PFD report

George Barry Broadhurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 May 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delayed review of radiology reports against clinical notes
  2. Delays in specialist reporting of X rays
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Insufficient radiology workforce capacity for timely imaging and interpretationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-up
  3. Insufficient training of community and primary care teams to recognise deterioration in healing fractures
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Continue international recruitment of radiologists to support diagnostic capacity, with demand planning underway for further recruitment.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Deliver the Long Term Workforce Plan, including expanded domestic education, training and recruitment and workforce retention measures.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Expand Clinical Radiology specialty training places to increase the trained reporting workforce.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 June 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    NHS Trusts are responsible for ensuring safe staffing levels in hospitals’ current day-to-day operations.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delayed review of radiology reports against clinical notes

Wider context from the report

“2. The knock-on impact of the delay in reporting is that once the radiology reports are available they then have to be reviewed in conjunction with the notes by a consultant days after the attendance to ensure the treatment given fits with the reported findings. This is a significantly more time-consuming process than them being looked at in real time and results in ED consultant resource being diverted away from the day to day demands of ED. Thus, placing a greater strain on clinicians in ED and stretching resources more thinly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in specialist reporting of X rays

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that the delay in reporting of X rays by radiologists is not unique to Tameside but is a national picture caused by a shortage of radiologists and trained reporting radiographers. The impact of the shortage is that ED doctors are interpreting x rays in highly pressured situations without specialist input and with a consequential risk of missing more subtle fractures. This means that patients are discharged with fractures rather than appropriate treatment or conversely are given unnecessary treatment that then has to be reversed once a specialist review takes place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Insufficient radiology workforce capacity for timely imaging and interpretation; Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient training of community and primary care teams to recognise deterioration in healing fractures

Wider context from the report

“3. The evidence given was that the level of pain that Mr Broadhurst still had in the community after 1st October was not in keeping with a healing fracture. The inquest was told that it was important that community/primary care teams were trained to understand how “normal” pain, in the context of a fracture being managed in the community, would present and what was a red flag/ deteriorating situation. Training on expectations around healing fractures would ensure what was a life-threatening deterioration was picked up and escalated at the earliest possible point. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue international recruitment of radiologists to support diagnostic capacity, with demand planning underway for further recruitment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A programme of international recruitment also ran in 2023/24 to enable Community Diagnostic Centres (CDCs) to deliver diagnostics and achieve the benefits in access, recovery and transformation of care. During 2023/24, 21 Radiologists were appointed through the programme. Further international recruitment is planned for 2024/25, with demand planning currently underway.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the Long Term Workforce Plan, including expanded domestic education, training and recruitment and workforce retention measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England is also working at a national level to deliver the Long-Term Workforce Plan. This is a robust and effective strategy to ensure we have the right number of”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand Clinical Radiology specialty training places to increase the trained reporting workforce.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following additional investment through spending review settlements in 2021/22 and 2022/23, the NHS has observed a significant and sustained expansion in recruitment to specialty training places. Clinical Radiology recruitment increased from an average of 234 trainees per year (between 2016 and 2020) to an average of 328 (between 2021 and 2022), meaning an expansion of around 100 specialty trainee places per year.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 1 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS Trusts are responsible for ensuring safe staffing levels in hospitals’ current day-to-day operations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“people, with the right skills and support in place, to be able to deliver the kind of care people need. It heralds the start of the biggest recruitment drive in health service history, but also of an ongoing programme of strategic workforce planning. It includes ambitious commitments to grow the workforce by significantly expanding domestic education, training and recruitment, as well as actions aimed at improving culture, leadership and wellbeing so that more staff are retained in NHS employment over the next 15 years. These actions will aim to close anticipated staffing shortfalls in the NHS in the long term, however NHS Trusts have a responsibility to ensure safe staffing levels in the current day to day operation of their hospitals.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Requesting doctors and clinical teams are responsible for reading, acting on, and safely managing imaging reports and alerts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On behalf of the Royal College of Radiologists, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) published ‘Alerts and notification of imaging reports’ in October 2022, which makes clear that the referrer is required to act on the report issued by imaging, and that it is the responsibility of the requesting doctor and/or their clinical team to read and act upon the report findings and fail-safe alerts as quickly and efficiently as possible. This extends to ensuring robust mechanisms are in place and that there are suitable resources to cover leave within clinical teams or practices.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local A&E procedures require follow-up of X-ray reports because general X-rays may not receive 24/7 imaging-service reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments are required to have local procedures in place to ensure that they follow up X-ray reports, based on the formal report being finalised, as pathologies can be missed via A&E routes and imaging services do not support/deliver 24/7 reporting of general X-rays.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss Regulation 28 reports through the national working group and share learning across NHS national and regional services.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 June 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Existing NICE guidance addresses primary-care assessment of back pain, including recognition of red-flag symptoms.

    Stated by NHS EnglandExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Regulation 28 reports through the national working group and share learning across NHS national and regional services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing NICE guidance addresses primary-care assessment of back pain, including recognition of red-flag symptoms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Report also raised concerns over community / primary care teams recognising red flag / deterioration symptoms and pain within the context of a fracture, and the importance of training for this. NHS England’s Primary Care colleagues have reviewed your Report and have advised that there is existing National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance for primary care healthcare professionals on the assessment and management of back pain. This includes guidance on asking about red flag symptoms and the list of red flag symptoms.”

Source location

Response from NHSE
Page 2 · response
Published 6 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026