Robert Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Mar 2016•South London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised3

  1. Tree trunk near the carriageway edge presenting a danger to road users
    Part of recurring concern: Uncontrolled roadside obstacles endangering road users
  2. Lack of sufficient deviation markings at the bend
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
  3. Path surface capable of causing walkers to slip into the carriageway
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Tree trunk near the carriageway edge presenting a danger to road users

Wider context from the report

“(1) The bend lacks sufficient deviation markings (2) There is a tree trunk near the edge of the carriageway that presents a danger to road users particularly cyclists (3) A path that approaches the road and is well used by walkers has a surface that could cause walkers to slip into the carriageway. (The matters of concern are summarised in the report of ████████ from Catford Traffic Police. An extract from his report is attached. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Uncontrolled roadside obstacles endangering road users.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sufficient deviation markings at the bend

Wider context from the report

“(1) The bend lacks sufficient deviation markings (2) There is a tree trunk near the edge of the carriageway that presents a danger to road users particularly cyclists (3) A path that approaches the road and is well used by walkers has a surface that could cause walkers to slip into the carriageway. (The matters of concern are summarised in the report of ████████ from Catford Traffic Police. An extract from his report is attached. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Path surface capable of causing walkers to slip into the carriageway

Wider context from the report

“(1) The bend lacks sufficient deviation markings (2) There is a tree trunk near the edge of the carriageway that presents a danger to road users particularly cyclists (3) A path that approaches the road and is well used by walkers has a surface that could cause walkers to slip into the carriageway. (The matters of concern are summarised in the report of ████████ from Catford Traffic Police. An extract from his report is attached. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026