Liliwen Iris THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Jul 2025•South Wales Central

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of explicit guidance on analgesia levels during induction and labour
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance
  2. Failure to appropriately control analgesia during induction and labour
  3. Lack of explicit guidance on supervision of women under analgesia
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Consider updating NG207 recommendations on the frequency of clinical assessments before active labour and during increasing pain relief.

  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Consider whether NG207 recommendations 1.5.6–1.5.8 require updating.

  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Consider updating NG235 pain-relief guidance on combination therapies and required further monitoring.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Policies and practices within Cardiff and Vale University Health Board are outside the areas NICE can comment on.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of explicit guidance on analgesia levels during induction and labour

Wider context from the report

“(1) Liliwen’s mother was given unlimited Entonox, as well as routine doses of pethidine and codeine. The result was that she effectively became comatose for a period of time, during which she delivered Liliwen; (2) Cardiff & Vale Health Board have taken significant steps to significantly restrict the use of analgesia during induction and labour, including reductions of prescribed doses, allowing only limited access to analgesia on the wards and increased levels of supervision of mothers under analgesia; (3) They have seen an escalation in the numbers of women being transferred from the induction ward to the delivery suite as a consequence of reduced analgesia, which would otherwise have masked the transition to active labour; and (4) The current NICE guidelines on Induction of Labour and Intrapartum Care do not deal explicitly with analgesia levels and supervision. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately control analgesia during induction and labour

Wider context from the report

“(1) Liliwen’s mother was given unlimited Entonox, as well as routine doses of pethidine and codeine. The result was that she effectively became comatose for a period of time, during which she delivered Liliwen; (2) Cardiff & Vale Health Board have taken significant steps to significantly restrict the use of analgesia during induction and labour, including reductions of prescribed doses, allowing only limited access to analgesia on the wards and increased levels of supervision of mothers under analgesia; (3) They have seen an escalation in the numbers of women being transferred from the induction ward to the delivery suite as a consequence of reduced analgesia, which would otherwise have masked the transition to active labour; and (4) The current NICE guidelines on Induction of Labour and Intrapartum Care do not deal explicitly with analgesia levels and supervision. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of explicit guidance on supervision of women under analgesia

Wider context from the report

“(1) Liliwen’s mother was given unlimited Entonox, as well as routine doses of pethidine and codeine. The result was that she effectively became comatose for a period of time, during which she delivered Liliwen; (2) Cardiff & Vale Health Board have taken significant steps to significantly restrict the use of analgesia during induction and labour, including reductions of prescribed doses, allowing only limited access to analgesia on the wards and increased levels of supervision of mothers under analgesia; (3) They have seen an escalation in the numbers of women being transferred from the induction ward to the delivery suite as a consequence of reduced analgesia, which would otherwise have masked the transition to active labour; and (4) The current NICE guidelines on Induction of Labour and Intrapartum Care do not deal explicitly with analgesia levels and supervision. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete NICE intrapartum care guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider updating NG207 recommendations on the frequency of clinical assessments before active labour and during increasing pain relief.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that we will consider updating the recommendations in our guidelines on inducing labour (NG207) and intrapartum care (NG235) as a result of the issues raised in your report. This will include the following specific considerations:”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider whether NG207 recommendations 1.5.6–1.5.8 require updating.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that we will consider updating the recommendations in our guidelines on inducing labour (NG207) and intrapartum care (NG235) as a result of the issues raised in your report. This will include the following specific considerations:”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider updating NG235 pain-relief guidance on combination therapies and required further monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that we will consider updating the recommendations in our guidelines on inducing labour (NG207) and intrapartum care (NG235) as a result of the issues raised in your report. This will include the following specific considerations:”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Policies and practices within Cardiff and Vale University Health Board are outside the areas NICE can comment on.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given that some of the matters of concern relate to policies and practices within Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, these are not areas that we can comment on, but I understand that you have also shared your report with the Health Board. Once we have concluded our review and decided on any updates needed to our guidance, we will write to you once more with the outcome. I hope that the information above is helpful and would like to reiterate my sincere condolences to Liliwen’s family.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026