PFD report

Isabella Hope HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Oct 2013•Liverpool

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of medical staff to follow UVC guidelines
  2. Failure to perform required x-ray confirmation of UVC position
  3. Inadequacy of UVC guidelines
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Clarify the radiology service agreement to require neonatal x-rays within 60 minutes of request, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 October 2013.
  2. Action

    Extend the UVC guideline to address potential consequences of using a catheter in a non-optimal position.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2013.
  3. Action

    Incorporate the case into all future medical staff induction programmes.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2013.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of medical staff to follow UVC guidelines

Wider context from the report

“As can be seen from the above Narrative, the facts of this case involved the use of Central Venous Catheterisation using an Umbilical Venous Catheter [UVC]. Whilst there can be complications of UVC insertion including mal-positioning and line migration, an x-ray is required to confirm clinically the position of a UVC [which can commonly be mal-positioned despite use of optimal operation technique]. The evidence heard confirmed the Trust's own guidelines were not followed in this case in that such an x-ray was not performed at a point during Isabella's treatment when it ought to have been, and the Trust's review confirms that this not being done amounted to sub-optimal standard. The Trust's document recommends a review of the UVC guidelines including a literature search of the UVC guidelines and discussions with senior colleagues at the other units in the practise, and of education and training around UVC guidelines. Having concluded this inquest, and whilst I acknowledge that the Trust have indicated that changes have already been instigated, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because issues surrounding the UVC guidelines – particularly in the absence of any national guidelines – gives rise to a concern of deaths in the future. I would therefore be obliged if the Trust would write to me in due course to confirm the outcome of their review once completed, setting out what is proposed in terms of changes to be made, and to explain what steps the Trust proposes to take to encourage medical staff to follow the guidelines. Perhaps the Trust would send me a copy of the full review document for my consideration once completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to perform required x-ray confirmation of UVC position

Wider context from the report

“As can be seen from the above Narrative, the facts of this case involved the use of Central Venous Catheterisation using an Umbilical Venous Catheter [UVC]. Whilst there can be complications of UVC insertion including mal-positioning and line migration, an x-ray is required to confirm clinically the position of a UVC [which can commonly be mal-positioned despite use of optimal operation technique]. The evidence heard confirmed the Trust's own guidelines were not followed in this case in that such an x-ray was not performed at a point during Isabella's treatment when it ought to have been, and the Trust's review confirms that this not being done amounted to sub-optimal standard. The Trust's document recommends a review of the UVC guidelines including a literature search of the UVC guidelines and discussions with senior colleagues at the other units in the practise, and of education and training around UVC guidelines. Having concluded this inquest, and whilst I acknowledge that the Trust have indicated that changes have already been instigated, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because issues surrounding the UVC guidelines – particularly in the absence of any national guidelines – gives rise to a concern of deaths in the future. I would therefore be obliged if the Trust would write to me in due course to confirm the outcome of their review once completed, setting out what is proposed in terms of changes to be made, and to explain what steps the Trust proposes to take to encourage medical staff to follow the guidelines. Perhaps the Trust would send me a copy of the full review document for my consideration once completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequacy of UVC guidelines

Wider context from the report

“As can be seen from the above Narrative, the facts of this case involved the use of Central Venous Catheterisation using an Umbilical Venous Catheter [UVC]. Whilst there can be complications of UVC insertion including mal-positioning and line migration, an x-ray is required to confirm clinically the position of a UVC [which can commonly be mal-positioned despite use of optimal operation technique]. The evidence heard confirmed the Trust's own guidelines were not followed in this case in that such an x-ray was not performed at a point during Isabella's treatment when it ought to have been, and the Trust's review confirms that this not being done amounted to sub-optimal standard. The Trust's document recommends a review of the UVC guidelines including a literature search of the UVC guidelines and discussions with senior colleagues at the other units in the practise, and of education and training around UVC guidelines. Having concluded this inquest, and whilst I acknowledge that the Trust have indicated that changes have already been instigated, I now write to the Trust to confirm that in my view the Trust should take action because issues surrounding the UVC guidelines – particularly in the absence of any national guidelines – gives rise to a concern of deaths in the future. I would therefore be obliged if the Trust would write to me in due course to confirm the outcome of their review once completed, setting out what is proposed in terms of changes to be made, and to explain what steps the Trust proposes to take to encourage medical staff to follow the guidelines. Perhaps the Trust would send me a copy of the full review document for my consideration once completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clarify the radiology service agreement to require neonatal x-rays within 60 minutes of request, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) The current Service Level Agreement (SLA) for Radiology with an external provider has been reviewed and clarified and now confirms that all required x-rays on neonatal patients will be performed within 60 minutes of receipt of a request, 24hrs per day and 7 days per week.”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend the UVC guideline to address potential consequences of using a catheter in a non-optimal position.

Verbatim wording from the response

“c) Further guideline work is planned to include the potential consequences of using a central venous catheter that is not in an optimal position.”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate the case into all future medical staff induction programmes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“iv. This case was included in the August medical staff induction programme and will be incorporated into all future medical staff inductions;”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver enhanced neonatal-unit education on the revised guideline.

Verbatim wording from the response

“What we have done to implement necessary changes:”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide individual feedback to staff involved in the event and inform trainees’ educational supervisors where necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“f) Individual feedback to all staff involved in the event has taken place and where necessary the educational”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a prospective audit of compliance with the revised UVC guideline.

Verbatim wording from the response

“e) A prospective audit around compliance against revised guideline is in progress;”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate UVC complication learning and case lessons through neonatal education, inductions, shift communications, risk huddles and network meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“d) Details of possible complications of misplaced UVCs and learning points from this case were disseminated to staff during August, September, October and November 2013 as follows:”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and relaunch the neonatal UVC guideline requiring urgent catheter-tip assessment after unexpected deterioration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) The neonatal guideline in respect of UVCs was revised immediately and now includes the following statement: ‘Any sudden or unexpected deterioration in a baby with a central venous catheter in-situ should always prompt an urgent assessment of the position of the catheter tip. Serious complications such as pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade or infusion of fluid into the pleural or peritoneal cavities should be excluded by x-ray or ultrasound’. The revised guideline was re-launched with the new cohort of junior medical trainees who commenced their placement in August 2013.”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Share the UVC case learning at the next British Association of Perinatal Medicine meeting.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2013.
  2. 2

    Progress the serious-incident action plan through designated leads and monitor completion through neonatal and Trust governance boards.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2013.
  3. 3

    Review UVC fixation and line-position documentation to identify a more secure method preventing catheter migration.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 October 2013.
  4. 4

    Deliver education sessions and Lessons of the Week to increase medical staff and nurse practitioner use of the Badger task list during handovers.

    Stated by Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 October 2013.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the UVC case learning at the next British Association of Perinatal Medicine meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“vi. Lessons learned were discussed at the Cheshire and Mersey Neonatal Network Meeting on 2nd December 2013 and will be shared at the next British Association of Perinatal Medicine meeting on 31st January 2014.”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress the serious-incident action plan through designated leads and monitor completion through neonatal and Trust governance boards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An Action Plan was generated following the Trust’s Serious Incident Review process and has been populated by recommendations and learning points from the Review. The Action Plan is being progressed by the neonatal Clinical Governance and Risk Leads and progress will be monitored by the Neonatal Executive Board, the Trust Board and by Liverpool Clinical Commissioning group until all actions have been completed. All actions have a designated lead and timeframes for completion.”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review UVC fixation and line-position documentation to identify a more secure method preventing catheter migration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“What we have done to implement necessary changes:”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver education sessions and Lessons of the Week to increase medical staff and nurse practitioner use of the Badger task list during handovers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“What we have done to implement necessary changes:”

Source location

2013-0281-Response-by-Liverpool-Womens-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 23 October 2013

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026