PFD report

Shahida Begum · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jun 2019•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to make patient destination decisions using clinical observations before streamer assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Require vital signs to be recorded and available to streamers before streaming decisions are made.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  2. Action

    Provide ongoing training to streamers on recognising abnormal observations when assessing urgent treatment centre suitability.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make patient destination decisions using clinical observations before streamer assessment

Wider context from the report

“The current system in place at Newham University Hospital is that a clinical streamer will make a decision about the destination of the patient (GP clinic; urgent treatment centre or A&E), before clinical observations are taken by the triage nurse. The decision is based upon an “eyeballing” check of the patient and a brief history from the patient. It was considered by myself, (as Coroner), by an independent emergency medicine expert and a senior doctor from Newham University Hospital that a safer system would be for the streamer to have the clinical observations available to them before they see the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require vital signs to be recorded and available to streamers before streaming decisions are made.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since this incident we have changed our procedures so that the vital sign records are taken and made available to the streamer before the streaming decision is made. We have also provided additional training for streamers and will continue to do this on an ongoing basis to ensure streamers are aware of the importance of abnormal clinical observations when assessing the suitability of patients for assessment in the urgent treatment centre.”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide ongoing training to streamers on recognising abnormal observations when assessing urgent treatment centre suitability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since this incident we have changed our procedures so that the vital sign records are taken and made available to the streamer before the streaming decision is made. We have also provided additional training for streamers and will continue to do this on an ongoing basis to ensure streamers are aware of the importance of abnormal clinical observations when assessing the suitability of patients for assessment in the urgent treatment centre.”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Audit streamed patients’ sepsis screening to check compliance with screening guidelines.

    Stated by Newham GP Co-operative LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  2. 2

    Give patients discharged with infective illnesses the Sepsis Trust patient information leaflet.

    Stated by Newham GP Co-operative LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  3. 3

    Require reception and clinical staff to complete annual sepsis training.

    Stated by Newham GP Co-operative LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  4. 4

    Alert staff that NEWS scores above 2 require further investigation and monitoring.

    Stated by Newham GP Co-operative LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  5. 5

    Place Sepsis Trust triage tools in every consulting room.

    Stated by Newham GP Co-operative LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit streamed patients’ sepsis screening to check compliance with screening guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An audit was undertaken for 20 streamed patients to review appropriate Sepsis screening and guidelines were being followed.”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Give patients discharged with infective illnesses the Sepsis Trust patient information leaflet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All patients discharged home with an infective illness from Newham GP Co-operative are given the Sepsis Trust Patient Information Leaflet (copy attached)”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require reception and clinical staff to complete annual sepsis training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All reception and clinical staff at Newham GP Co Operative are required to do annual Sepsis training (since Aug 2018)”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Alert staff that NEWS scores above 2 require further investigation and monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. All staff including GP streamers, healthcare Assistants and GP’s working within the Newham GP Co-Operative are alerted to a fact”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Place Sepsis Trust triage tools in every consulting room.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Each consulting room in Newham GP Co-Operative has a laminated copy of the Sepsis Trust Triage Tool”

Source location

2019-0199-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026