PFD report

Alan Derek Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Oct 2014•Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Protruding road studs creating a motorcycle loss-of-control hazard
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of vehicle loss-of-control risks on hazardous road sections
  2. Inadequate road markings permitting overtaking on a road with a side entrance and obscured visibility
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safetyPart of recurring concern: Unsafe overtaking controls on hazardous road sections
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Protruding road studs creating a motorcycle loss-of-control hazard

Wider context from the report

“(2) The evidence suggested that one of the most likely causes of the deceased losing control of his motorcycle was contact with a protruding cats eye. This was agreed by the senior investigation officer and the collision investigation officer who both held the view that this may have contributed to the accident. Consideration in my view ought to be given to replacing the “old style cats eyes” with the newer “slim line” version to minimise this risk in the future should it not be considered appropriate to make the area subject to double white lines to prohibit overtaking. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of vehicle loss-of-control risks on hazardous road sections.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate road markings permitting overtaking on a road with a side entrance and obscured visibility

Wider context from the report

“(1) The road at this particular location is governed by a single broken white line indicating that overtaking is permitted. Given the layout of the road, the existence of a side entrance to it, the impact of hedges obscuring the view of the road consideration, in my opinion, ought to be given to putting double white line markings on this particular stretch of road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety; Unsafe overtaking controls on hazardous road sections.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.