PFD report

Chenyang Li · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Apr 2024•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of sufficient window restrictors in student accommodation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate window fall-prevention controls in residential accommodation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Fit window restrictors to every window at Scape Bloomsbury.

    Stated by Scape Operations LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.
  2. Action

    Inspect window restrictors every three months, immediately remedy defects, and log the work in the PPM system.

    Stated by Scape Operations LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.
  3. Action

    Visually inspect the building façade weekly for window defects, immediately remedy issues, and log the work.

    Stated by Scape Operations LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Scape UK Management is identified as the entity responsible for managing the building and the more appropriate recipient of the report.

    Stated by Scape Operations LtdRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sufficient window restrictors in student accommodation

Wider context from the report

“Students falling or jumping from windows is a known risk. Chenyang was able to easily jump to death from a 6th story window. Scope Bloomsbury is one of a number of is part of Scape Living Student Accommodation, a provider of purpose designed, student accommodation. The window Chenyang jumped from does not appear to have been fitted with any, or sufficient, form of window restrictors at all or as required under the National Code of Standards accreditation. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate window fall-prevention controls in residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fit window restrictors to every window at Scape Bloomsbury.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with the guidance set out by the National Code of Standards for Larger Developments for student accommodation not managed and controlled by educational establishments (the Code), each window at Scape Bloomsbury is fitted with a window restrictor; these were installed as part of the complete refurbishment of the building in 2018. The building will have received an inspection/sign-off from an inspector from The National Code at the time.”

Source location

Response from Scape Operations Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inspect window restrictors every three months, immediately remedy defects, and log the work in the PPM system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Over and above what is prescribed in the Code, the restrictors are periodically inspected every three months (as part of routine inspections of the condition of the student accommodation), with [on the rare occasion] any required remedial works undertaken immediately. This information is logged quarterly by the maintenance engineers within the building’s Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) system. In addition to three-monthly inspections of the window restrictors from within the bedroom, the building’s façade is also periodically visually inspected (weekly) to identify any remedial works required which would include windows appearing to be open beyond the tolerance allowable by the restrictor. Any issues are remediated immediately and logged by the maintenance team.”

Source location

Response from Scape Operations Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Visually inspect the building façade weekly for window defects, immediately remedy issues, and log the work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Over and above what is prescribed in the Code, the restrictors are periodically inspected every three months (as part of routine inspections of the condition of the student accommodation), with [on the rare occasion] any required remedial works undertaken immediately. This information is logged quarterly by the maintenance engineers within the building’s Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) system. In addition to three-monthly inspections of the window restrictors from within the bedroom, the building’s façade is also periodically visually inspected (weekly) to identify any remedial works required which would include windows appearing to be open beyond the tolerance allowable by the restrictor. Any issues are remediated immediately and logged by the maintenance team.”

Source location

Response from Scape Operations Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scape UK Management is identified as the entity responsible for managing the building and the more appropriate recipient of the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“One minor point of clarification. The report is addressed to Scape Operations Ltd. The more appropriate entity to address would have been Scape UK Management, as this is the entity responsible for managing the building. Scape UK Management have been made aware of the report, and they are in agreement with this response.”

Source location

Response from Scape Operations Ltd
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing window restrictors, periodic inspections, immediate remedial works and maintenance logging are considered sufficient, so no further action is proposed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In line with the guidance set out by the National Code of Standards for Larger Developments for student accommodation not managed and controlled by educational establishments (the Code), each window at Scape Bloomsbury is fitted with a window restrictor; these were installed as part of the complete refurbishment of the building in 2018. The building will have received an inspection/sign-off from an inspector from The National Code at the time.”

Source location

Response from Scape Operations Ltd
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026