of the accepting force. It is no different to accepting a missing person from a member of the public, so as soon as we accept it, the investigation becomes our responsibility. We can commence actions based on information on the National Transfer Form.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The incident appears isolated rather than evidence of a systemic issue requiring wider remedial action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From my review, this appears to be an isolated incident rather than a systemic issue. Nevertheless, we remain committed to learning from every case and improving wherever possible. Please be”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Police
Page 4 · response
Published 31 October 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026