PFD report

Tyla Katherine Joan COOK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Sep 2019•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
17

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to organise a multi-disciplinary learning event on emergency non-technical skills
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff training for emergency response
  2. Failure to maintain up-to-date written care and crisis plans
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable care-planning processes
  3. Delays in Eating Disorder Service assessment due to caseload capacity
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient specialist support for eating-disorder patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Provide interim and updated written care and crisis plans, including emergency contacts and safety plans after unplanned discharge, with reviews within seven and 28 days.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  2. Action

    Roll out staff training in care planning and crisis or safety planning to embed the revised care-planning processes.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  3. Action

    Attend a fixed multi-agency meeting with partner organisations to plan the recommended non-technical-skills learning event.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    West Norfolk CCG will lead organising and facilitating the multi-disciplinary learning event, with other participants providing support and contributions.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to organise a multi-disciplinary learning event on emergency non-technical skills

Wider context from the report

“3. The Review carried out by the West Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group in May 2019 recommended a multi-disciplinary learning event involving participants from Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Norfolk County Council and East of England Ambulance Service Trust be developed and implemented to train staff on how to apply good non-technical skills (teamwork, leadership, task prioritisation and communication) when responding to an emergency. At the inquest it became clear no steps have been taken to organise this event and there is confusion as to who is responsible for arranging this learning event. The Care providers indicated it was the West Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group. The West Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group do not appear to accept responsibility for organisation of the event. Tyla died on 15 November 2017. The West Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group Review was published 8 May 2019. No steps have been taken with regard to this learning event, save East of England Ambulance Service Trust has been in contact with the West Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group. There is concern that a multi-disciplinary learning event will not be organised and will not take place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff training for emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain up-to-date written care and crisis plans

Wider context from the report

“2. There was no written up-to-date care and crisis plans in place. The most recent written care plan related to Tyla being an inpatient at the Dragonfly Unit, from where he was discharged on 9 August 2017. The written plans were therefore several months out of date. This is against Trust Policy. Evidence was heard that at a CETR meeting on 6 November 2017 a period of a further 3 months was requested to prepare an up to date written care plan. In the event, and despite the family’s repeated requests for plans in writing, it was decided the care plan could be commenced by 30 November 2017, on the basis Tyla’s input into the Care Plan was important and it would take time to gain his meaningful input. The evidence was that there were oral plans in place which were relayed to the parents (including at times of distress), who continued to request plans in writing. The high level of distress and anxiety within Tyla’s home was recognised. An interim written plan was not considered nor that a written plan may have helped the family in providing support to Tyla. Steps have been taken by the Trust to recognise when up to date written plans are not in place and it is understood staff have undergone some work in improving the quality of care plans. However in this case an active decision was made not to update the written plan for some time. Further the evidence did not reveal any insight into the support a written plan could have given the family to support Tyla. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in Eating Disorder Service assessment due to caseload capacity

Wider context from the report

“1. It was agreed at the CETR meeting on 9 August 2017 that Tyla was to be seen by the Eating Disorder Service. He was not seen until 25 October 2017. The evidence was the 11 week delay in seeing Tyla was due to a heavy caseload and the practitioner having to remove other cases from his caseload before he was able to work with Tyla; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient specialist support for eating-disorder patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide interim and updated written care and crisis plans, including emergency contacts and safety plans after unplanned discharge, with reviews within seven and 28 days.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Trust response to concern 2: NSFT recognises the importance of care plans for all service users and that these need to be done in collaboration with the service user and their families / carers if possible. However, in some circumstances this can take time in which case an interim care plan will be put in place whilst a more comprehensive and collaborative plan is being developed.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out staff training in care planning and crisis or safety planning to embed the revised care-planning processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A programme of training being rolled out offers training in care planning and crisis or safety planning with all staff which will ensure the above changes are embedded within teams.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Attend a fixed multi-agency meeting with partner organisations to plan the recommended non-technical-skills learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Trust response to concern 3: There is a multi-agency meeting fixed for the 4th November which our Head of Patient Safety, Saranna Burgess, will attend with representatives from all the other organisations involved to plan this.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement cross-team joint working, risk-prioritised access, escalation of capacity concerns, and coordinated reviews for service users with complex co-morbid conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Trust response to concern 1: In order to prevent delays accessing care when a service user presents with complex co-morbid mental health conditions the following process has been developed.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the multidisciplinary meeting planning the learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am pleased to be able to advise you that on 4th November a meeting was held at Chatterton House in King’s Lynn and present were senior staff from all of the key participants, namely the Director of Nursing and Quality Assurance - West Norfolk CCG (Chair), the Deputy Director for Patient Safety and Quality - Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, the Interim General Manager - East of England Ambulance NHS Trust, the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Team Manager - Norfolk County Council, and the Deputy Director of Patient Safety from this Trust. Other support staff were in attendance. One of the main agenda items was for the learning event to be arranged and it was decided that a date would be selected in February 2020 and that the West Norfolk CCG would take the lead in organising the venue and facilitating the event with support and contribution from the other participants.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-The-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support and contribute to the multidisciplinary learning event scheduled for February 2020.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am pleased to be able to advise you that on 4th November a meeting was held at Chatterton House in King’s Lynn and present were senior staff from all of the key participants, namely the Director of Nursing and Quality Assurance - West Norfolk CCG (Chair), the Deputy Director for Patient Safety and Quality - Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, the Interim General Manager - East of England Ambulance NHS Trust, the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Team Manager - Norfolk County Council, and the Deputy Director of Patient Safety from this Trust. Other support staff were in attendance. One of the main agenda items was for the learning event to be arranged and it was decided that a date would be selected in February 2020 and that the West Norfolk CCG would take the lead in organising the venue and facilitating the event with support and contribution from the other participants.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-The-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange the multidisciplinary learning event for mid-February 2020.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions (with provisional timescales to be confirmed by the group members) agreed at the task and finish group meeting are ongoing and include:”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 5 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop learning-event materials covering the incident, organisational changes, staff messages and relevant lessons learned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The materials to be developed for the learning event are to include a pen portrait of Tyla (his parents are to be invited to share their views on this), changes made by NSFT and QEH in light of the incident and key messages from the staff involved in the incident. Information regarding the relevant Lessons Learnt will also be included e.g. Lesson Learnt 12 - Monitoring of acute physical health deterioration.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 6 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange and chair a multidisciplinary task-and-finish group meeting to develop the learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Arranged for the task and finish group (with attending representatives from NSFT, EEAST, QEH, NCC and West Norfolk CCG) to meet on 04 November 2019 to discuss the development of the learning event. Action completed 04 November 2019.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 5 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Invite senior operational staff from NNUH and James Paget University Hospitals to disseminate incident and investigation learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• As part of the sharing and dissemination of the outcomes of this incident and the Investigation report, the invitees to the learning event are to include senior operational staff from the Emergency Department at Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (NNUH) and James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 6 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identify and secure an external facilitator for the proposed learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• An External facilitator for the learning event has been identified by West Norfolk CCG and is available for the proposed date of the learning event.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 6 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request QEH’s Risk and Safety team to compile investigation learning for consideration by the task-and-finish group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Requested QEH (Risk and Safety team) to draw together the learning from the Investigation Report for consideration by the task and finish group (in line with Action 1 of Recommendation 2). Action completed 01 November 2019.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 5 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

West Norfolk CCG will lead organising and facilitating the multi-disciplinary learning event, with other participants providing support and contributions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am pleased to be able to advise you that on 4th November a meeting was held at Chatterton House in King’s Lynn and present were senior staff from all of the key participants, namely the Director of Nursing and Quality Assurance - West Norfolk CCG (Chair), the Deputy Director for Patient Safety and Quality - Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, the Interim General Manager - East of England Ambulance NHS Trust, the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) Team Manager - Norfolk County Council, and the Deputy Director of Patient Safety from this Trust. Other support staff were in attendance. One of the main agenda items was for the learning event to be arranged and it was decided that a date would be selected in February 2020 and that the West Norfolk CCG would take the lead in organising the venue and facilitating the event with support and contribution from the other participants.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-The-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

QEH and its Deputy Director of Patient Safety are the organisational and individual leads for Recommendation 2 and the learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Recommendation 2 clearly states that firstly, the task and finish group is responsible for the implementation of the recommendation (i.e. is the ‘action owner’). Secondly, that QEH and its Deputy Director of Patient Safety are the organisational and individual leads respectively for this recommendation.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 3 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The CCG did not agree to lead or take over responsibility for Recommendation 2 or the learning event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Accordingly there was no agreement by the CCG at that time or subsequently that the CCG would take the lead on any training event or Recommendation 2.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 4 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The review’s learning themes are already being addressed through existing work and approaches for working with children and families.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although these are recommendations from this particular review, they are all areas of work that are currently underway and being adopted in our approach to working with children and families.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Most specific recommendations concern health partners, which will provide the Coroner with a joint response on matters pertinent to them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The majority of the specific points made in your report relate to actions to be taken by our health partners. We have been in liaison with health colleagues on these matters and the various health partnerships will be providing you with their joint response to the recommendations pertinent to them.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Implement robust governance arrangements for tracking QEH responses to prescribed deadlines and escalating missed deadlines.

    Stated by NHS Norfolk and Suffolk Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  2. 2

    Contact QEH to implement governance arrangements for documenting and circulating outcomes and actions from less formal meetings.

    Stated by NHS Norfolk and Suffolk Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  3. 3

    Adopt the review’s five learning themes in the approach to working with children and families.

    Stated by Norfolk County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  4. 4

    Send the published final Serious Case Review report to the coroner’s office.

    Stated by Norfolk County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2019.
  5. 5

    Ensure robust governance of safeguarding practice review arrangements through Children’s Services representation on the Safeguarding Practice Review Group.

    Stated by Norfolk County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement robust governance arrangements for tracking QEH responses to prescribed deadlines and escalating missed deadlines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The CCG will implement more robust governance arrangements for tracking QEH’s responses to prescribed deadlines and action where these have not been met.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 5 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contact QEH to implement governance arrangements for documenting and circulating outcomes and actions from less formal meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The CCG will contact QEH as regards the implementation of agreed governance arrangements for the management of less formal meetings.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-West-Norfolk-CCG
Page 5 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adopt the review’s five learning themes in the approach to working with children and families.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are five overarching learning themes from the review. They relate to better adolescent care pathways, to embed an environment where the fundamental issues in relation to contextual safeguarding are better understood, for a holistic family approach to be better understood and for courageous conversations to take place throughout and across organisations. In essence a whole system approach to working with children, young people and their families.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send the published final Serious Case Review report to the coroner’s office.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The final draft report, with findings and recommendations will be signed off today, 11 November 2019 at the Safeguarding Practice Review Group. Children’s Services have a Service Director and a Senior Officer as members of this group and ensure the governance arrangements are robustly upheld and implemented. Once the final report is published we will ensure that a copy is also sent to your office.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure robust governance of safeguarding practice review arrangements through Children’s Services representation on the Safeguarding Practice Review Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The final draft report, with findings and recommendations will be signed off today, 11 November 2019 at the Safeguarding Practice Review Group. Children’s Services have a Service Director and a Senior Officer as members of this group and ensure the governance arrangements are robustly upheld and implemented. Once the final report is published we will ensure that a copy is also sent to your office.”

Source location

2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-County-Council_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026