PFD report

Leslie Horsfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Jun 2021•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of prompts in admissions assessment tools to ask about previous choking episodes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Update the nursing admission proforma to ask whether patients have previously experienced choking episodes during the EPR rollout.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 June 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing swallowing questions are considered adequate to manage choking risk despite lacking a specific question about previous choking episodes.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of prompts in admissions assessment tools to ask about previous choking episodes

Wider context from the report

“The absence of any prompt in the admissions assessment tool which reminds assessors to ask patients about previous choking episodes creates a risk that relevant information is missed from the assessment and places the onus on the patient to volunteer information which they may not appreciate is relevant to the assessment ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the nursing admission proforma to ask whether patients have previously experienced choking episodes during the EPR rollout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having considered the matter further, I would like to provide you with assurance that as part of our Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Programme roll-out across the North East Sector, the nursing admission proforma will be updated to ask whether the patient has previously experienced any choking episodes. The timeframe for implementation of EPR across Pennine is Spring 2023.”

Source location

2021-0215-Response-from-Northern-Care-Alliance_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing swallowing questions are considered adequate to manage choking risk despite lacking a specific question about previous choking episodes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having discussed this with senior nursing colleagues within the Trust, it is however maintained that the nursing admission proforma provides the assessor with the ability to adequately explore a patient’s swallowing capability. Whilst the nursing assessment does not ask a specific question in relation to previous episodes of choking, the assessment does clearly question patients in relation to any problems with eating and drinking, the need for modified dietary consistency, or anything else to prompt a referral to Speech and Language Therapy.”

Source location

2021-0215-Response-from-Northern-Care-Alliance_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Share lessons from the inquest with Trust staff.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 June 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share lessons from the inquest with Trust staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I acknowledge that there are lessons emanating from this inquest, these have been shared with our staff. It is my experience that our employees are always receptive to learning, especially where it promotes good practice and enhances patient safety.”

Source location

2021-0215-Response-from-Northern-Care-Alliance_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 28 June 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026