Glenn Barton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Aug 2022•Somerset

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of CT scan guidance to identify patients with non-anticoagulant blood-clotting conditions
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of head injury assessment and treatment pathways to reliably recognise and manage head injuries

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Make a research recommendation on the risks associated with a history of bleeding or clotting disorders.

  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Finalise the update of the head injury guideline, incorporating the updated review of serious-outcome risks for people with head injuries and coagulopathies.

  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Keep the risks associated with bleeding or clotting disorders under review to identify the need for further guidance updates.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Existing guidance requires assessing head-injury patients for any history of bleeding or clotting disorders.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Insufficient convincing evidence prevented adding bleeding or clotting disorders as a standalone indication for head CT.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of CT scan guidance to identify patients with non-anticoagulant blood-clotting conditions

Wider context from the report

“NICE Guidance (Head injury: assessment and early management published January 2014) states at para 1.4.12 that only patients who are on anticoagulant treatment should be offered/given a CT scan following a head injury with no other symptoms of concern (i.e. no loss of conscious, vomiting and no reduced CGS). It was clear from the evidence that there are other naturally occurring conditions, such as leukaemia, which can affect the ability of a patient’s blood to clot and so it would place such patients in the same potential risk category as those on anticoagulants, yet it is clear that a distinction is made. Consequently I am concerned that the guidance (that for the avoidance of doubt was followed during Glenn’s treatment) is ambiguous for such patients in terms of triage and treatment/investigatory pathway meaning that there may be missed opportunities to CT scan patients in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of head injury assessment and treatment pathways to reliably recognise and manage head injuries.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make a research recommendation on the risks associated with a history of bleeding or clotting disorders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As we develop guidance, we identify gaps and uncertainties in the evidence base which could benefit from further research. The most important unanswered questions are developed into research recommendations. The committee has made a research”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalise the update of the head injury guideline, incorporating the updated review of serious-outcome risks for people with head injuries and coagulopathies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently finalising an update of our guideline on head injury [CG176]. As part of this, we did update our review of the risks of serious outcomes in people with head injuries and a history of coagulopathies. The guideline committee did not find convincing evidence that this should be an indication for a head CT in the absence of other signs and symptoms, with the exception of someone taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets, so have not added this to recommendation 1.4.12.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep the risks associated with bleeding or clotting disorders under review to identify the need for further guidance updates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As we develop guidance, we identify gaps and uncertainties in the evidence base which could benefit from further research. The most important unanswered questions are developed into research recommendations. The committee has made a research”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing guidance requires assessing head-injury patients for any history of bleeding or clotting disorders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A history of bleeding or clotting disorders remains in recommendation 1.4.8 as a risk marker in people who have some loss of consciousness or amnesia.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient convincing evidence prevented adding bleeding or clotting disorders as a standalone indication for head CT.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently finalising an update of our guideline on head injury [CG176]. As part of this, we did update our review of the risks of serious outcomes in people with head injuries and a history of coagulopathies. The guideline committee did not find convincing evidence that this should be an indication for a head CT in the absence of other signs and symptoms, with the exception of someone taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelets, so have not added this to recommendation 1.4.12.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 10 March 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026