PFD report

Marta Elena Vento · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Mar 2025•Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
5

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
16

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of some mental healthcare trusts to accept referrals for homeless prisoners on release
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain healthcare continuity for prisoners after releasePart of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  2. Unavailability of National Record Locator access for South West ambulance care in Dorset
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of ambulance information systems to transfer safety-critical clinical and operational information
  3. Lack of guidance and tools for assessing violence risk in MOSOVO-managed offenders
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable MOSOVO management of sexual and violent offenders
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Reiterate the request for a full review of the Active Risk Management System process.

    Stated by National Police Chiefs’ CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Request a review of MOSOVO authorised professional practice and training materials to strengthen consideration of violence in risk assessments and management plans.

    Stated by National Police Chiefs’ CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  3. Action

    Consider developing national pathway guidance with adult mental health services for people leaving prison.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 March 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.7

  1. Position

    The established ARMS assessment and risk management process should identify serious violence risks when known to and properly assessed by the assessor.

    Stated by National Police Chiefs’ CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of some mental healthcare trusts to accept referrals for homeless prisoners on release

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was given that this is not the process nationally in that some mental healthcare trusts will not accept a referral if a person is homeless. There is no national guidance about the continuity of care for prisoners upon release from prison when homeless. I am concerned that this lack of continuity of care could lead to future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain healthcare continuity for prisoners after release; Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of National Record Locator access for South West ambulance care in Dorset

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was given by the Head of Clinical Development and Organisational Development at South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (SWAST) that in the South West region all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), apart from the ICB in Dorset, NHS Dorset, are at some stage of implementing the use of NRL so that SWAST can access this information to assist in the provision of care to those they treat. Evidence was given that as this would limit the information SWAST had access to about a patient in Dorset, this would impact upon the care provided to those in Dorset by SWAST which could lead to a future death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of ambulance information systems to transfer safety-critical clinical and operational information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance and tools for assessing violence risk in MOSOVO-managed offenders

Wider context from the report

“The risk assessments detailed in the guidance are aimed at the assessment of the sexual risk of offenders and evidence was given that there is no bespoke risk assessment tool or guidance to assess the violence of such offenders to assist staff within MOSOVO units to undertake their role. There is, therefore, a lack of guidance on how to risk assess and manage offenders who are managed under MOSOVO when they present with the risk of violence, or an escalating risk of violence. I am concerned that this will result in a failure to identify the risk of violence, or the increasing risk of violence, in those being managed by MOSOVO which may lead to a further death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable MOSOVO management of sexual and violent offenders.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a process for sharing remanded prisoners’ risk information with sentencing courts

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was given by the Head of the Offender Management Unit (OMU) at HMP Winchester, a Senior Probation Officer, that there is currently no formal process or guidance in place for the sharing of information by a prison with the Criminal Courts to provide an update of the person's behaviour in prison which may increase their risk of harm or risk offending. It was explained that the person who could enquire about this at Court, if asked, would be the duty Probation Officer, and that this is especially more challenging to complete when a fast delivery report is requested. There is currently no process from a prison perspective to share information to the sentencing Court other than that contained within the Prison Escort Record (PER), which is not provided to the sentencing Judge, the lawyers at Court or Probation staff. I am concerned that the full extent of a remanded prisoner’s risk of harm to the public may not be appreciated by the sentencing Judge, which could impact upon the sentence imposed upon a prisoner and I am concerned that this lack of sharing of information could lead to future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide criminal courts with relevant vulnerability and risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of practical national guidance for continuity of prisoners’ healthcare on release

Wider context from the report

“There is a lack of national guidance to assist all healthcare providers to ensure continuity of care for a prisoner with health care needs, whether physical or mental health needs, upon release from prison. There are national standards of care and NICE guidelines in place, however none of these provide practical guidance around the delivery of care to ensure continuity of care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain healthcare continuity for prisoners after release.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reiterate the request for a full review of the Active Risk Management System process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NPCC MOSOVO Lead liaises regularly with the College of Policing who develop the training for MOSOVO staff in England and Wales and who produce Authorised Professional Practice. I will ask that the NPCC Lead request the College of Policing review their APP and training material to highlight more strongly the consideration of violence within the assessment when considering the formulation of the risk management plan. In addition, we have previously requested from the College of Policing a full review of the ARMS process as part of normal good practice and will reiterate this need.”

Source location

Response from NPCC
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request a review of MOSOVO authorised professional practice and training materials to strengthen consideration of violence in risk assessments and management plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NPCC MOSOVO Lead liaises regularly with the College of Policing who develop the training for MOSOVO staff in England and Wales and who produce Authorised Professional Practice. I will ask that the NPCC Lead request the College of Policing review their APP and training material to highlight more strongly the consideration of violence within the assessment when considering the formulation of the risk management plan. In addition, we have previously requested from the College of Policing a full review of the ARMS process as part of normal good practice and will reiterate this need.”

Source location

Response from NPCC
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider developing national pathway guidance with adult mental health services for people leaving prison.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At present, there is no specific national pathway guidance setting out what an individual on release can expect from their local Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). The guidance relating to the Adult Mental Health Team is generic rather than focused on the prison population.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and refresh the prison mental health service specification, using case learning to strengthen continuity and transfer of care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there are no plans currently to develop national pathway guidance, NHS England will be considering this in the longer-term, working with the Adult Mental Health Team to ensure services are able to fully support those leaving prison.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide RECONNECT care-after-custody support and release planning to improve continuity of care for people leaving prison.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support this approach when individuals are leaving prison, there are services in place such as RECONNECT, a non-clinical ‘care after custody’ service that seeks to improve the continuity of care of individuals with identified health needs, by working with them before they leave the secure estate. RECONNECT supports transition to community-based services, enabling the safeguarding of health gains made whilst in the secure estate, with the aim of helping to reduce inequalities and address health-related drivers of offending behaviours.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask the HMPPS Safety Group to consider court risk-information sharing during its forthcoming Prison Safety Policy Framework review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“of sharing with courts information about behaviour in custody that may impact on risk of harm or offending. In response to the concerns that you have raised, I have asked the Safety Group in HMPPS to give further consideration to this specific area when they undertake a review of this policy framework later in the 2026-26 business year. This will be informed by the results of the pathfinder projects described above.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate immediate-release pathfinders in three prisons to develop multi-agency identification, support, management and information-exchange approaches.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The National Immediate Release Task and Finish Group has established immediate release pathfinders in three prisons, with a focus on developing multi-agency approaches to identify in advance those people who may be immediately released from court and to take steps to ensure that they are supported and managed effectively. This includes exploring methods of information exchange for those on remand who have an upcoming court case which may result in immediate release.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with Dorset Constabulary to ensure awareness of current MOSOVO guidance and available material for managing violent-offender risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A number of actuarial tools are cited within the APP, along with more generic risk assessment factors, and the importance of professional judgement is outlined. However, it would be remiss of us not to further explore the specific application of a risk assessment tool. I have asked my Policing Standards Manager, ████████ to consult further with the NPCC Lead for MOSOVO and relevant subject matter experts to see where we can further improve our guidance and direction. Similarly, I shall also ask Sharon to liaise with Dorset Constabulary, to ensure that they are fully sighted on the current guidance and available material, to better address the risks posed by violent offenders in a MOSOVO setting.”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult the NPCC MOSOVO lead and relevant subject-matter experts on improving guidance for assessing violence risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A number of actuarial tools are cited within the APP, along with more generic risk assessment factors, and the importance of professional judgement is outlined. However, it would be remiss of us not to further explore the specific application of a risk assessment tool. I have asked my Policing Standards Manager, ████████ to consult further with the NPCC Lead for MOSOVO and relevant subject matter experts to see where we can further improve our guidance and direction. Similarly, I shall also ask Sharon to liaise with Dorset Constabulary, to ensure that they are fully sighted on the current guidance and available material, to better address the risks posed by violent offenders in a MOSOVO setting.”

Source location

Response from College of Policing
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish Dorset Care Record capability to share information through the National Record Locator and begin sharing records with other services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Meanwhile in the absence of this capability DCR is looking to have the technical capability to share information with others using NRL from March 2026 onwards. Currently our system supplier has not been able to deliver this capability. Importantly, this will meet the national deadline set by NHS England, which is important because the benefit of using a single system to share is enjoyed when all parties are consistent. Shortly after this, DCR will then start sharing records to others using NRL, which will mean that SWASFT can access the data through this method.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue participating in regional and national work to adopt National Record Locator information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Dorset and the Dorset Care Record (DCR) Partnership are involved in the regional and national work to adopt sharing information via the National Recorder Locator and were in fact founding members of the One South West Programme. This is a complex area and although a number of ICSs in the South-West are making progress, there is much work to be done. The issue is not as simple as suggested, and the current focus of the work across the One South West programme is supporting ambulance crews to access care plans supporting patients with frailty and palliative care. The One South West programme would need to expand their activity significantly to also support the sharing of mental health care plans. We would actively support the expansion of this work.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with Dorset Healthcare to transfer its information into the Dorset Care Record during 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The DCR partnership is continuing to work with Dorset Healthcare to share their information to DCR in 2025, another critical part of the solution. This has been highlighted as an urgent area of focus for the Dorset Healthcare team.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The established ARMS assessment and risk management process should identify serious violence risks when known to and properly assessed by the assessor.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The risk assessment process police use for sexual offenders is the Active Risk Management System (ARMS), which has been in use by Police in England and Wales since 2014 and is well established. This system assesses 11 factors both risk and protective bespoke to the offenders personal circumstances at the time of assessment alongside their static risk of sexual recidivism based on the OASys Sexual Predictor (OSP). These are combined to provide an overall level of risk and most importantly a risk management plan articulating the plan to mitigate the risks identified and to support the offenders desistance. We would expect that this activity should look at the offenders circumstances holistically and should identify risks of serious violence as part of the overall assessment if known to the assessor and if undertaken adequately.”

Source location

Response from NPCC
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There are currently no plans to develop specific national pathway guidance for people leaving prison, although this may be considered longer-term.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At present, there is no specific national pathway guidance setting out what an individual on release can expect from their local Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). The guidance relating to the Adult Mental Health Team is generic rather than focused on the prison population.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The system supplier has not delivered the technical capability needed to share Dorset Care Record information through the National Record Locator.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Meanwhile in the absence of this capability DCR is looking to have the technical capability to share information with others using NRL from March 2026 onwards. Currently our system supplier has not been able to deliver this capability. Importantly, this will meet the national deadline set by NHS England, which is important because the benefit of using a single system to share is enjoyed when all parties are consistent. Shortly after this, DCR will then start sharing records to others using NRL, which will mean that SWASFT can access the data through this method.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Solutions to information visibility across system partners lie with multiple organisations rather than solely within the Integrated Care Board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, it is recognised that this is not the first Prevention of Future Deaths notice that has been issued where the lack of visibility/accessibility of important information across system partners has been raised. The solutions to this lie across different partner organisations and not within the ICB. In order to ensure that there is active scrutiny of this area and to ensure that progress is being made a risk has been opened on the system risk register where all system partners have a role in ensuring active mitigation of any ongoing risk.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The allegations about NHS Dorset’s involvement in National Record Locator work are not factually accurate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to point out that some of the allegations made are not factually accurate regarding the involvement of Dorset ICB in addressing the issues of connection to the National Record Locator.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dorset Healthcare must share mental health care plans, while SWASFT must improve ambulance-crew uptake of its existing information-sharing system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although this technical capability is essential, there are other critical requirements, including that Dorset Healthcare NHS Trust shares the mental health care plans (and other data), and that SWASFT themselves make sure that their existing system has a significantly improved uptake by their ambulance crews.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

SWASFT’s prioritisation of the National Record Locator approach has delayed delivery of direct Dorset Care Record access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS Dorset remain keen to work with SWASFT to enable access to Dorset Care Record directly, which is a possibility today, meaning that SWASFT personnel could access all the information held on our ICS shared care record (DCR). However, SWASFT have prioritised the NRL approach to sharing data, meaning that the delivery is pushed back.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Support sharing learning and next steps from the multi-agency learning event through the Serious Case Review Subgroup.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  2. 2

    Require Integrated Care Boards to review community mental health services supporting people with serious mental illness and challenging engagement.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  3. 3

    Table and discuss the report’s findings and learning at NHS England Health and Justice oversight and related national meetings.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 March 2025.
  4. 4

    Maintain an active system risk-register entry to scrutinise information-access risks and coordinate partner mitigation.

    Stated by NHS Dorset Integrated Care BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 March 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support sharing learning and next steps from the multi-agency learning event through the Serious Case Review Subgroup.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the learning event, consideration was given to how an individual is assessed for their mental health needs when entering and leaving prison, how ongoing mental health and social care needs are shared with colleagues in health and local authority services, alongside the public protection responsibilities under the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA), in assessing and managing the risks posed by the most serious offenders. Common themes identified were:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require Integrated Care Boards to review community mental health services supporting people with serious mental illness and challenging engagement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of the 2024/25 NHS Priorities and Operational Planning Guidance, NHS England required all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), the organisations with responsibility for commissioning (paying for) local mental health services, to complete a review of their community mental health services by the end of September (Quarter 2) 2024/25.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Table and discuss the report’s findings and learning at NHS England Health and Justice oversight and related national meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nationally, the findings, information and any learning from this Report will be tabled at a future NHS England Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group (HJDO G). The HJDOG is the senior leadership forum, which holds responsibility for the oversight of delivery and continuous improvement in Health and Justice commissioned services, through both national and regional teams. All health and justice related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths are shared and discussed at the HJDOG, and assurance is sought from regions where learning and action is identified. This case will also be tabled and discussed at the NHS England Health and Justice and Sexual Assault Referral Centres (HJ&SARCs) meeting scheduled for 13 May 2025, where the learning and any improvements will be shared. These meetings are attended by Health and Justice Quality leads and representatives.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 4 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain an active system risk-register entry to scrutinise information-access risks and coordinate partner mitigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, it is recognised that this is not the first Prevention of Future Deaths notice that has been issued where the lack of visibility/accessibility of important information across system partners has been raised. The solutions to this lie across different partner organisations and not within the ICB. In order to ensure that there is active scrutiny of this area and to ensure that progress is being made a risk has been opened on the system risk register where all system partners have a role in ensuring active mitigation of any ongoing risk.”

Source location

Response from NHS Dorset ICB
Page 2 · response
Published 11 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
5/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026