PFD report

Jamie Staley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Nov 2019•Gwent

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of signage to alert pedestrians to the A40 and prevent entry onto the slip road
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Continue working with SWTRA to identify additional safety measures for the junction.

    Stated by Monmouthshire County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 January 2020.
  2. Action

    Complete installation of pedestrian prohibition signs on the existing signing infrastructure.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 January 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Responsibility for the A40 lies with the Welsh Government and South Wales Trunk Road Agency.

    Stated by Monmouthshire County CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of signage to alert pedestrians to the A40 and prevent entry onto the slip road

Wider context from the report

“The inquest determined that Jamie died after he accessed the A40 from Monmouth Town, near the Gibraltar tunnels. In considering Jamie’s movements on the night he died, the inquest determined that Jamie’s mistake had been caused by a combination of not knowing the area and being under the influence of alcohol, however access generally to the A40 in the area of was considered. Police Constable 217████████ gave evidence to the inquest and presented the findings of the Collision Investigation Report. He indicated that there is relatively easy access onto the A40 in this area and was surprised that there were no signs which could alert pedestrians to the A40, or to prevent them from entering onto the slip road. Although lack of signage did not contribute to Jamie’s death I consider that this is a matter for consideration in preventing pedestrians from straying inadvertently onto this busy road in future. The junction in question is the exit from the A40 travelling northbound immediately having travelled through the Gibraltar tunnels onto the B4233. The co-ordinates are 51.805620, -2.716463. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with SWTRA to identify additional safety measures for the junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the report identifies that signage did not contribute to the accident we will continue to work with SWTRA to identify any additional measures that may improve safety on this junction.”

Source location

2019-0463-Response-from-Monmouthshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 16 January 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete installation of pedestrian prohibition signs on the existing signing infrastructure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further to our letter of 10 February, I can confirm that our South Wales Trunk Road Agent (SWTRA) has now completed the installation of Pedestrian Prohibition signs on the existing signing infrastructure.”

Source location

2019-0463-Response-from-Monmouthshire-County-Council-update_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 16 January 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for the A40 lies with the Welsh Government and South Wales Trunk Road Agency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The A40 is the responsibility of Welsh Government and South Wales Trunk Road Agency (SWTRA). I have copied SWTRA colleagues into this response should they wish to add any further comments.”

Source location

2019-0463-Response-from-Monmouthshire-County-Council-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 16 January 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026